Ep. 605: A Woman Among Wolves

Ep. 605: A Woman Among Wolves

Released Monday, 30th September 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 605: A Woman Among Wolves

Ep. 605: A Woman Among Wolves

Ep. 605: A Woman Among Wolves

Ep. 605: A Woman Among Wolves

Monday, 30th September 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

This is the me Eater podcast

0:11

coming at you shirtless, severely,

0:13

bug bitten, and in my case, underwear listening

0:15

to podcast you

0:18

Can't Predict Anything, brought to

0:20

you by first Light. This week, first Light is

0:22

celebrating its annual White Tail Week,

0:24

where you can tune in for tips, tricks and tactics,

0:27

as well as incredible deals

0:30

site wise. Check it out first light

0:32

dot com, f I R S

0:34

T L I t E dot com.

0:40

You hunt Big Game two?

0:41

I have?

0:42

Yeah, Yeah, I've got a I

0:44

haven't hunted big game in about

0:46

four years now, but I've shot a lot

0:48

of deer, antelope, elk, bighorn,

0:51

sheep, you bears, and I

0:54

just I train dogs and a bird hunt.

0:56

That's what I do now.

0:57

And so that's podcast.

1:03

Yeah, earlier

1:05

this about in the podcast,

1:08

I.

1:08

Might bring that pigeon down here in a couple of days. Let

1:10

him walk around up here.

1:12

At home, build a little roost for him in here.

1:15

Pretty tame, extremely tame. Nice

1:18

when you all it tries to do is get into the house.

1:20

You're kidding me, because it knows people are in the house.

1:23

Did you raise it?

1:24

My kids did?

1:25

It's not going to be a shooter then, right, No,

1:28

you got to.

1:28

Pass for

1:32

forty of his uh roostmates

1:35

went to bird dog trainers.

1:37

Yeah, but this was so what's his

1:39

name?

1:41

Peanut butter? Peanut but because

1:43

there was peanut butter and jelly but jelly, Uh,

1:45

John had to get euthanized. Yeah, I

1:48

had a health had a congenital birth effect

1:50

as far as we can tell.

1:51

Come on, you really did

1:53

euthanize it. You didn't train it?

1:55

Yeah, well it had as

1:58

it started passing its own intestine. Oh

2:01

my god, real buzz kills. Yeah,

2:05

yeah, Brody is over.

2:07

Is peanut Butter aware of the windows

2:09

outside and know where?

2:12

But it knows where the door is. It goes to the door.

2:15

Unbelievable.

2:17

Does it live outside?

2:18

Lives outside?

2:19

Oh?

2:19

Nice, it's at a bird sitters house? Right

2:21

now?

2:22

Did he fly over there?

2:27

You got the pigeon Gooso comes back home.

2:29

This is the start of the show.

2:30

We're already rolling. Give

2:33

me your book. There you go, Phil,

2:40

where's a good spot.

2:41

That's a great spot.

2:42

That looks good. Yeah, we're missing the bottom.

2:44

Quarter of the book of the cover, but we've got the time.

2:48

That's better. That's better. Joined

2:52

today by Diane Boyd, who came

2:55

on the you were on the

2:57

show.

2:57

A while ago, probably five years now.

2:59

Five years ago, way back in episode

3:01

one, six six days. Okay, that was a

3:03

great episode.

3:04

Thanks you made it great.

3:06

We did an episode called Hunting with Teeth with

3:08

Diane Boyd lay

3:10

out your can Can you lay out your your an

3:13

abbreviated form of your resume so people

3:15

know what you're all about?

3:16

Oh golly, yeah. I started working

3:18

with wolves in Minnesota in nineteen

3:20

seventy six. I was just

3:22

a child prodigy, Not really, I'm just old. And

3:25

anyway, I picked up Minnesota

3:27

wolves. I went worked in Wild the Wolves in Northern

3:29

Minnesota, and then I worked as a

3:31

for one summer before I came to Montana

3:33

as a depredation control trapper

3:37

and research collar northern Minnesota.

3:39

And then I moved to Montana in seventy nine

3:41

to pursue a couple of graduate degrees.

3:43

And I basically started

3:45

with the first wolf that walked down from

3:48

Canada and have maintained wolf

3:52

reintroduction, recolonization

3:55

information, all those yeares so kind

3:57

of from the first wolf to three thousand wolf.

4:00

Now that's what we got in the West.

4:01

Got it? And reason I like the

4:03

reason I like Diane Boyd and reach

4:06

he's back on the show. Is you

4:08

caught a lot of the hysteria and

4:13

a lot of the on each side.

4:17

If I don't know it, it's not right, especially

4:19

in today's climate of an election season.

4:21

I don't want to put it as the left and the right. How do

4:23

you put it the inn and the yang? Now? Okay,

4:28

if this can you see the book

4:30

and my hand film, if

4:32

this is attitudes of wolves,

4:35

and this is what this side

4:37

is that they're going to kill your children, okay?

4:41

And this side is that they

4:44

snuggle fawns.

4:45

They're going to save the planet, that

4:47

they're gonna.

4:48

Yeah, they're gonna save the planet, and and

4:50

and and reverse climate change. Diane

4:55

Boyd is, I don't want to have you be the middle finger.

4:57

That's a bad thing.

5:00

I'm gonna move this finger over where the middle finger

5:02

lives.

5:03

Great because it's like diet.

5:05

Yeah, she gives the middle finger to the sides.

5:09

I like that.

5:09

Never that way.

5:12

And she's got a new book coming out,

5:14

A Woman among Wolves, My Journey through forty

5:17

Years of Wolf Recovery. When is it available?

5:20

Right?

5:21

So it's coming out September tenth, it's

5:23

being released and you can pre ordered

5:25

on Amazon and

5:27

Barnes and Nobles. It's up there now, got

5:30

it.

5:31

My mom's husband, my mom got married. After my dad

5:33

died, my mom got remarried. Now that guy passed

5:35

away. You know he called Barnes and Noble. He

5:38

called it books and Nobles.

5:40

Wow, makes

5:43

sense.

5:43

Yeah, it was MacDonald's and it was

5:45

Books and Nobles.

5:49

Uh, case you forget later.

5:51

I think you should ask Diane. She's gonna read

5:54

her own audiobook.

5:56

Oh listen, I'm

5:59

gonna tell you the

6:02

audiobook. Don't don't have them to do a person.

6:05

Don't bring in a soap opera person. Who's

6:07

going to do the audiobook.

6:08

It's got to be you. Do you want to start a little

6:11

bit? So my Graystone

6:13

Publishing sold the audio rights to a media

6:15

company.

6:16

Ye, and that's how that's

6:18

normal.

6:18

They hired a professional actress

6:20

to read.

6:21

Did you really come in there and complain?

6:23

Well?

6:23

I didn't know that, And then when I found out,

6:26

I just said, well, you know, I know the story

6:28

pretty well, and I do a lot of public speaking,

6:30

and I think I've got an engaging voice,

6:32

even with my Fargo accent. So

6:35

they had me send an audio edition and

6:37

they wrote me back and he said, well,

6:40

if you want to do the reading, we're going to have to basically

6:43

train you and it's going to take a lot

6:45

of time and blah blah blah blah.

6:47

So you know why they're telling me that they

6:49

got these holsers that do it all the time.

6:52

Okay, and they come in they know they're going to get it done

6:54

in two days whatever. Don't

6:57

let that happen. I let that happen

6:59

before, and I've mentioned

7:01

bunch of times. I let that happen before. I

7:04

got the thing in. I

7:06

turned it on and I could not cross

7:08

the room quick enough to turn it off the

7:11

minute that person opened their mouth, Because

7:14

like, you live your work, yeah

7:17

right, and when you're writing it, you're it's

7:19

you. You're it's you know what I mean. You're doing

7:21

it, you're saying it, you're reading it to yourself, you're

7:23

making it perfect, and then some other person picks

7:25

it up and touches it. It's like watching It's

7:29

like, are you married? No, If

7:32

you were, it

7:35

would be like watching someone

7:37

handle your husband.

7:39

That was an impossibility. I was married briefly,

7:43

Okay, I get it.

7:44

You get it.

7:45

Picture that you were still married. You

7:47

really liked him, and you had to watch

7:50

someone else, right.

7:53

No go. But anyway,

7:55

I the other thing was they're doing

7:57

this. They wanted to be done when the book

7:59

is released in September tenth, and I'm

8:02

going bird hunting. I mean, I got stuff to

8:04

do, and I actually just don't. At

8:07

this point, I just threw my hands upisode whatever.

8:09

Yeah, I'm okay,

8:13

thank you though.

8:15

Next time, next time.

8:17

I appreciate the advice.

8:18

Yeah, I knew.

8:20

Whitetail Week coming up here at me

8:22

Eiter one week only nine to thirty to ten six.

8:26

White Tail Week's the best time stock

8:28

up on whitetail gear with deals from first

8:30

like FHF Gear, Phelps, game calls, Dave Smith,

8:33

Decoy's at the me Eater store,

8:37

plus a full

8:39

week of white tail content we've done he's

8:41

in the past. It's like, you know, there's

8:44

a TV channel that

8:46

has a they celebrate a fish all week

8:48

every year. It's

8:51

like that, but it's for people that like white tails. Oh

8:54

you know, it's funny. I'm

8:57

working on this new project and

9:00

we got to do a bunch of scuba diving over the last week,

9:02

and we had these underwater It's

9:05

like an you can talk underwater. It's

9:08

a special mask like you don't, you know, normally use

9:10

a you have like a breathing apparatus and a regular

9:12

mask. But it's this big contained things you can hold a button

9:14

like talk underwater to people, it's

9:16

hard to be heard

9:20

and h it's just

9:22

it's not a perfect system, as you can imagine talking

9:24

underwater and

9:28

someone so we rented

9:31

this equipment from this place that rents this stuff

9:33

out, and like, well, how in the world on Shark

9:35

Week are they all talking to each other underwater? He

9:38

goes, Oh, they dubed that all the uh

9:45

mid uh

9:48

this is you folks will appreciate

9:50

this. Sometime between mid and end

9:52

of September, The

9:56

Fucked Up Bullshitters Calendar is out. It's the third

9:58

in our ft up series. We the Deer

10:00

Stands Taxidermy

10:03

and now it shitters. Some of the

10:05

world's best

10:08

and worst worst not

10:10

best, yeah, the best

10:12

of the worst old shitters laying

10:14

around out in the woods from

10:17

the Arctic to the Midwest

10:21

and probably points south.

10:22

Did you do captions this time?

10:23

Oh?

10:24

Yeah, great captions.

10:25

Oh yeah, I don't know that I'd say that they're

10:27

all the worst because some of them are

10:29

just intriguing intriguing,

10:31

like you you'd want to give them a run.

10:34

Yeah, carved out a giant tree stumps. So

10:37

like one, Yeah, one is sort of I don't know

10:39

what. It looks like, a giant redwood or a sequoia or

10:41

something. I don't know what it is, probably not. No, it's a cedar,

10:44

a huge Western red seedar, that's what it is.

10:47

And they carved a shitter out of a Western

10:49

red seater. It's beautiful. So in the caption

10:51

process, we sit around thinking of what would

10:53

be funny, and we're like, something

10:55

to do with e walks would be funny, and

10:58

then you work that into a caption. There's

11:00

one that is very Southwest

11:04

and when I looked at it, I thought of the Alamo. And

11:06

so then you work up a caption that's like a joke about

11:10

the Alamo. That's

11:13

all that process.

11:14

Are there any uh outhouses

11:17

or ships that you wouldn't want to Oh?

11:19

Yeah, there are.

11:24

I'd say the one I wouldn't want to do the want need

11:26

of an upholstery job.

11:28

I wouldn't touch that thing until someone's

11:31

mm hmm.

11:32

There was definitely something that made

11:34

me lose my faith in humanity, like gross

11:37

like stuff.

11:38

That didn't make the cut. There's nothing gross

11:40

about the count.

11:40

No, no, no,

11:44

we had some gross submissions, a

11:46

lot.

11:47

Of gross submissions. There was none of our submissions

11:49

has none

11:51

of the submissions are like poor etiquette.

11:54

None of the submissions. There's no there's

11:57

no fecal matter. There were a.

11:59

Couple that you guys didn't see that.

12:00

We're being used the

12:03

people send in.

12:04

Oh you cut those out. We have no people

12:06

in it.

12:07

I didn't.

12:07

I didn't think they'd make the cut, so I didn't

12:09

send those alone.

12:10

It's twelve months, that's

12:12

how many months, or in a year, it's

12:15

twelve months of beautiful

12:19

photography of if you were wandering around out

12:21

in the woods, or wandering around up in the Arctic,

12:24

or wandering around wherever, and

12:26

you came into a and you came across

12:28

an old shitter, and you're like, gow

12:31

the stories that old shitter could

12:34

tell, that's what this calendar is all

12:36

about.

