The FBI and Indigenous Movements with Nick Estes

The FBI and Indigenous Movements with Nick Estes

BonusReleased Wednesday, 4th September 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The FBI and Indigenous Movements with Nick Estes

The FBI and Indigenous Movements with Nick Estes

The FBI and Indigenous Movements with Nick Estes

The FBI and Indigenous Movements with Nick Estes

BonusWednesday, 4th September 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

2:00

of Hoover's dirty tricks. Nowhere

2:02

was this more evident than in

2:04

their interactions with the American Indian

2:07

Movement, or AIM, as well

2:09

as the greater Native American community. To

2:12

help us understand how Coentell Pro's

2:14

legacy unfortunately endured in this way,

2:17

we're honored to be speaking to Nick

2:19

Estes. Nick is an

2:21

assistant professor of American Indian Studies

2:23

at the University of Minnesota and

2:26

hosts the Red Nation podcast. To

2:34

start out, I would love for you to introduce

2:36

yourself, tell us a little bit about your background

2:38

and what it is you do. My

2:41

name is Nick Estes. I am

2:43

a member of the Lower Broll

2:45

Sioux Tribe. I was born and

2:47

raised in South Dakota. I'm currently

2:49

an American Indian Studies Assistant Professor

2:51

at the University of Minnesota. I'm

2:54

currently working on a book about the

2:56

history of the American Indian Movement. What

2:59

led you down this path? Two

3:01

of my grandfathers were writers.

3:04

One published the first history

3:06

of the Lower Broll Sioux Tribe in 1963, and

3:08

the other published another history in 1972. In

3:10

some ways, it's kind of a family tradition.

3:16

But also, I was an anti-war

3:19

protestor back when the United States

3:21

invaded Iraq for the second time,

3:23

and I kind of just stayed

3:25

in school after that. Went

3:28

on to get a PhD. Right

3:30

on. Well, as you know, this

3:32

season of snafu goes into considerable

3:34

depth about the status of J.

3:37

Edgar Hoover's FBI in the 1970s,

3:39

and many of the

3:41

ways that it was overtly

3:43

nefarious, oftentimes operating fully outside

3:46

of the law. This, of

3:48

course, exemplified by Co-Intel Pro

3:50

or the Counterintelligence Program, the

3:52

FBI surveillance program in the 60s

3:54

and 70s that targeted various political

3:57

groups such as the Black Panthers,

3:59

anti-Vietnam, and the Black Panthers. non-protesters,

4:01

civil rights demonstrators, etc. But

4:04

I'm really excited to talk with

4:06

you today about how the Native

4:08

American community experienced the FBI at

4:10

that time and really throughout the

4:12

20th century, which is quite

4:15

fascinating and complex. Let's

4:18

start at the beginning. The FBI's origin

4:20

story actually dovetails with a major incident

4:22

in 20th century Native American history, the

4:25

Osage murders throughout the 1910s, 20s, and

4:27

30s. Now

4:31

a lot of people will be familiar

4:33

with this story from the recent Martin

4:35

Scorsese movie, Killers of the Flower

4:37

Moon. So tell us

4:39

a little bit about the early interactions

4:41

between the Bureau and Native Americans

4:44

and also what

4:46

did the film get right and or

4:48

wrong? Many people have probably

4:51

seen this film. I started watching it, but

4:53

I couldn't watch it. I couldn't. It's

4:55

hard for me to watch the

4:58

killing, rape, and torture of Native women

5:00

over and over again on screen. It's

5:02

not something I find very entertaining. But

5:05

I do think that the movie itself

5:07

kind of gets to this, or at least is

5:09

trying to get to this history of

5:12

murder missing Indigenous women. I think what's

5:14

missing in that film, at least

5:17

from my perspective, is the

5:19

advocacy of people like Zinkala

5:21

Shah, who was born

5:23

as Gertrude Bonin. She was from

5:25

the Yankton Sioux Reservation. She

5:28

was an advocate, a Native woman who

5:30

worked in Congress, who was a lobbyist,

5:32

who was an activist, who

5:34

actually interviewed some of the

5:37

Osage women who had been

5:40

targeted by these men and really

5:42

brought attention to this issue. And that's not in

5:44

the film. It's also kind of propaganda

5:46

for the FBI because the FBI sees

5:49

itself as sort of this crime fighting

5:51

unit. It has a particular history with

5:54

Indigenous activists, but also the

5:56

FBI, according to its own

5:59

people. going

10:00

to change their lives. And so

10:02

they went into Minneapolis. At that

10:04

time, there was a lot

10:06

of Native people who were part of the

10:08

union movement, like the Teamsters. There was the

10:10

Teamsters Rebellion in Minneapolis in the 1930s. Native people

10:13

were part of that. Native people are part

10:15

of unions. They're part of working class history.