12:37

And they're all shitters you'd tell someone about. Oh,

12:40

you're like, you wouldn't believe what I found.

12:41

Oh yeah, If you were hunting with your buddy or whatever,

12:44

and you went off to go check on something and

12:46

you encountered one of these shitters

12:49

and you came back. I don't care. If you saw

12:55

two booner bucks fighting and stuck

12:57

together, you'd

12:59

run back to your body and you'd be like, you

13:01

would not believe the shitter. I just saw it.

13:03

Oh.

13:03

Plus, there's two booner bucks stuck together

13:05

over there. That's

13:08

how that that's the quality of these shitters.

13:10

Like recently, I was was last

13:12

hunting season, I was up on the Rocky Mountain

13:14

front, and that Augusta showedo zone.

13:17

You've probably Randall. Seems like you've

13:20

been to every bar in every small town in Montana's

13:22

you've probably been to this one. But in

13:24

their bathrooms they have pictures

13:27

of uh some outhouses. And one

13:29

of the favorite ones I've seen, it's like it's you can

13:31

see the front, but the outhouses

13:33

out in the flats and it's

13:36

got these it looks like two telephone

13:38

poles that are wedged like between it's

13:40

like upper corners at the eve and the

13:42

ground, just basically

13:45

meaning that the wind blows so hard

13:47

there that if this outhouse isn't

13:49

supported with telephone poles, like you

13:51

know at an angle.

13:52

It's gonna lift it off.

13:54

Yeah, or at least that

13:57

was brutalized by the wind. Pretty good.

13:59

Yeah, just there's just you're

14:02

looking down a hill and you can just see the

14:04

the shitter blown

14:06

off away. We also had a lot

14:08

of tandems, and we only put one tandem

14:11

in because I don't I don't really

14:13

understand, like my

14:15

when my little kids were littler,

14:18

I could see them utilizing

14:20

a tandem, but.

14:21

You wouldn't park next to you on in

14:23

the morning.

14:24

They're not going to utilize the tandem, right.

14:27

I know of a use for a tandem out house

14:29

at the pace. So my first year up there

14:31

in seventy nine, got Giardia

14:33

and there was a two seater outhouse and

14:36

there was a moment one day when

14:38

I needed to use both holes

14:40

at the same time, just

14:45

saying.

14:47

Yeah, do

14:49

you know what the next installment of ft

14:52

UP.

14:52

I want to do. It's a it's a photographic

14:55

challenge. I want to do fish cleaning stations

14:58

or just fucked up old fisher man. But

15:04

I'd like to do fish cleaning stations, just the nastiest,

15:07

grossest fish clean stations. But it's

15:09

hard to capture the smell. Never

15:12

scratch and sniff. When you were a kid, if

15:14

you could scratch and sniff old

15:16

fish cleaning stations.

15:20

Hit too nice. Now

15:22

after the fix up joke.

15:24

It wouldn't even be good anymore. I know we got

15:26

ruined for that. Yeah, I'm not sure,

15:28

but this one is. This one is great if you

15:30

know someone else appreciates an old

15:32

out house. Oh one of these old out

15:34

houses that got caught on fire and

15:37

put out. And I was trying

15:39

to think of a taco bell joke fire

15:44

too many flaming hot cheetos. But

15:48

I think on that one, the joke landed around

15:50

like it was from Southeast Alaska, and

15:53

I think the joke was something about how hard it is

15:55

to get anything to burn in southeast Alaska,

15:58

but nothing wants to burn there, so

16:00

how would you get, you know, some kind of joke like that.

16:03

A couple thoughts from Helfelfinger on

16:05

a past episode. It's

16:08

a rebuttal, it's a retraction. It's

16:10

actually not. It's a fortification. But

16:15

half a Finger had a good quote. It's not his quote.

16:17

He wrote it down. A retraction

16:21

never gets the traction of

16:23

the reaction to

16:25

the original action.

16:28

Once again, a retraction never gets the

16:32

from the top. A

16:34

retraction never gets

16:37

the traction of

16:39

the reaction to the

16:42

original action. A

16:45

great illustration of that would be

16:47

when it came out two

16:50

I can think of years ago, it

16:52

came out that like a guy supposedly

16:54

got died from

16:57

eating squirrel brains, and

17:01

then it was all that was everywhere.

17:04

Every news agency picked this article up,

17:08

and then it came out, well, actually,

17:11

no, he just died of a brain disease.

17:14

And in his past he had eaten a squirrel

17:16

brain. So

17:18

of the one hundred or two hundred people that die

17:20

of this every year, he happened

17:23

in his history had eaten a squirrel brain. And

17:25

it just didn't quite

17:27

get the traction of the reaction to the original

17:29

action. I

17:32

was commenting. I used to always tell people.

17:34

I used to somehow, somehow, it was told

17:37

to me that automobile insurance

17:39

companies often

17:41

pushed to reduce deer numbers so

17:43

that to reduce their premium

17:46

load from all the

17:48

claims made from crashing and cars

17:51

hitting things. So agricultural

17:54

interests, and I would say, automobile interests,

17:56

automobile insurance interests would like to

18:00

suppressed dear numbers. Now

18:03

helfle Finger, I don't know where he hangs

18:05

out. He's saying automobile

18:08

insurance companies plural

18:13

have told Helfflefinger personally

18:15

they have no interest in spending any money to reduce

18:18

audio collisions because

18:20

they just run the numbers and charge whatever premium

18:23

they need to cover collisions with deer, while

18:26

they want to spend time or money on something

18:28

that might reduce deer collisions like overpasses,

18:31

when they can just simply take it into consideration

18:33

when they do all their math, they

18:39

pass it along to the consumer also,

18:45

so Hefflefinger commented on that. Hefflefinger

18:48

commented on this. We

18:52

were discussing a plan taking

18:54

route in Oklahoma and elsewhere

18:56

of taking this is a little bit

18:58

complicated. Some white tailed

19:00

deer farmers, white tail deer ranchers that

19:03

hell you call them, that believe

19:05

they have some deer that are resistant to CWD,

19:09

meaning they'll have a population deer and some de just

19:11

don't get it. And

19:13

they're saying, hey, we should take these deer that don't get

19:15

it and seed wild populations

19:18

with our resistant deer in the hopes

19:20

of sort of speeding along or

19:22

making you

19:24

know, these deer have a g mutation that makes

19:26

them not so susceptible. Let's

19:29

put them out in the wild, and hopefully they'll breed

19:31

with wild deer and eventually we will create this CWD

19:34

resistant wild deer herds, which

19:36

just strikes me as like incredibly dubious

19:40

health. A finger says, deer with that genetic

19:42

combo are not resistant to

19:44

c w D. They just don't die as fast,

19:48

and it's not a good thing to have CWD

19:51

positive deer running around for a longer period

19:53

of time in the environment shutting infectious

19:56

prions. I can't remember if I decided on preons

19:58

or prions.

19:59

What do you say, primes?

20:01

Okay, so I'm gonna stick with the

20:04

Pandora's box is that when you intensively

20:06

select for those CWD

20:09

related genes in captivity, you are

20:11

also selecting for other genes that are

20:13

close to them on the same chromosome.

20:17

Genes that are physically close to one another

20:19

on the same chromosome are inherited

20:21

together at a higher rate. We

20:24

have no idea what those other

20:26

nearby genes are. They

20:29

might be genes that lower reproductive rate,

20:32

produce smaller antlers, a

20:34

higher susceptibility to other diseases.

20:37

Tameness, who knows.

20:41

It's just a bad idea to circumvent

20:43

natural selection for a lot of reasons, and this

20:45

would never move the needle on CWD

20:47

spread or prevalence in the wild.

20:50

These genes associated with deer surviving

20:53

longer with CWD are in fact increasing

20:55

in frequency in the wild populations

20:58

through natural selection, but very

21:00

slowly. Steve's point

21:03

is right. Ha, that's

21:05

my favorite part of the letter. I

21:08

don't even know what I said. This

21:11

makes me feel like when I

21:14

once every five years and I go bowling, and I always

21:16

get like at least one strike. Steve's

21:19

point is right that releasing a few more

21:21

of those animals from captivity is not going to

21:23

change gene frequencies in a free ranging

21:26

wild population and has the potential

21:28

to do harm. He goes on to

21:30

say, if you like Sonoran hot dogs, Guero,

21:36

which I do, well, I think that's what he's talking

21:38

about. Who's

21:40

gonna take a stab at this?

21:41

Guero Canelo?

21:43

Guero Canelo very

21:47

good, top ten and two

21:50

sound number one in his opinion, But prices

21:52

have gone up in a way that the exceeds the quality

21:54

of the food.

21:55

He says, no, no, no, no, Guero

21:57

Canelo is where I always take you. He's

21:59

giving you a

22:02

another option.

22:05

Yeah, we plugged Guero Canelo in

22:07

a Trivia episode.

22:08

Oh, and he's saying, las cerrita del roro,

22:11

h is a better Mexican

22:14

hot dog.

22:17

I think it's La care delro

22:20

but you're close. Is that as good? That's

22:22

in Tucson as well, Yes, where

22:25

the Snoran dogs are famous, and

22:27

it looks way different. And I think

22:29

he can didn't he read what goes

22:31

on there and what is?

22:36

Or he wrote sorry, but yep,

22:39

Jim, if you Jim's got his eyes on a

22:41

good Mexican hot dog. Another

22:48

rebuttal. This is a rebuttal from

22:50

Bubbly Doug.

22:51

We're gonna eat him in January.

22:52

Half a finger. Bubbly Doug are sort of the main

22:55

rebuttal generators and clarification generators,

23:00

but.

23:00

This is from Doug's splash like a friend.

23:02

Doug's friend you.

23:04

Doug's friend is very annoyed about something I said about

23:06

c w D. And I've said this, and I've said it

23:09

before. I don't love if I'll say it again. But there's

23:11

a there's a point I often make, and

23:13

and all it always irritates

23:16

some people, but I just I say

23:18

it because it's just it's a true feeling that I

23:20

have in discussing chronic

23:22

waste and disease in deer, I

23:25

often say the thing most

23:27

scary. This is not what I say, but I'm trying

23:29

to say it in cleaner terms.

23:33

What's horrifying to me is that some

23:37

hunter out there. It

23:41

horrifies me that some hunter out there would contract CWD

23:44

from a deer and it would jump the species

23:46

barrier. And so because it because

23:49

it's so alarming to me, it's so scary to me, I'll

23:52

often say that that I'll put some

23:55

statistic around it where I'll try to say, you

23:57

know, I might say something to the effect of ninety

24:00

percent of my concern about chronic waste

24:02

and diseases, it's going to pass to some that

24:05

some hunter is gonna get it. And if it were to jump the

24:07

species barrier, just it would just change deer

24:10

hunting. It would change deer management,

24:13

it would change deer hunting, it would change the perception

24:15

of deer, like we put a huge cultural

24:17

value on deer if they were this

24:19

thing that was causing you

24:23

know, like like these sort of like horrible

24:25

prolonged deaths from like prion

24:28

diseases and humans. I mean, it's it's just disgusting

24:30

to even think about. So when I track see

24:33

when I when I follow news about CWD

24:35

and try to advocate on behalf of research

24:37

around CWD and trying to stop the spread of

24:39

CWD. A huge part of my

24:41

motivation is that, like, it just makes

24:43

me sick to think about anyone,

24:48

my kids, whatever, somehow doing this

24:50

and the implication how it would affect my diet. That's

24:52

kind of like the main thing I'd like to eat. Dear

24:54

me, Uh,

24:56

this does not go over well with some people,

24:59

and don't Ug's friend who's

25:01

a landowner farmer in the state

25:03

of Washington. She

25:06

says, if Steve's biggest concern with CWD

25:08

is the potential risk to humans, it

25:11

feels contradictory to the values

25:13

he often expresses as a conservationist.

25:19

You could be a humanist and a conservation at

25:21

the same time. But back to

25:23

the letter, it gives the impression

25:25

that he values animal welfare less

25:27

than he claims, which

25:29

stands in contrast to his usual corn

25:32

arguments against vegans that he likely

25:34

cares more for animals and understands

25:36

them better than they do. It's

25:38

frustrating to hear him repeatedly say

25:40

that his greatest worry is the disease

25:43

jumping to humans when animal

25:45

welfare is at stake right now, it's

25:48

not just Doug who's upset about this, me too.

25:52

And she goes on as well to

25:55

counter my observation that if

25:58

another thing I've said about CWD, then we'renna leave.

26:00

I'm gonna leave the subject behind for a minute. Another thing I

26:02

will frequently say about CWD is

26:05

how can it be? Or why is it that

26:07

I'm so afraid of it jumping the species

26:10

barrier to humans. I

26:12

would feel that livestock

26:15

producers would

26:18

be more afraid than I am,

26:20

because, as I said, a

26:24

cow in

26:26

a sheep look

26:28

a hell of a lot more like a deer than I do.

26:31

All you gotta look at is like what happened with mad

26:33

cow disease written right, they can

26:35

imagine that across the entire United

26:37

States.

26:38

Correct what it would do to the cattle

26:40

ustry. And this person is

26:43

countering. She's

26:45

saying, I don't think they're not

26:47

worried about this. I

26:53

can't really do a tit for tat on that issue. I understand

26:55

what you're saying about animal welfare. I'm just

26:57

telling you a thing that like, like, for instance,

27:00

when my kids out playing in the road, okay,

27:05

and I get nervous that they're chasing

27:07

there, that they're that they go to chase their baseball

27:10

across the highway without

27:12

looking. And I'm like, man, the

27:14

main thing that worries me about my kid

27:17

chasing the ball across the highway

27:19

is that my kid will get hit by a car. Someone

27:21

would say like, well, that doesn't go with

27:24

your view as a conservationist, because why

27:26

are you not so worried about the deer that get hit

27:28

on the road. Aren't you worried about animal

27:30

welfare? I'm like, yes, not as worried any

27:32

about my kid get hit on the road.

27:34

Yeah.

27:34

I mean I read

27:36

this as like the only thing you're concerned

27:39

about is humans. But what I said, I

27:41

know, but that's what it kind

27:43

of sounds like she's saying here, like you can be

27:45

concerned about humans and worry about the

27:47

deer herds too.

27:48

Yeah. When I see a deer run across the room, I was like the

27:52

driver I freaked out on. I was in the

27:54

pastor's seat and I freaked out on. The guy'd be like, slow down,

27:57

dude, how do you know there's not more.

27:58

I think that she's just I think it's a she.

28:01

I don't know why it is because.

28:05

And the fact that he says she.

28:06

But I think she's pointing out that maybe

28:09

there's a constant O middle when

28:12

you talk about CWD, about that

28:14

part, I always qualify that part.

28:16

I also think it's hard to I

28:18

mean, the CWD

28:21

is going to be a lot worse for deer if

28:23

people get it from deer, Like, if

28:25

you're concerned about deer as a whole, if

28:28

it jumps the species barrier, CWD

28:30

is going to be a much worse outcome

28:32

for our white tail populations

28:35

as a whole.

28:35

And if it jumps the species, yeah,

28:37

if it jumps the species barrier into cattle,

28:40

and all of a sudden, we have to have the same conversations

28:43

about deer and CWD as

28:45

we do about free ranging buffalo

28:48

and cattle because of brucellosis. And

28:50

people are like, hey, man, if the

28:52

state owns the deer, keep those deer away

28:54

from my place.

28:56

Yeah, it's a it's

28:58

a much darker picture for not

29:00

only people, but the health of deer

29:02

as a whole if that were to happen.

29:04

And I don't omit. The other thing I don't

29:06

omit the other thing the same way. When I'm driving,

29:09

or I'm right in the car and I see a deer

29:11

cross and I see that the driver that I'm

29:13

with isn't thinking about how there's probably

29:15

some following it, and I'm like, dude, so now come

29:17

on. But

29:21

if I saw a kid run across the road, my reaction

29:24

is going to be even stronger. I'm

29:26

gonna get out and yelled the kid.

29:27

Yeah.

29:27

I think it's perfectly normal to be more worried about

29:29

your kids than deer.

29:33

Then you are worried about like the welfare

29:35

of a deer, or deer is

29:37

a population.

29:38

I do worry.

29:39

Yeah, let me ask you this.

29:40

I think it's pretty valid.

29:41

If I could guarantee you that it

29:44

would not jump the species barrier, but you

29:46

could get rid of it by snapping your fingers, would

29:48

you still get rid of CWD?

29:51

Oh? Yeah, I mean that's the course.

29:52

And let's say it's like you can you can be worried about

29:55

one thing more than the other, but still have

29:57

concern for cw

30:00

D as a problem for deer.

30:02

If we could spend money and get rid of EHD

30:05

in blue tongue, I'd be like, oh, let's go spend

30:07

the money and get rid of HD. In blue tongue, Yeah,

30:09

it's like it upsets any It upsets equilibrium

30:12

and causes a lot of trouble for deer hunters when their

30:14

area gets wiped out. It's like rags the

30:16

riches on deer populations, where you get a lot of deer and

30:18

all of a sudden you're like, well, we got a lot now, but now

30:21

that we got this many, just wait for EHD to come through

30:23

and then they'll be laying dead on the side of some pond. I

30:27

would still think we should spend much money, and like, here's

30:29

the thing too, from their perspective,

30:32

that's the reason I'm always advocating on research,

30:36

Like, knowing that there's that risk out there, study

30:38

the hell out of it. I think they should be.

30:41

I think there should be a lot of money getting pumped into studying

30:43

it. It's not like that perspective is not adversarial

30:46

to want to control what's

30:49

going on. Who

30:51

else to talk about?

30:52

Wolves?

30:53

Me?

30:58

Where do we start? Let

31:01

me ask you this question. Can I remind

31:04

you of something you told me the last time?

31:05

Oh?

31:05

Yeah, sure, the

31:08

last time you were on the show. And I

31:10

want to pick this up and have you extend that logic.

31:13

I want to see if you still feel that way, and if you

31:15

would extend it to Colorado and just

31:17

just run with this. You

31:20

said something that surprised me when you were on the show before.

31:23

You had said, had

31:28

we never did we

31:30

humans America's Americans? Whatever?

31:33

Had we never conducted had we decided

31:35

to not do a reintroduction

31:38

of wolves in Yellowstone

31:41

National Park in the frank Church Wilderness area,

31:43

meaning have we not gone and live

31:46

captured wolves elsewhere and

31:48

brought them to turn them loose? We

31:52

probably would have. I can't remember the exact way

31:54

you put it. We probably would have eventually

31:58

landed in the same spot we're at right

32:00

now. From natural migration.

32:03

Yes, I still feel that way. And

32:06

the only so wolves are expanding

32:09

globally in Canada. They're

32:11

all over the Midwest here in

32:13

our west Europe, and the

32:15

only place where wolves have been reintroduced

32:18

was Yellowstone and the frank

32:20

Church Mexican

32:22

wolves, red wolves. But wolves have globally

32:25

expanded without any reintroduction.

32:27

There's wolves in the Netherlands. Now, there's wolves

32:29

in Denmark. Nobody put them there.

32:31

Wolves have been getting there on their own

32:34

and the wolves did get to Colorado. They've

32:36

had the first reproduction I think it was twenty

32:38

twenty or twenty twenty one from Wyoming wolves,

32:41

and those wolves ended up boot them being killed,

32:43

but they were getting there on their own. And

32:46

I feel very strongly that where

32:48

Colorado is at since twenty

32:51

twenty is about where we were at in Montana

32:54

in nineteen seventy nine eighty when a

32:56

few wolves started walking

32:58

down on their own power from Canada and

33:01

slowly got a toe hold, so to speak,

33:04

and repopulated on their own.

33:08

Can you mentioned the Great Lakes? Can you move over?

33:10

Can we move over real quick to the Great Lakes? And you can touch

33:12

on that real quick? Talk

33:16

about that for a men like no reintroduction?

33:18

Right, if

33:20

we look at in the

33:23

northern Great Lakes, we have Minnesota,

33:27

Wisconsin, Michigan, anyone

33:29

else have a stable

33:31

viable population.

33:32

No Ile Royal. There was a recent

33:34

reintroduction to Ile Royal because

33:37

the wolves are dying out other than that

33:39

Michigan waters.

33:40

Yes, can you give

33:43

a little crash course on how were

33:46

they ever gone gone?

33:47

No?

33:48

Good question.

33:49

So when I left Minnesota in nineteen seventy

33:51

nine working with wolves, there was just

33:53

under a thousand wolves, nine hundred to one thousand wolves

33:55

in Minnesota. There was a handful

33:58

in Wisconsin, probably less than a dozen.

34:01

There was maybe twenty five in Isle Royal

34:03

that had gotten their late forties early fifties

34:05

by crossing the frozen Lake Superior ice

34:08

and that was it. And now there's

34:11

I'm trying to think of the numbers of wolves in the Midwest.

34:13

It's over a thousand, might be a couple thousand,

34:15

three thousand. I'm trying to think, have.

34:17

They been extirpated from Michigan.

34:20

Yes, they're extirpated from Michigan and Wisconsin.

34:23

They were never extirpated from Minnesota

34:25

because the northern fourth or third of the state

34:27

is too remote roadless, so there

34:30

always was a stronghold. And I'm trying to think.

34:32

You're not calling me a liar when I say that I saw

34:34

a wolf track in the eastern up

34:36

in nineteen ninety four.

34:37

Are no, no what I saw?

34:39

I fight you?

34:40

No.

34:40

Absolutely, I'm saying viable populations

34:43

breading reproducing established packs.

34:45

No.

34:45

Because my friend Dick Theo was documenting wolves

34:47

recovering to Wisconsin starting and I think I

34:50

think he saw his first wolf track in like seventy

34:52

two or seventy three, they were trying

34:54

and Michigan same thing. And actually

34:57

there was a reintroduction into Michigan

35:00

in the up. It's nineteen

35:03

seventy, seventy four to seventy

35:05

eight, somewhere in there. Seventy four you can read

35:07

about. It's in my book. And they took

35:10

four wolves from Minnesota and

35:12

they transplanted them, reintroduced

35:14

them to northern Michigan. It was during just

35:17

before deer seasons, were they really and they eventually

35:19

all four were killed pretty quickly, So

35:21

that.

35:22

What people guns, animal

35:24

rights people.

35:26

Failing sorry for him in the Michigan winters.

35:30

So that was actually the very first

35:32

wolf for introduction that I'm aware of, and people

35:34

don't.

35:35

Often who did that reinduction.

35:37

It was like the state was it

35:39

real hot politically at the time.

35:41

You you didn't know about it. I'd say, no, it wasn't

35:43

right.

35:43

It's no internet, right, no.

35:45

Internet, no Facebook and on social

35:48

media. So it was done. They

35:50

were held a little while in a pen

35:53

and then they were let go, and that was the model

35:55

for how they were going to reintroduce to wolf seat

35:57

to Yellowstone. So Yellowstone wasn't Yellowstone,

35:59

Ido. Wasn't the first reintroduction

36:02

Michigan.

36:03

Was they took them from Minnesota and put them in Michigan. Yes,

36:05

I'm from Michigan. I didn't know that.

36:07

Google it.

36:08

Try it Michigan wolf for introduction

36:10

if you're so,

36:13

and look in the seventies, I think seventy

36:15

four. So yeah, but none of them

36:17

made it. And it wasn't that they didn't know

36:19

how to hunter, didn't know how to find their

36:21

way around because they're wild wolves, just

36:23

that too many people with guns. So

36:26

anyway, that was you asked. That was the first. And

36:29

then of course our wolves were coming down into

36:32

Montana from the North Country

36:34

from Canada on their own.

36:35

What year were they so

36:40

in the Rockies? So let's leave the Upper

36:42

Midwest out of it. Yeah, so we'll go from

36:44

like the hundredths of Meridian west

36:46

or whatever. Kay, in

36:50

what year can

36:52

you say with some certainty there were no wolves

36:56

south of the Canadian border in

36:59

the whole west in the Yeah, in the whole West?

37:01

Well the statement so wolves

37:03

have always trickled down, So I can't

37:05

say there was never a wolf. But

37:07

in terms of a viable breeding surviving.

37:10

Oh no, no, I want to hear about that a little bit.

37:11

Okay, So by they say generally by the nineteen

37:14

thirties wolves were extirpated as

37:16

a viable population in the West. But

37:18

I know of individual people like

37:20

what you just said, who saw wolves, wolf

37:23

tracks a wolf. There

37:25

was a wolf shot in Glacier Park

37:27

in nineteen fifty three. There was another wolf

37:30

shot outside of Bulbridge in nineteen seventy.

37:32

There's individual shot, they get run over, they

37:34

show up. But in terms of

37:37

a viable, reproducing population, nineteen

37:39

thirties is pretty well the date that they've chosen.

37:42

Okay, But

37:44

since from nineteen thirty

37:48

up until they will come to focus on

37:51

when a vible population came Yeah, at any

37:53

time along that there could

37:55

have been singles that

37:57

would come down from camp.