10:17

And so there was also

10:19

a lot of community organizations that were

10:21

centered around the family. And

10:23

so when these men arrived on

10:25

the scene, there already sort of existed

10:27

an infrastructure and a

10:29

complaint, so to speak, or an injury

10:32

that Native people felt in

10:34

Minneapolis because Minneapolis turned

10:37

what is known as the

10:39

East Phillips neighborhood into

10:41

a sort of slum. Things are

10:43

being shifted around. Termination is

10:45

happening at the same time where

10:48

the federal government is trying to

10:50

end its federal responsibilities with Native

10:52

people. They're enticing Native people to

10:54

leave their reservations on a relocation

10:56

program. They found themselves

10:58

in low-income slum housing. They found

11:01

themselves being targeted by these police

11:04

raids that were happening on the weekends

11:06

where a paddy wagon would literally just

11:08

pull up to an Indian bar on

11:10

Franklin Avenue and just start

11:12

loading people in once the bar closed. People

11:15

were getting beat. People were getting discriminated

11:17

against. Native children were

11:19

being taken from their families and

11:22

put into white foster care systems

11:24

or into white homes. One

11:26

study that came out in like the 1970s found that

11:28

between 25 to 35 percent of Native children had

11:33

been taken from or removed from

11:36

their families and placed into non-Native

11:38

homes. That's quite a bit, you

11:40

know. So it was

11:42

three things. It was child removal,

11:44

police violence, and urban poverty that

11:46

led to the foundations of

11:49

the American Indian movement. And it wasn't

11:51

just about confrontation politics, even though that's

11:53

kind of what one aimed the headlines

11:55

at the time when they began to

11:57

confront police and began filming them. and

12:01

following them around as they patrolled the

12:03

Indian bars on the weekends. But

12:05

they also began to form what were called survival schools,

12:08

which was literally just native

12:10

families pooling together what

12:13

small resources they had and

12:15

setting up a formal school system because

12:18

it was at public schools that native

12:20

children came under the surveillance

12:22

of state officials, whether it was through

12:24

the Department of Social Services. And

12:27

that was the place where they began

12:29

these child removal processes. So

12:32

it aim is known through the

12:34

media and its representation by the

12:36

FBI as a confrontational

12:38

sort of militant social movement.

12:42

But that sort of overshadows

12:44

the community work that it

12:46

was doing on the ground and what

12:48

won it a lot of respect by

12:50

community members themselves. I mean,

12:53

you spoke in some depth about some of

12:55

their initiatives. Is there an

12:57

overarching sort of mission of

12:59

the American Indian movement? And

13:01

does that also have some misconceptions

13:04

in the public discourse? So

13:06

in 1972, the American Indian movement, as

13:11

well as a coalition of various grassroots

13:13

native organizations, some of them even from

13:15

Canada, like the Canadian Indian Brotherhood participated

13:18

in it. They

13:20

drafted a 20-point policy framework

13:22

called the Trail of Broken

13:24

Treaties. And it sort

13:27

of lays out point by point what

13:29

was being advocated for. Number one priority

13:31

was abolishing the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

13:34

At that time period, the Bureau of Indian Affairs

13:36

was largely responsible for

13:39

plundering native lands and implementing

13:41

this termination system, assimilation, et cetera.

13:44

We saw the outcome of the 2011 Colbel

13:47

lawsuit that showed that the Bureau

13:49

of Indian Affairs had been mismanaging.

13:52

I think it was over $175

13:54

billion of what they could count

13:56

on paper of native assets. There

14:00

was also the program of

14:02

reestablishing a treaty relationship with

14:04

the United States government, sort

14:06

of ending every act, or

14:08

going back to 1871 when treaty making was

14:11

formally abolished with Native

14:13

nations. That sort of treaty commission, so

14:15

to speak, would replace the Bureau of

14:17

Indian Affairs. Native people would elect their

14:19

own leaders. Today we

14:21

have the Secretary of Interior, who

14:24

happens to be Native herself, Deb

14:26

Haaland, but that's not somebody we

14:28

elect, but nonetheless still to this

14:30

day has arbitrary authority over the

14:33

livelihoods and resources of Native people.

14:35

We're in the same department as

14:37

wildlife, right? Still

14:39

to this day. Those

14:41

were sort of the broader sort of

14:43

policy frameworks that they were pushing, but

14:46

also at a grassroots level, they

14:48

really wanted self-determination and

14:51

community control. Those

14:53

are sort of like the broad brushstrokes of

14:55

what they were trying to accomplish. For

15:01

decades, the mafia had New York

15:03

City in a stranglehold, with law

15:05

enforcement seemingly powerless to intervene. It

15:08

uses terror to extort

15:10

people. However, one murder

15:12

of a crime boss sparked a

15:15

chain of events that would ultimately

15:17

dismantle the mob. That

15:19

sent the message that we

15:21

can prosecute these people. Discover

15:24

how law enforcement and prosecutors took

15:26

on the mafia, and together brought

15:29

them down. These bosses

15:31

on the commission had no idea what

15:33

was coming their way from the federal

15:35

government. From Wolf Entertainment

15:37

and I Heart Radio, this is

15:39

Law and Order Criminal Justice System.

15:41

The first two episodes drop on

15:44

August 22. Plus,

15:46

did you know that you can listen to

15:48

the episodes as they come out completely ad

15:50

free? Don't miss out.

15:52

Subscribe to the I Heart True

15:55

Crime Plus channel today, available exclusively

15:57

on Apple podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features