37:58

Yeah, and I hearing from people

38:00

who live over on the on the Rocky Mountain

38:03

Front, the Blackfoot

38:05

Indian Reservation, Glacier Park, it's

38:07

pretty remote, inaccessible, badger

38:09

to med and people have seen

38:12

wolves there more

38:14

commonly than other parts of Montana. And then

38:16

of course they don't survive in eastern Montana because.

38:18

They got nowhere to hide.

38:19

They show up, boom, they're dead.

38:20

Got it.

38:21

So there's been a little bit, but not reproduction.

38:25

Okay, And then when

38:29

did they start coming down and getting a foothold? And how did

38:31

that? How did that work? They keep using

38:33

toll holding foothold, which.

38:34

Is which is there's They don't forget legholds

38:38

anyway, one of my better

38:40

tools. Sorry, did you

38:42

find it?

38:43

Yeah?

38:43

Go ahead.

38:44

A failed attempt by Northern Michigan University

38:46

and the Michigan DNR to reintroduce four

38:49

wolves to the Upper Peninsula occurred in nineteen

38:51

seventy four. See Eventually

38:55

wolves move from Wisconsin to Upper Michigan

38:57

following strong prey

39:00

populations in the early nineties. When'd

39:02

you see that wolf track?

39:03

I saw a wolf track in nineteen ninety four?

39:05

Eastern up that that corroborates

39:08

your your story, Try

39:12

and trap right again.

39:16

That's not far from the final resting place

39:18

of my dog, Duchess.

39:20

Wolves got her?

39:21

Huh Nope, two

39:23

guys named Ben and Matt got her. Oh man,

39:26

yep, well they were supposed

39:28

to. Oh oh, I gotch she was crippled

39:30

up. Oh god, sorry god,

39:32

HER's not the right word.

39:35

Thank you for the back job,

39:38

Brody.

39:38

Thanks.

39:41

So the question was oh

39:44

from nineteen so nineteen thirty there's around

39:47

nineteen thirty, there's no viable population

39:49

of wolves left in the lower in

39:52

the American West.

39:53

Yeah.

39:53

They even went in the parks with poisons and traps

39:55

and rifles and killed all the wolves inside

39:58

Yellowstone and Glacier and

40:00

all the parks. Yeah, they were pretty well gone. Coyotes

40:03

didn't disappear, but wolves did.

40:05

Why is that white

40:07

coyotes stick around?

40:09

I think because they're smaller, they

40:12

have a higher reproductive capacity, they breed

40:14

more often, they're breeding in smaller

40:16

units, and people weren't so focused

40:19

on eradicating coyotes. You

40:21

know, you see a wolf, by god, we've got to

40:23

kill every last one coyote like well whatever,

40:26

it just not doesn't it generate the emotional

40:28

impact of hatred?

40:30

Gotcha?

40:31

What about Mexican gray wolves?

40:32

Were they always?

40:33

Were there always some north of the border or had

40:35

they been eliminated?

40:38

Also?

40:38

It's interesting, so the Mexican wolves

40:41

were basically eliminated except

40:43

in Mexico, and there were a few into

40:46

the southwest, Arizona and New

40:49

Mexico right at the border area. They

40:51

captured every last one. Then they could fund

40:53

find out of the wild. Roy McBride

40:56

went there and I think the last wild capture

40:58

was about nineteen seventy early

41:00

ninety seventies, and they

41:02

moved them into captive breeding facilities

41:05

to help build up the species,

41:07

but their founding population was

41:10

seven. There's

41:12

a lot of genetic concerns obviously

41:14

with a bottleneck of seven. So

41:17

they're always managing and manipulating them

41:19

to try and maximize genetic diversity,

41:21

including taking pups from captivity

41:24

at a young age and then

41:26

finding a den in the wild

41:28

where the mothers got wild pups, and they'll

41:30

go sneak a couple of the captive

41:32

pups like ten days old. However, really

41:34

and with a while once because that has

41:36

the desirable genetics.

41:38

Yeah, I mean, what's that bird? Does that?

41:41

A coward?

41:41

Right?

41:43

They call them a parasite though, instead of an improvement.

41:45

Okay, so

41:49

yeah, So.

41:49

The Mexican wolf, they were pretty well

41:52

gone. And interestingly, one of my first years

41:54

in the Northwark I think it was nineteen eighty, Chuck Johnkle

41:56

brought up a Mexican carnivore

41:59

biologist, Pepe Trevino, and

42:01

he showed me a polar eight you know, photograph

42:04

he brought up of a wolf. It was like in

42:06

a barn or a shed, and he said,

42:08

is that a wolf? Well, yeah, he says, and

42:11

I know it's a wild one because this

42:13

is a Mexican wolf from the Chiuaua area

42:16

of Mexico and it was coming

42:18

to a ranch and it was a

42:20

male wolf and it was bringing deer

42:22

legs and meat to the ranch

42:25

dog, who was a female on spade

42:27

because it was the last mate choice out

42:29

there, and they ended up the rancher

42:32

could have just killed it, everybody did, but he didn't.

42:34

He called some authority said if you don't come take this wolf

42:36

away, we're going to kill it. So they went and captured

42:39

it and held it in his barn until they moved it to

42:41

the zoo. But it's kind of a sad story,

42:44

yeah, the very last one.

42:46

Yeah. But we played

42:48

this on this podcast

42:51

some time ago and it was

42:54

some bird from was I think of some bird

42:56

from Hawaii and

42:59

it was the I

43:01

can't remember some bird species and it was just

43:03

down to one. It was down to a male or a female

43:06

and this bird species with duet

43:10

I heard it. Yeah, And so they

43:12

have this recording of the last

43:15

bird. Let's say it was a male, the

43:18

last male of the species doing the

43:20

duet without his without accompaniment,

43:23

because he like does his part and you wait and

43:25

the female supposed to Yeah,

43:27

and it was gone.

43:28

I heard that.

43:28

It's kind of terrors at you a little bit.

43:30

Yeah.

43:30

Yeah.

43:33

Have you ever heard a guy named Frank Glazer.

43:36

Old Pilot, different guy

43:38

Don, that was Don Glazier, No, I haven't.

43:40

He has a book

43:42

called Alaska's Well, there's a book about him called

43:44

Alaska's Wolfman, huh.

43:46

And he had gone up to He

43:49

gone out to Alaska very early and was a market

43:51

hunter for people building roads and people

43:53

building railroads and whatever, and eventually

43:56

just became this very accomplished

43:59

hunter. And at the time they were

44:01

trying to get they were

44:03

trying to do economic improvement for

44:06

Eskimo groups in northwest

44:09

Alaska, and part of this economic

44:11

improvement plan was to introduce reindeer

44:14

herding, which never never

44:16

really took so

44:19

as they were trying to go into

44:21

Eskimo communities and the fads

44:24

are trying to get Eskimo

44:26

communities establish

44:29

raindeer populations, but they're having the hell of the time

44:31

with wolves, and so Frank

44:34

Glazer, in addition to

44:36

a lot of aerial gunning, was

44:39

doing bait operations

44:43

and he would go into an area

44:45

and get them poison bait yep, strict

44:48

nine. He'd be able to go get them

44:50

all.

44:51

Yes.

44:51

In his book he talks a lot about all the other stuff that would

44:53

turn up at the bait pile,

44:56

a lot of stuff, but it was so affect that he doesn't

44:58

talk about its effectiveness with pois in this

45:00

way, but it was so effective.

45:03

He has some anecdotes in there where he gets them all

45:06

and then someone will say,

45:08

there's this part of it where an Eskimo tells him

45:10

that he saw it's like seven come across

45:13

the ice and it was like six

45:15

white wolves and a black wolf. And

45:17

a couple days later he goes to his bait pile. There's

45:21

six white wolves and a black wolf at the bait

45:23

pile. Just very effective, yes, yeah,

45:26

And even talked about you want to set it on a

45:28

high knob like he's got like he

45:30

took like a real approach to it, you

45:33

know, like he was good at

45:35

poison and wolves.

45:36

He's a good predator, good at poison

45:39

wolf.

45:39

Yeah, yeah, well, I mean poisonous.

45:41

How they wiped the wolves out of the West. It wasn't

45:43

so much traps and guns it was poison. How

45:46

else are you going to get every last one? That's

45:49

it?

45:49

Yeah, when

45:52

they started coming down, what eventually

45:54

what factors eventually led them to you

45:58

know what, what factors led them to kind of get

46:00

a toe hold? Was it ESA protection

46:02

where you were where people were more

46:05

afraid to shoot them because they'd get in a bunch of trouble.

46:08

Yeah, I think I mean Rachel Carson

46:10

and you know, the whole wave of ecology

46:13

and being environmentally a where it started in the late

46:15

sixties, and then the ESA came about, the

46:17

Act came out seventy three, I think

46:19

the final version. Wolves were protected in seventy

46:22

four, and there was just a little

46:24

change of mindset. And the interesting thing

46:26

was that they would find the north

46:28

Fork of the Flathead, you know, right along glacier.

46:30

Because back in the seventies, people

46:33

like myself and other people, they just wanted

46:35

to move to a quiet place where there were a few people

46:38

and could enjoy wildlife and have a simpler life. They

46:40

weren't laggers or hunters

46:42

or ranchers. Well, there were some, there were some, but

46:44

mostly just sort of go back to earthers

46:46

and have a better quality life. So they didn't

46:49

mind wolves, and these wolves happened to find

46:51

that valley, that corridor of

46:53

tolerance, and they that's how

46:55

they found their way. They didn't work on the Rocky

46:57

mount Front, it didn't work in eastern montann

47:00

it didn't work.

47:00

And I know because of cattle, yes.

47:03

And so they found this little zone and they

47:05

were able to one came, and then

47:08

two years later her male came

47:10

and they made it. And then more wolves come

47:12

down. But it was the tolerance of

47:14

the local community that found wolves interesting

47:17

and novel versus dangerous

47:19

and threatening.

47:20

Where were you? Then?

47:21

I came to that valley in nineteen seventy

47:24

nine, the first wolf that survived

47:26

that we got a radio collar on Kishnina. She

47:29

arrived in nineteen the

47:31

fall of seventy eight. We put

47:33

a radio collar in April fourth, nineteen seventy

47:35

nine, and I trapped there for

47:38

forever, just trying to catch more wolves. And there

47:40

weren't other wolves until about two

47:42

years later when this male came down

47:44

and joined her. But the meantime, you

47:46

know, she wanted her out looking for a female

47:49

like that poor bird in the wale. Yeah, looking

47:51

for a male, right, And eventually

47:53

found one and they made it and had

47:56

the pops and so forth. So that process

47:58

just they filtered on

48:01

their own four paws without any

48:03

assistance whatsoever, and no fanfare and

48:05

no people from Washington,

48:07

d C. Carrying crates and they just they

48:09

just walk down. And I think that's why they

48:11

made it there was just socially

48:13

acceptable and tolerant because it wasn't

48:16

forced on anybody.

48:18

You tell that story in your book. Yeah, how

48:20

did you get a collar on that? Or was it collers

48:22

at the time or so.

48:23

The British Columbia Barry

48:26

researcher Bruce McLellan's been up

48:28

doing embarrassed. He's now retired, but he

48:30

saw the wolves and wolf tracks and he contacted

48:32

Bob Riem at the university and Bob

48:36

hired a wolf trapper from Minnesota, Joe

48:38

Smith. Uncommon name, but it was Joe Smith.

48:41

And he came out and set

48:43

traps and caught that wolf. And then I

48:45

came out in September to replace

48:49

the crew that was there and follow her, and I

48:51

was a trapper and to try and catch more wolves.

48:54

And that's kind of how it started. So she

48:56

was already collared, although I know some there

48:58

had one neighbor who didn't really

49:01

like wolves and said that I brought the wolf with me,

49:03

which you know, or

49:05

that a sled dog got loose but

49:08

slid. You know, you don't see sled dogs that are

49:10

three feet off the shoulder with yellow eyes.

49:11

I mean, it's just all the stuff.

49:13

But that was how they got there.

49:15

They walked and she had to come along ways because

49:17

they poisoned off wolves in southern

49:19

BC and Alberta in the

49:22

rockies, just like they did in the States,

49:24

because they were afraid of rabies. And they started poisoning

49:26

wolves in the sixties, late sixties, and

49:28

so.

49:28

There was a zone they were at it late.

49:30

Yeah, there was a.

49:31

Zone when there weren't wolves along the border. There

49:33

weren't wolves in Waterton and vanmf. So this first

49:35

wolf, Chrishtina, may have come from as far as

49:38

Josper, but she came quite a ways. We

49:40

didn't have genetic resources

49:42

back then to determine where she came from.

49:44

Of course now we could if we'd had a sample, but we

49:46

don't have a sample.

49:50

Did you when you say

49:52

you were a wolf trapper, then were you

49:54

trapping problem

49:56

wolves too?

49:59

Yes? No,

50:01

I don't mind at all when I.

50:03

So or whatever word you want to.

50:05

Do well, you'll enjoy the chapter north

50:07

Holm in the book, but did you like the North Holme chapter?

50:10

So I started working with

50:12

wolves as a sty eyed, waistlink

50:14

blonde haired hippie wolf hugging lady

50:17

and I.

50:18

Came from Niver want me through that descriptor

50:20

now story.

50:24

I was a bit enamored

50:26

with wolves. I was a university college student

50:29

Dave Meach, who's like the wolf god. He's

50:31

still working full time at eighty six studying

50:33

wolves. He's published more scientific

50:36

papers than anybody I know. Anyway, I got

50:38

to work on his captive project and

50:40

then I got to go to northern Minnesota and work, and

50:42

I learned how to catch and collar wolves and track

50:44

them. And then I was hired

50:46

as a year after this, so I'm pretty early

50:49

in my career. In nineteen seventy nine, I was hired

50:51

as a livestock depredation

50:53

control trapper and research trapper.

50:56

So when there weren't wolves

50:58

killing livestock, I went out and form and

51:00

collared wolves that were just wild and added to

51:02

the database for stie Fritz was post

51:04

docking PhD stuff. So my job

51:08

picture you live in North Holme. Picture, you're

51:10

a conservative guy from Michigan with

51:12

a few cows and you have a few acres and

51:14

some young blonde galoy's going

51:16

to come up and save you from.

51:18

The wolves, right.

51:19

I mean it was a hard roto. So

51:23

that was my job and I

51:26

learned so much that summer. It was so

51:28

important to my career development

51:30

and having me be in the middle finger as you described,

51:33

of behavior of

51:36

public wolves reaction

51:38

on my part. So there were truly

51:41

farmers, they don't call them Rochester farmers

51:43

that had chronic depredation problems and there were some

51:45

farmers that had none. I worked with both,

51:48

but getting into that community was

51:51

real challenging, and I

51:54

could tell stories forever about that.

51:57

How would you generally handle those situations?

52:00

Okay, example, I try to use

52:02

there's no point in feeding them a lot

52:04

of scientific data.

52:07

They don't care. You just have to work with

52:09

them and develop a relationship. I use my

52:11

sense of humor. There was like, for example,

52:13

I was working in there and I

52:15

kind of stayed on my own and I tried to stay

52:17

away from people, just do my job because

52:20

I was young in inexperience and I kind of didn't

52:22

want them to know that.

52:23

Right.

52:24

Well, one day I'm at the gas station that a

52:26

guy pumping gas. They've actually pumped your

52:28

gas back. Then says, you know, you got to pick

52:31

up the local paper and see what Bing wrote

52:33

about you. I said, well, who's Bing girl.

52:36

He's what he's like close to

52:38

God. He writes our local news column

52:40

and the weekly paper, and he knows all the goings

52:42

on. So I go buy the paper

52:44

and I open it up and there's

52:47

being being Elhard's column

52:49

and he talks about who visited who and what they

52:51

were having the church bazaar at and then he says,

52:53

and by the way, we have a

52:56

new community member. There's

52:58

an attractive, young blonde lady

53:00

wolf Trapper. And

53:03

next exact quote and next

53:05

to his words, he had

53:08

a photograph of a six foot

53:10

tall cardboard cut out wolf

53:12

and he's got his arm around it and is sitting outside

53:15

at his house and he says, Lady wolf

53:17

Trapper, I have a problem. Wolf's

53:21

like, what do you do?

53:22

Right?

53:22

I'm twenty four years old. I'm like, oh my God,

53:25

and knowing that how I deal with this

53:27

guy is going to make or break my summer.

53:29

So I thought about it really hard. I

53:33

went home. I mate took out a bunch of cardboard

53:35

and tools, and I built a

53:37

perfect replica of a nun

53:40

fourteen new house wolf trap,

53:42

complete with double long springs made out

53:44

of cardboard and a fake chain made like your kids

53:47

make the Christmas loop chains. And I wrapped

53:49

it in black electric tape so it looked like it had been

53:51

dyed black like a real trap. And I got

53:53

a jar of my stinkiest wolf bait and I crammed

53:55

it full of cardboard. I drive to

53:57

his house the next day and I pulled up

54:00

in the government truck and he comes out in

54:02

his porch and he kind of stands there it smirks,

54:04

and he crosses his arm and says,

54:06

well, you must be the lady wolf trapper.

54:09

And I said, yes, sir, I am. Please meet

54:11

you. I'm Diane Boyd. And he says, say

54:13

you get to take care of my problem wolf. I

54:16

said, I am. And I walk around the back of my truck

54:18

and I pull out this cardboard trap

54:21

and the corrugated cardboard stinky goo.

54:23

And I walk over and I say, so

54:25

this this trap, in this bait,

54:28

will I guarantee we will catch

54:30

yours particular subspecies of wolf

54:32

that's causing you your problem. And I reach

54:34

out with it like this, and he stands

54:37

there and he looks at me like for Mediani

54:39

five feet away, and

54:41

he just kind of stands there, and then finally he

54:43

breaks. Soon his granny comes over and he puts

54:46

his hand on my shoulder, says, come on in. The

54:48

wife just took a pie out of the oven, and

54:51

I sat there and had blueberry pie

54:54

with him and tea and coffee,

54:56

and we chatted quite a bit. And the next

54:58

week in his column put a photograph

55:01

of my trap and he said, the

55:03

lady Trapper come paid me a visit, and

55:05

my problems taken care of. And you know what, he

55:07

actually said some nice things about me in his

55:09

column. With the rest of the summer, when I'd catch a wolf, he'd

55:12

put it in the column. And so it's

55:14

like, that's how I work in the community. You can't

55:16

fight it. Just put

55:18

your head down, think hard, and move forward

55:21

and try and do something a little creative. Just

55:23

you asked. That's just one of the stories.

55:25

But yeah, that's good career advice

55:27

for everybody.

55:29

Just be a pain in the neck.

55:33

When that was happening and the wolves were coming

55:36

down, Let's talk about that scenario

55:38

that you said. You know, we might have

55:40

eventually landed where we landed.

55:42

There's no way it would have been the same timeline.

55:44

Right, Probably not, But you

55:46

know, once so once

55:48

we had our first wolf in seventy nine. By

55:51

nineteen ninety five without any reintroductions,

55:54

just simply not trapping, poisoning and shooting

55:56

them. By nineteen ninety five,

55:59

just before the post wolves in the Yellowstone

56:01

in central Idol, we had seventy seventy

56:03

five wolves in eight packs with nobody

56:05

reintroducing them. Doc northwest

56:08

Montana Marion nine

56:10

mile callous spell all through

56:12

northwestern and western Montana.

56:15

The Marian wolves became famous because they started

56:18

killing livestock in the It

56:20

was about late late eighties, so they

56:23

were there and because nobody

56:26

forced them out, they were just kind of existing.

56:28

In those wolves that cause problems, you know,

56:30

shoot shovels shot up, and the other ones kind

56:32

of left to be. So in

56:34

the nineties there were wolves dispersing.

56:37

One of my telling those numbers again, so

56:39

the number of wolves, yeah, pre reintroduction.

56:42

So by nineteen ninety five there

56:44

were about seventy to seventy five wolves in Montana

56:47

in eight packs. And if you go back to the old

56:49

US fish and Wilife Service website.

56:51

You can find the data there. It's published. I'm not making

56:53

this up. I mean I don't. I only

56:56

talk truth and my book is Stories

56:58

of Truth. So they were there.

57:00

They had collars on. Sometimes this

57:02

one pack was giving a guy at livestock

57:05

producer problems, but mostly they were

57:07

just making a living. There were wolves on the Rocky Mountain

57:09

front. They were moving down

57:12

and they were as far as Missoula, the Nine Mile

57:14

Wolves, I'm sure you heard of them. So

57:16

the wolves before they were introduced

57:18

them to Yellowstone, there were two wolves

57:21

that had gotten there already pre nineteen

57:23

ninety five. One was shot

57:25

just south of Fox.

57:27

Creek fire you had gotten a Yellowstone.

57:29

Yeah, and one was filmed, yes, So that was

57:31

like nineteen ninety one ninety two. So

57:34

it's just like Colorado. Those wolves

57:36

came from Wyoming and Colorado

57:38

now and they found their way down

57:41

and they began reproducing, and

57:43

then the reintroduction happed on top of it, which

57:45

is what happened with Wyoming. With a

57:48

Yellowstone in central Idahole. So the wolves

57:50

were starting to get down and the reintroduction

57:52

happened on top of them. But the two that were seeing

57:56

didn't survive long enough to reproduce. They weren't

57:58

viable, they didn't have packs. They were just sort

58:00

of passing through, just like we saw in Montana

58:03

a lot prior to Kishnina

58:05

and the successful breeding.

58:09

Uh, it's gonna sound like a

58:11

dumb question because I know it's probably

58:13

not too challenging, but uh,

58:16

when they kill Kyle's what when they kill Kyle's

58:18

how do they generally approach it?

58:21

You mean domestic cattle, not Kyle.

58:23

Sorry, yeah, kill cattle.

58:25

It depends on how many wolves are, depends

58:27

on the experience of the wolves. But in every kill

58:29

is different. I just remember in Minnesota I had to go skin

58:32

a lot of really disgusting, maggotty carcasses

58:34

of cows and haffers. If it's a calf,

58:36

they basically eat at all, so there's not much

58:38

to fined. You might find an ear tag

58:40

in a pile of scat or something, it's

58:43

hard to prove they were there. But

58:45

the big cole, you find bites. They're

58:48

pretty effective predators. It again,

58:51

the hind, the belly,

58:54

the neck. Sometimes they're not.

58:57

They're not efficient killers

58:59

like lions. I mean lions live

59:01

alone because they can kill an Alkalholm. A wolf

59:03

pack needs other members because they don't have

59:06

fit sabers on four pods to help them

59:08

hold and contain their prey. They just have teeth.

59:11

Do they key in on calving

59:14

season for cattle?

59:15

I have always wondered why they don't more? I

59:17

mean they can, yeah,

59:20

because.

59:20

It seemed like those wolves that were reintroduced

59:22

in Colorado. Yeah, just this past

59:25

Calvia, they really that's when they really

59:27

started to get in some trouble.

59:29

Yes, and those wolves

59:32

before they were transplanted,

59:34

they were livestock killers. So yeah,

59:37

if there's calves around and cattle

59:40

wolves, you will know there are wolves

59:42

there. If you know, if you're gonna have problems, you have

59:44

them. But not every wolf is a livestock

59:47

killer. And sometimes they might

59:49

kill a calf or two and never have a problem.

59:51

Sometimes they might come in and kill repeatedly

59:53

until you remove the wolves. It really depends

59:55

on the situation, and it kind of depends on

59:57

how their ranchers managing

1:00:00

their livestock herd. Do they ever heard or out there?

1:00:02

Do they have guard dogs? Are they turned out

1:00:04

in a national forest and a grazing lease in

1:00:06

May and then they're not picked up till October nobody

1:00:09

looks at them. I mean, you know, it really

1:00:11

depends on the management of the stock a lot.

1:00:15

Uh. You just said something

1:00:17

that I can't

1:00:19

remember with the hell you're talking about,

1:00:23

but it caught my attention. Oh,

1:00:25

I know, can can one

1:00:28

I guess what I was kind of getting at. Can

1:00:30

one do it effectively?

1:00:33

Depends and if you're talking or can they kill it one

1:00:35

adult? Coll effect?

1:00:36

Can one wolf kill one adult kyle? Do you ever see?

1:00:38

That'd be tough. The kyle would probably have to

1:00:40

have something wrong with it, but it's

1:00:42

usually more than one.

1:00:44

And then you just get a hold of it and hang on to it.

1:00:46

Basically.

1:00:47

Yeah.

1:00:48

Yeah, When did.

1:00:50

You say that Colorado put in known livestock

1:00:52

killers. Yeah, explain

1:00:56

what that means. And if that's like you're not in

1:00:58

your head that is that behavior?

1:01:00

Do you feel like it's

1:01:02

hard to unlearn that?

1:01:03

What I would say is, if I wanted to reintroduce

1:01:05

wolves with minimal problems, I would see

1:01:09

wolves that have only had wild meat.

1:01:11

It's like the wolves that were introduced to Yellowstone

1:01:14

and Central Idaho were taken from Canada where

1:01:16

they had never been exposed to livestock,

1:01:18

but they had never been exposed to buffalo either.

1:01:21

I mean, they're pretty good at killing bison now they

1:01:23

had to learn it because they're very formidable.

1:01:25

I wouldn't want to try and kill a bison with my teeth.

1:01:28

But so I think

1:01:31

I don't know all the background and why they

1:01:33

chose those wolves. They probably had a shortage

1:01:35

supplies and a shortage of time

1:01:38

to get the job done, and they had this opportunity

1:01:40

to get those wolves. They weren't all livestock

1:01:43

killers, but the ones that are causing the

1:01:45

problem now had a history before

1:01:47

they were put there.

1:01:50

What is the I'm a little I

1:01:52

haven't followed it as closely. What

1:01:55

is going on with the ones they put in Colorado?

1:01:57

Like, how has that gone? How many and what are they

1:01:59

doing?

1:01:59

Oh boy, it's a big exact numbers. I

1:02:01

couldn't tell you. I'm not that involved. But there's

1:02:03

a male I forgot

1:02:06

his number. They put him in and he's paired

1:02:08

with a female. They had at least one pup,

1:02:10

and I saw on my news fees this morning they've seen

1:02:12

three, now three pups

1:02:14

in this particular pack, but they had only documented

1:02:17

one up until yesterday or whatever. And

1:02:19

they were put in at the end of the year,

1:02:22

like December or so, and they

1:02:24

started killing livestock in April.

1:02:26

I believe it was when the pups were born. And

1:02:29

they're now

1:02:31

debating how are they going to manage the situation.

1:02:34

They no matter what CPW

1:02:36

does, they aren't be a happy,

1:02:38

winning outcome, because if they remove

1:02:40

all the wolves and kill them all, you're gonna have the

1:02:43

wolf protectionists screaming

1:02:45

at him. If they don't do anything, they're gonna

1:02:47

have the livestock growers scream at him if they take

1:02:50

I actually had this conversation with the journalist yesterday.

1:02:53

He says, well, how about if we just take one,

1:02:56

say we know the male has been a livestock

1:02:58

killer, can the female survive

1:03:01

long and protect and feed those

1:03:03

pups without help? And

1:03:06

I said, well, I can give you two examples. In

1:03:08

nineteen eighty two, when Kishnina

1:03:10

had her first litter of pups in the Flathead in

1:03:12

fifty years, her

1:03:15

mate was killed in June and those pups were

1:03:18

seven eight weeks old, and he

1:03:21

was killed accidentally by the Grizzly bear

1:03:24

trap people. She was caught in a Grizzly

1:03:26

bersonaire and he subsequently

1:03:28

died accidental

1:03:31

death and still just as dead

1:03:33

though, so the female had Yeah, so

1:03:36

doesn't him. It's kind of like got

1:03:38

your dog right. Anyway, the

1:03:40

female had seven pups to deal with,

1:03:42

and he raised kids, and you raised

1:03:46

dogs. You know how much food they start to

1:03:48

consume as they become teenagers. Oh my god,

1:03:50

talk about a full time job trying to feed seven

1:03:53

growing pups that are fifty sixty pounds by

1:03:55

fall, and I thought they're not can never make

1:03:57

it. They all made it through winter. We

1:04:00

were seeing tracks of eight wolves

1:04:02

in the snow. So there's one example.

1:04:04

The other example was so that was keeping

1:04:07

the female remaining. And then in the nine Mile

1:04:09

in the early recolonization, those

1:04:11

wolves got to nine Mile, Montana on their own

1:04:14

near Missoula. The male and female

1:04:16

had pups. The mother was poached

1:04:18

over Memorial Day, which is pretty early. So

1:04:20

those little guys were maybe

1:04:23

four maybe five weeks old. They

1:04:25

were probably still drinking milk from mom, but

1:04:27

they already had getting regurgitated food certainly,

1:04:30

so it only had the male to raise the whole litter of

1:04:32

pops. And Mike and Mannis

1:04:35

who was studying him at that time, and Barto,

1:04:37

Gary University, do you know, bloody bart

1:04:39

Barto Gary.

1:04:41

He's passed now, but he was the

1:04:43

most vary, the most voracious

1:04:46

hunter right now.

1:04:46

We loved him. He's a university exactly.

1:04:48

We call him Bloody Bart.

1:04:50

I can tell you stories.

1:04:51

He whatever he shot, he would kill. So he had

1:04:53

the had permission to go shoot

1:04:55

deer or pick up roadkill to supplemently

1:04:58

feed those pups because they were fully

1:05:00

in danger. This would be like nineteen eighty eight

1:05:02

or so to do anything fishing.

1:05:04

Walley Service was mandated under

1:05:07

the essay to do what they could to keep

1:05:09

them alive as an endangered species. So they got

1:05:11

these permits to go do that. That

1:05:13

male raise those pups without a female,

1:05:15

and they all survived. So yes, the wolves

1:05:18

are incredibly resilient. So then

1:05:20

this journalist asked me yesterday, so should

1:05:22

they take the male or the female? I'm like, oh

1:05:24

my god, you're asking me a Sophie's choice

1:05:27

question.

1:05:27

I can't tell you.

1:05:30

And you know, we talked about it at

1:05:32

length. And starting with two

1:05:35

wolves adults that have both been killing

1:05:37

livestock, and then you're going to take one

1:05:39

wolf away to try

1:05:41

and hopefully minimize it, you might be

1:05:43

causing more of a problem because the remaining

1:05:46

parent now has the burden

1:05:48

solely of feeding hungry pops,

1:05:50

and maybe it's going to kill more livestock

1:05:52

because of that.

1:05:53

And those pups are going to learn to do it too.

1:05:55

Yeah, this is the problem. So it's I

1:05:58

just think maybe thinking

1:06:01

ahead a little bit ahead

1:06:03

of time may have headed

1:06:06

this problem off. But it's amazing to me that

1:06:08

all those wolves they put out, they only had one

1:06:10

reproducing pack. You think they would have had

1:06:12

more. But this is a problem.

1:06:14

How many did they put down?

1:06:15

Ten total? I think?

1:06:17

And then are all ten still alive?

1:06:19

One of them got killed by a mountain lion, which is

1:06:21

kind of ironic. It's usually the.

1:06:23

Other way around.

1:06:24

Yeah, yeah, but I'm not there

1:06:26

may have been another one that died

1:06:28

somehow.

1:06:29

The mountain lion got one. I think I knew that.

1:06:31

Maybe I forgot it, but I think most of them are

1:06:34

still.

1:06:34

There, and they formed one reproducing pack.

1:06:36

Yeah, it's surprising to me because they did it

1:06:39

before breeding season and then they'll be reintroducing

1:06:41

more wolves. And of course you heard Washington State

1:06:44

is now refusing to give them more wolves. It's becoming

1:06:46

this huge political.

1:06:48

But they got I thought they got him from the nets person there.

1:06:50

They got him from Oregon originally

1:06:53

and one of the well not the state, might have been

1:06:55

the nests person that originally said yes,

1:06:57

we'll contribute to but that just got

1:07:00

They just said we're not doing it

1:07:02

right.

1:07:04

One they had from Oregon, I

1:07:06

think state in the state, but

1:07:09

I wasn't the new ones. Weren't they going to get

1:07:11

the next batch from Washington? Wasn't it was?

1:07:14

I think it was it was a tribe

1:07:17

where that whoever it was, just

1:07:19

said Nope, we're out.

1:07:21

We're not doing What is the argument to not

1:07:23

let them have them?

1:07:25

Politics?

1:07:25

I'm sure explain the politics. You

1:07:32

know it's politics, but you don't know what.

1:07:35

She doesn't study politics.

1:07:38

So I'm just saying every decision made about

1:07:40

wolves is based on politics. It's not

1:07:43

based on biology.

1:07:44

So why of

1:07:46

course, because biology is

1:07:49

largely politics. When

1:07:51

people say like I don't want to be political or everything's.

1:07:54

Political, everything is political.

1:07:56

There's nothing that's not political, right,

1:07:59

I mean every decision is political. I know,

1:08:01

creating national Force was intensely political.

1:08:04

Yeah, Like, what's not political?

1:08:08

I mean most actions are taken by elected

1:08:10

representatives in this country or

1:08:12

appointed appointed

1:08:14

by elected.

1:08:16

Everything is I know, we

1:08:18

don't have to go there.

1:08:20

No I mean, but it's like I don't like earlier, I had

1:08:22

a headache and I took two ivy profen that

1:08:24

are like two hundred and fifty milligram ibuprofene.

1:08:26

The fact that you can go by two hundred fifty

1:08:28

gram milligram ivy profen

1:08:30

is I don't know the history on it. That's probably

1:08:32

political, Oh, no, doubt.

1:08:36

So I would guess because there's I would

1:08:38

guess that because the Colorado

1:08:40

reintroduction has had a lot

1:08:42

of problems.

1:08:43

The Native Americans say yeah, I'm

1:08:45

sorry, and.

1:08:45

The Native Americans are probably saying, you know, we just

1:08:48

don't want to deal with it. So I wrote

1:08:50

A I was telling you honest. I wrote A was

1:08:52

asked to write a document for the National Walley

1:08:54

Federation about

1:08:57

Wolve's returning to Colorado. And it's basically

1:08:59

called less and is learned from everywhere else for

1:09:02

the Colorado can use as a base

1:09:04

as a template for reintroductions, and

1:09:07

sixty pages long. It's on It's

1:09:09

on the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website.

1:09:11

Is that in a in your book?

1:09:13

No, No, it's not.

1:09:16

It's stabled into the end of your book.

1:09:17

No.

1:09:18

Maybe you can read the audio version of that when.

1:09:22

God anyway, it

1:09:24

laid out all of the problems that challenges

1:09:27

people have had elsewhere where the wolves are

1:09:29

coming back on their own or reintroduced,

1:09:31

How agencies federal and state dealt

1:09:33

with them, how local communities dealt with them,

1:09:36

how conservation groups and

1:09:38

and uh a DC or

1:09:40

animal it's no longer that. Now it's wildlife

1:09:42

services work together sometimes

1:09:45

or not. Just all these things. There's

1:09:47

a template. There's nothing that needs to be

1:09:49

reinvented about wolves being on the landscape.

1:09:52

It's it's old hat.

1:09:54

So this is pretty interesting. The Colorado

1:09:56

things, Yeah, the

1:09:58

they were going to get them from the Colville Nation fifteen

1:10:01

of the moment, that's Washington, Washington. The

1:10:03

Colville Nation said no because

1:10:06

Colorado Parks and Wildlife wouldn't

1:10:08

agree to give the Southern You Tribe

1:10:12

like management over wolves

1:10:14

on the Southern You tribes.

1:10:16

Oh, political

1:10:18

out of tribal solid area.

1:10:21

That that's an interesting point. Thank you for

1:10:23

clear that clarification. I knew it had something to

1:10:25

do with people, and I knew it wasn't.

1:10:27

Yeah, I bet it had

1:10:29

something to do always.

1:10:34

I want to get back into some of this. I want to ask you another

1:10:36

question that that Karin highlighted, it's

1:10:39

a good one. Uh, you're

1:10:42

familiar with the like with

1:10:44

grizzly bears, you're from with the distinct population

1:10:47

segments. Okay, that there's so they

1:10:49

it's kind of like looking at part

1:10:52

of this whole idea is with grizzly

1:10:54

bears is being like, Okay, when we're talking about grizzly

1:10:56

bears being on the landscape,

1:10:59

where could they actually be?

1:11:02

Like what areas could actually support bears?

1:11:04

Right?

1:11:05

I mean ecologically?

1:11:06

Yeah, yeah, I mean there's a handful of everythings. But

1:11:08

I was gonna bring up that there's a there's a distinct population

1:11:11

segment that doesn't have bears, but it

1:11:13

could where

1:11:15

it's.

1:11:16

The bitter Well

1:11:18

they've taken getting there.

1:11:20

Yeah, they're getting there.

1:11:22

And there was at a time there's talk of putting them there.

1:11:24

Yes, Okay, so if

1:11:28

you were gonna

1:11:33

maybe I set that up the wrong way. Let me just let me skip

1:11:35

all that crap about the DPS.

1:11:36

Okay, if if

1:11:38

you were going to make a map, if you were going to

1:11:40

make a map of

1:11:44

the United States, all

1:11:47

of it, Okay, and

1:11:50

and I said, uh, Diane, go in

1:11:52

and and and color

1:11:55

in the areas where

1:11:57

you think there's

1:11:59

a chance of having

1:12:02

viable wolf populations,

1:12:04

meaning there's enough habitat,

1:12:09

enough wild food, low

1:12:11

enough chance of intense friction.

1:12:15

Right, how would you start to color that

1:12:17

map?

1:12:18

Well, the last qualifier just put on is

1:12:20

the deciding factor for everything. I mean there's oh

1:12:23

god, yeah, I mean so historically

1:12:27

wolves had the widest distribution of any

1:12:29

mammal in the world except for humans. I

1:12:31

mean they live from the Arctic to

1:12:33

the desert. They live in every biome,

1:12:35

every habitat. They can eat anything

1:12:38

their habitat. Journalists, they're

1:12:40

food generalists. They're like a you

1:12:42

know, one hundred pound kayah that way. So

1:12:45

they can live anywhere, I mean they did. I mean

1:12:47

they covered the entire United States, so where

1:12:49

could they live. They would live anywhere

1:12:51

where us humans will tolerate them. And they're trying

1:12:54

to get back. I mean wolves are showing up

1:12:56

in Illinois and Missouri and you

1:12:58

know they just get shot, and

1:13:01

but they would be there. I mean they

1:13:04

would. They would find a way to live

1:13:06

in Central Park if we didn't kill them.

1:13:09

They'd be eating poodles and whatever out there.

1:13:11

But there's not who knows, so squirrels

1:13:13

RFK.

1:13:14

You have to lay it dead one of those, yeah,

1:13:18

on the trail.

1:13:20

So that's a hard question because

1:13:22

they would live everywhere, So we don't

1:13:24

have to color in a map because they just color and everything.

1:13:27

I mean, I get to that last qualifier.

1:13:29

Yeah, then then you have to constrict it. So the wolves

1:13:32

has shown us now in

1:13:34

Montana. Anyway, Let's pick Montana because

1:13:36

they're all sitting here and thinking about Montana. So

1:13:38

wolves basically live in the western one third

1:13:41

or one quarter, and they've been

1:13:43

doing this for decades now

1:13:45

because that's where we tolerate them. But

1:13:48

they keep showing up at Miles City

1:13:50

and I Galaca and they get

1:13:52

shot and they don't make it.

1:13:55

That's not an ecological issue at

1:13:57

all. They would live there. They did, so

1:14:00

I don't know.

1:14:01

Well they did under

1:14:04

different circumstances. Okay, let me let me requalify.

1:14:06

Okay, let me requalify, because it's going to throw

1:14:08

out. Did you say Cleveland earlier? Did I make that up?

1:14:11

I didn't hear Cleveland.

1:14:13

You said something Missouri, she

1:14:15

said, Let me let me

1:14:17

read. Let me read you my qualification and

1:14:20

not live on that. Somehow

1:14:23

we make this deal. Humans

1:14:25

can't kill them, but

1:14:28

they can't eat any human generated

1:14:30

food sources. Cool, now.

1:14:34

Hit me, there

1:14:37

would be nowhere. No,

1:14:39

I'm serious, because the only pack

1:14:41

that I'm aware in Montana

1:14:45

that has never come into contact

1:14:47

with livestock is the

1:14:49

one up in northwest corner Glacia National

1:14:51

Park. And there is livestock in

1:14:53

his southern portion of the Norfolk

1:14:55

or there was Ladenburg sold this stuff. But

1:14:59

other than that, the can always come into contact

1:15:01

with people who are raising sled dugs,

1:15:03

people of lama farms, people of livestock,

1:15:06

chickens, whatever. Just because

1:15:08

we've taken over all the while life.

1:15:10

Happened at could they make a go

1:15:12

of it without causing too much trouble? And like

1:15:14

Maine New Hamps, like the

1:15:16

Upper.

1:15:17

Yeah, I'm not going to give up on this map idea.

1:15:20

I can.

1:15:20

It seems like main they

1:15:23

could. There's certainly plenty of white.

1:15:24

Tails there, right, they'd have to get there.

1:15:27

Yeah, Okay,

1:15:29

stop being so obstructionist. Somebody

1:15:35

you understand what I'm trying to ask.

1:15:37

No, I don't. Actually, I'm not.

1:15:39

Steve coming semi full of wolves

1:15:42

loose and Maine where

1:15:44

can moose?

1:15:44

Okay, let me let me say this. Okay,

1:15:47

I'm not trying to I'm trying to color

1:15:50

in the country of where however you

1:15:52

want to put it? Man, where could you visualize?

1:15:55

Where do you think when the dust

1:15:57

is settled in a hundred years,

1:16:00

And don't don't hit me with like, well, you

1:16:02

know, is there a zombie apocalypse or in

1:16:05

a hundred years? Where are wolves?

1:16:08

If they lived where there weren't human conflicts?

1:16:11

No, no, no, forget all those, OK, meaning

1:16:14

new direction? Yeah, meaning

1:16:16

it appears that it

1:16:18

wound up being that northwest

1:16:21

Montana was a suitable

1:16:23

place for wolves.

1:16:24

Yeah, it is right.

1:16:25

It wound up being that

1:16:27

the northern Great Lakes, Yeah, the

1:16:30

northern third of Minnesota, the northern

1:16:32

third of Wisconsin, the northern

1:16:35

third of Michigan wound up being like a

1:16:37

pretty good like it is from the wolves

1:16:39

perspective, a good place for wolves.

1:16:40

Yeah.

1:16:41

What are the chunks that are probably

1:16:43

like that that don't

1:16:46

yet but could.

1:16:49

It's it's hard to answer because I'm

1:16:52

not Anvoidum. I'm just saying they go everywhere, and

1:16:54

they get shot, they go

1:16:56

to eastern Montana, So I would color in eastern

1:16:58

Montana. They don't make one hundred years

1:17:01

from out, They're not going to make it either.

1:17:02

So I met him.

1:17:03

I'm at a lost kind. I'm not trying to avoid. I'm at

1:17:05

a loss how to answer. They would live in Illinois,

1:17:08

they would live in Missouri because there's plenty of

1:17:10

places where there's enough habitat

1:17:13

for them. They just for habitat all. They needed someplace

1:17:16

where they find large hooftungulates,

1:17:18

they don't get shot by people, and

1:17:21

they have a secure place to raise pups. There's plenty

1:17:23

of places throughout the country

1:17:25

like that.

1:17:26

Do you think we've reached, like

1:17:29

we've filled in the areas that people well,

1:17:32

that people are going to tolerate, Like they're

1:17:34

where they are now, and they're probably not going to

1:17:36

be in a lot of new places.

1:17:38

I disagree.

1:17:39

No, I'm asking like,

1:17:41

like will there like are

1:17:44

they where they are now? And that's probably

1:17:46

all the space.

1:17:47

I think there would be more wolves expanding

1:17:49

across Montana, certainly. I mean they're showing up

1:17:51

in the Snowy's and they're showing up all over

1:17:54

and if they can get a foothold and have a pack,

1:17:56

then at some point, if you're hunting and trapping

1:17:58

them, there always be a few remaining. But

1:18:01

this stronghold is the western portion because

1:18:03

it's mountainous, because they're not seen because there's

1:18:05

less road access, because there's the Bob, the

1:18:07

Glacier Park, to scapegoat wilderness. Those

1:18:10

are all those things that these wolves

1:18:12

need to live. I don't see that. There's

1:18:16

a lot of places that are very wild across

1:18:18

the eastern Montana bird hunt, an lo hunt. But

1:18:21

there's always a conflict there. There

1:18:23

just always is with livestock, with

1:18:26

hunters, with whatever goes on. And

1:18:28

I'd love to hear what you think. So in terms

1:18:30

of mapping, right now, wolves are all the way through

1:18:32

Minnesota. You got wolves around the Twin Cities. Now

1:18:34

you don't know maybe you don't know that, but they're

1:18:37

filling into southern Wisconsin. They are moving

1:18:39

south. It's a really slow wave. Nobody's

1:18:42

reintroducing them. I got to point that out. It's

1:18:44

on their own and they have been making

1:18:46

it to the other states but get killed. So what

1:18:49

because I don't kind of totally maybe get

1:18:51

your question, or maybe I'm less optimistic

1:18:54

than you, where do you see them going

1:18:56

where they aren't? Oh,

1:18:58

Utah would be a place about it.

1:19:00

It's funny you say that. It's funny you say Utah

1:19:02

because I was at an event. I

1:19:06

was at an event this winter and

1:19:08

Utah's governor spoke at the event, and

1:19:11

Utah's governor made a pledge to the audience

1:19:15

that there would be no wolves

1:19:18

in Utah. And I remember

1:19:20

thinking, I don't know that that's your call.

1:19:24

What he mean that

1:19:27

he means.

1:19:30

He was saying and

1:19:32

addressing the audience, which was an

1:19:34

audience of of uh

1:19:38

people that do a lot of work for big game

1:19:40

habitat improvement, right, big

1:19:43

horns, sheet mule deer or whatever, putting

1:19:45

it, putting ungulates on the ground, putting

1:19:47

game animals on the ground. He made

1:19:49

a pledge that there will be no wolves in Utah,

1:19:51

and I remember thinking.

1:19:53

Like, don't worry hunters.

1:19:54

Yeah, but I remember thinking, well, the way it sits

1:19:56

now with federal protection, that's

1:19:59

not really your call. And I don't know what. I appreciate

1:20:02

the sentiment, but I don't know what tools you have at

1:20:04

your disposal.

1:20:05

So I get that what you're saying,

1:20:07

but that agrees with what I say, because

1:20:10

wolves have made it to Utah. And

1:20:12

we had a wolf go from Yellowstone, go

1:20:15

all the way to the Grand Canyon and

1:20:17

started on its way back, a colored wolf from

1:20:19

Wyoming from Yellowstone and they got

1:20:21

shot on the way home. They get shot.

1:20:23

I don't know how to better tell you,

1:20:26

but they just get So maybe.

1:20:27

He said that he was just saying if

1:20:29

they come, we can. Wasn't that he's going to do

1:20:31

something, that's just someone's going to

1:20:33

shoot.

1:20:34

But I think that's what he's writing.

1:20:36

Yeah, people will kill them.

1:20:37

I think what you're saying too, though, is that I

1:20:40

mean there are areas of the country that have

1:20:43

other than Northwest Montana, that have sufficient

1:20:47

habitat security, like

1:20:49

you in a hundred years, you

1:20:52

know, I would imagine all the way

1:20:54

down the spine of.

1:20:55

The Rockies right.

1:20:59

Over maybe the Cascades down

1:21:02

I don't know that they go down the Sierras, you know,

1:21:04

like they have Like that's what.

1:21:05

I question is California. Yeah,

1:21:08

California would be maybe a little more

1:21:10

tolerant. They have they

1:21:12

have six

1:21:14

packs or something.

1:21:16

And if I asked you my question twenty years

1:21:18

ago that you're trying to like dodge and obfuscate,

1:21:20

I'm not if I had asked that question twenty

1:21:22

years ago, would you have said, would you have said Lake

1:21:24

Tahoe.

1:21:27

I think wolves have a good chance of being in

1:21:29

Utah except people kill them. So I don't know if that's

1:21:31

a yes or no, that's a yes, okay, And

1:21:35

I'm really trying to it's not I'm

1:21:37

not squirming, I'm not uncomfortable. I'm just saying

1:21:40

I have lived with wolf killing for

1:21:42

so long, and where they're going to be tolerated

1:21:45

is where they're at. And wolves getting

1:21:47

in California's great, but they're going to start killing

1:21:49

people's pets and they're

1:21:51

going to be not tolerated as

1:21:53

well.

1:21:53

What about like the wolves? If the Colorado

1:21:56

plan goes, is they some people

1:21:58

would like it to go. They're they're gonna

1:22:01

push into New Mexico, Arizonah.

1:22:04

Yeah, So my question is what happens to

1:22:06

those Mexican wolves then?

1:22:07

So I love this question and half

1:22:09

a finger and I will disagree on this.

1:22:11

So okay, can you guys, can one of you make

1:22:13

the question really clear for people? Because I think a lot of people

1:22:15

aren't to understand.

1:22:16

What they're I think she's probably the better.

1:22:18

Yeah, do you mind, like why we're even asking

1:22:20

that? Like what we're talking about.

1:22:21

As I explained about the Mexican wolves there, they

1:22:24

are a unique subspecies. It's the only

1:22:26

population really that's got its separate subspecies

1:22:28

classification for protection other than the

1:22:30

red wolves, which are a different animal. So they

1:22:33

come from a very unique gene

1:22:36

pool of seven founding members.

1:22:38

They're trying to protect that gene pool. So

1:22:40

if you read I mean every time a Mexican wolf

1:22:43

starts to go north, it disperses like

1:22:46

a wolf is gonna do. They live by their

1:22:48

feet and they go north, they go and

1:22:50

catch them and bring them back. They don't allow them.

1:22:53

Oh yeah, they don't allow them

1:22:55

to travel out of the recovery area. What

1:22:58

you could google the on, but they don't

1:23:01

allow it because that

1:23:03

if.

1:23:03

One of the Mexican wolves out of Mexican

1:23:06

Wolf area, they fetch it and bring it home.

1:23:08

Yes, it's a defined zone and

1:23:10

so and so because number

1:23:13

one, that was the promise early on with the plan. But

1:23:15

they've expanded the Mexican Wolf Recovery area

1:23:17

slightly, but they don't want those

1:23:19

wolves to mix with other gene pools.

1:23:22

And those Colorado wolves

1:23:24

will eventually make it down to

1:23:26

four corners and come down and they

1:23:28

will approach and get in. I would soon

1:23:31

get to the Mexican wolf population. And

1:23:33

then what are people going to do. They're going to start killing

1:23:35

one wolf species subspecies to protect

1:23:38

the other one. I think

1:23:40

I mean, you've had some really good genetic

1:23:42

people on your programs. I've so enjoyed their discussions.

1:23:45

If you were trying to preserve a

1:23:47

rare species with a unique genetic

1:23:49

pool that was highly inbred,

1:23:52

like the iroil ones were, and then they

1:23:54

all went to extinction because they were two in bread, wouldn't

1:23:57

you want to have some gene flow from

1:23:59

the most similar population adjoining and bringing

1:24:01

new genes.

1:24:02

Because historically the.

1:24:05

Right but it was it.

1:24:07

But even though there was all connected

1:24:09

all the way to Mexico to Central Mexico, they

1:24:12

were still had unique genetic

1:24:14

markers because they have a different

1:24:16

habitat than the rest of the wolves. It's a different

1:24:18

habitat, so they're been isolated

1:24:21

on their own way. But that's my humble opinion.

1:24:23

I'm a lumper, not a splitter, and I think

1:24:25

it would behoove Mexican wolves

1:24:27

to have some new gene flow. And I am not in

1:24:30

a maybe a majority opinion, but I

1:24:32

think people who have genetics background would

1:24:35

agree it's

1:24:38

going to happen. They won't be able to stop.

1:24:39

It, well, sounds like they will maybe

1:24:42

try.

1:24:42

They will try, They're already trying. They

1:24:44

do move all these wolves back every time

1:24:46

they go out of the.

1:24:47

Rescoveries are they getting them?

1:24:49

They catch them everyone, everyone of them collared.

1:24:51

Just about so they have

1:24:53

no idea.

1:24:54

And also when a wolf is in an area,

1:24:56

you do.

1:24:57

A little baby and like you put the baby in the mill

1:24:59

of room the while it crawls away and you go get

1:25:01

it and set it back. And they thought about it.

1:25:05

Get an invisible.

1:25:06

Fence, right, I mean, that's how we deal with

1:25:08

dogs wondering.

1:25:09

I don't think that would work for them, but anyway,

1:25:12

And when wolves go to an area, they leave

1:25:14

scatt they kill things. People

1:25:16

see them. Everybody's got trail gameras everybody

1:25:18

and the brothers all looking for the biggest delcor water.

1:25:21

You see them, You see him, right, you

1:25:24

know they're there. They're not small and sneaky

1:25:26

like lions. They're just not. They instead

1:25:28

of sneaking around and hiding in a rock crevices,

1:25:30

they come into town in Harley's I mean wolves

1:25:33

animals.

1:25:36

That's a T shirt. That's a T shirt.

1:25:39

There's two I want to talk about, just to give

1:25:41

you a little taste of what's common. I want to

1:25:43

talk about mountain lions, Okay, difference mountains

1:25:45

and wolves. Yep, I

1:25:49

want to talk about why wolves don't kill people.

1:25:52

That's a good one, But

1:25:55

first I.

1:25:55

Want to talk a little bit more about Colorado. Okay,

1:25:58

crystal Ball for me, and you're totally excused,

1:26:01

like like this is just crystal Ball land. This

1:26:03

is if you had to make a guess. Yeah,

1:26:06

what is Give

1:26:09

me a timeframe. What's

1:26:11

going on in twenty years in Colorado? Just take a wild

1:26:14

stab. I'm gonna known. Diane

1:26:16

Boyd is taking a wild

1:26:18

stab. This is not an academic

1:26:21

exercise. She's taking a wild

1:26:23

stab. Twenty years

1:26:25

what's the wolf land? What's the landscape in Colorado?

1:26:28

What's going on?

1:26:29

People will still be fighting where their wolves should

1:26:32

be or should not be there, And despite our human

1:26:34

intentions, they will continue to expand their populations

1:26:37

and fill up appropriate habitat in Colorado,

1:26:39

and they will have to kill some for killing livestock,

1:26:42

and the other ones that aren't killing livestock

1:26:44

will continue to find habitat and reproduce.

1:26:46

And I think there'll be more wolves.

1:26:48

So it'll be Montana twenty years after

1:26:50

nineteen ninety six.

1:26:51

What about the hunting season? You see that happen eventually

1:26:54

hunting for wolves?

1:26:55

Yeah, I think that when you get enough

1:26:57

wolves to create social tolerance. Season

1:27:00

is a good idea. It's probably not

1:27:02

such a good idea for individual wolves,

1:27:04

but in terms of creating tolerance on the

1:27:07

landscape, and I think you have to give

1:27:09

the tools to livestock

1:27:11

producers that they can take

1:27:13

care problems themselves. I mean, that's what they did in Montana

1:27:15

early on. I just say follow the model that

1:27:17

worked in Montana. It's worked pretty

1:27:20

well. I mean we went from one wolf

1:27:22

to you know, thousand wolves pretty quickly.

1:27:24

And then in your crystal Ball can you extend

1:27:26

that crystal Ball scenario to the

1:27:30

Mexican gray wolf. They're all making

1:27:32

love and they're just mixed in together.

1:27:37

Should have hefelfinger here too?

1:27:38

So well, yeah, but this isn't what you

1:27:41

want to have. Yeah,

1:27:43

this is just your guess work.

1:27:44

People will still be fighting over Mexican

1:27:46

wolves, and Mexican wolves

1:27:49

may hit I'm just trying to think, they

1:27:52

may hit a critical mass where

1:27:54

they're not all colored, and then some of them will

1:27:56

escape beyond the the geo

1:27:58

fencing of their their loud

1:28:01

recovery zone and began going elsewhere.

1:28:03

But if they continue to heavily,

1:28:06

heavily handle and manage the wolves

1:28:08

and collar everyone that well,

1:28:10

they're not all collared, but manage its a

1:28:12

significant portion population. It's going to be really

1:28:15

hard for those wolves to sneak through, but that's

1:28:18

going to be And I just think the wolves from the north will

1:28:20

come down and start integrating. I'm

1:28:22

hoping they will. And

1:28:24

I think Mike Phillips would disagree with that too. But

1:28:26

the other people I know, biologists, we talk about this.

1:28:29

It's like, yeah, let them, let them blend,

1:28:31

Let's see what happens. It's sort of like this

1:28:33

this animal of the northeast, the Koi

1:28:36

wolf dog thing. Nobody

1:28:38

really knows what it is, but that animal

1:28:40

has made a really successful living. It's

1:28:42

found a niche that was partially

1:28:45

formed but what we tolerate and how we modified

1:28:47

the landscape, so this animal that lives there now

1:28:49

is doing really well well. Mexican

1:28:52

wolf gray wolf mix probably

1:28:55

be the same way. At least they'll have more genetic variation.

1:28:57

They probably won't go extinct due to inbreeding. Who

1:29:01

knows, but you asked my crystal ball. I

1:29:03

think there would be more wolves. I

1:29:05

think they will fill in more places and

1:29:07

there will always be the battles to

1:29:10

have them on the landscape always.

1:29:12

I feel like, you know how there's sports betting. I

1:29:15

think there should be a way that you could like that we could

1:29:17

run like a bookie thing and

1:29:19

have uh Colorado wolf

1:29:22

betting. H I

1:29:25

mean you got them.

1:29:26

You can bet on anything though, Yeah, I mean I

1:29:29

wouldn't be surprised if you could get odds on

1:29:32

Colorado's wolf population in ten years.

1:29:34

Yeah, and people could make like bets and

1:29:36

you could win money and lose money.

1:29:39

I think to the more the more radical

1:29:42

people get, I think

1:29:45

it will cause more people to feel

1:29:47

sort of moved towards the metal. Like this fellow

1:29:50

over in where was it Daniel Wyoming

1:29:52

who ran over the wolf with the snowmobile

1:29:54

this winter? You must have And he crippled

1:29:56

it so couldn't get away, and then he ties it up and

1:29:59

brings it into a b All of this is

1:30:01

illegal, which is a minor thing, but it's

1:30:03

really immoral. And he brings into a

1:30:05

bar and people are laughing with it and getting their pictures

1:30:07

taken in and finally hauls it out back and shoots it.

1:30:09

Well, that's just one animal, but it had huge

1:30:12

ripples throughout the country, and

1:30:14

that's affecting wolf policy because

1:30:16

of one guy's action. And I think those

1:30:18

people that maybe didn't really care

1:30:20

about wolves or maybe dislike them somewhat

1:30:23

moderately, see that is

1:30:25

that is not fair, Chase, that is

1:30:27

not acceptable to me as a hunter or a

1:30:30

human being, and we have to put

1:30:32

brakes on that. I kind of see the more radical

1:30:35

people get. I'm hoping that people

1:30:37

come to the middle more. That's my hope.

1:30:43

Why don't wolves kill people? Because

1:30:45

they do it Romania, I've wondered that for

1:30:48

a long time.

1:30:48

Well, sometimes come on, So it's

1:30:51

not more common there, No, But

1:30:54

there's all those like crazy old stories about.

1:30:57

That's not None of that's true.

1:30:58

So in my book, I

1:31:00

could read you a little paragraph about statistics,

1:31:02

but do you want me to find

1:31:04

it. I'll have to look for it for a moment when

1:31:07

you're talking. I'll look for it. But wolves

1:31:09

have occasionally killed people in modern

1:31:11

times. Documented Kenton Carnegie

1:31:14

was killed up in northern Saskatchewan and in

1:31:16

the eighties early nineties by

1:31:19

He was at a remote camp and these

1:31:21

wolves were coming into the dump. So think of think dump

1:31:23

bear not afraid of people. And

1:31:25

he went out one evening alone with

1:31:27

his camera and he was found

1:31:30

the next morning, I believe, and he had been killed

1:31:32

and partially consumed, and it appeared to be

1:31:34

wolves. There was wolves and bears both feeding

1:31:36

on him, but it looked like the wounds were wolf

1:31:39

probably, So that's one guy. And then

1:31:42

there was a woman jogger in Alaska who

1:31:44

was jogging and she was attacked members

1:31:46

killed. I don't think she was consumed.

1:31:49

I don't remember on that, but

1:31:51

it was definitely predation they killed her. And

1:31:54

there's been a few, I

1:31:57

guess attacks encounters of

1:31:59

wolves that have been habituated,

1:32:01

especially like on some of

1:32:03

the islands off of British

1:32:05

Columbia and Washington where people kayak

1:32:08

and they're feeding wolves out on the beaches and wolves

1:32:10

get friendly and they come in and bite somebody in their sleeping

1:32:12

bag. Because they don't stuff like that Algonquin

1:32:15

Park habituated

1:32:17

wolves that becomes a problem.

1:32:20

So those are the cases that I know of.

1:32:22

And then Mark mcnae wrote a really

1:32:24

long document published you could google

1:32:26

his name, Mark McNee of all

1:32:28

the wolf encounters that he could find that were verifiable

1:32:32

olden days. A lot

1:32:34

of wolves were rabid. I

1:32:36

mean a lot. I shouldn't say that. A lot

1:32:39

of the encounters with wolves that had

1:32:41

bitten were rabbid. Okay, that happens with every

1:32:43

species, bats, foxes, it doesn't matter.

1:32:45

But if you look at what other predators

1:32:48

attack humans, people

1:32:50

are killed every year by black

1:32:52

bears, grizzly bears, some deer,

1:32:55

some elk, mountain lions, coyotes.

1:32:58

That's not true with wolves. And so you

1:33:00

say, why don't why don't people

1:33:03

kill wolves more often? Oh? My, I'm

1:33:05

sorry, I'm sorry, right.

1:33:06

That's what I mean.

1:33:07

And there I think it's an interesting question because they could.

1:33:09

Oh absolutely. I look at any of us

1:33:11

in this room. If one of us was out in

1:33:13

the woods by ourselves and a pack of eight wolves

1:33:15

came along, we'd be toast.

1:33:18

Yeah, I could handle three, but

1:33:20

eight probably.

1:33:22

Domestic dogs kill all kinds of people,

1:33:24

Yes, but they could.

1:33:26

Right, So what what is

1:33:28

your hypothesis as to why

1:33:30

not?

1:33:32

My thought about that is, well, we, first

1:33:34

of all, when we domesticated dogs, we changed

1:33:37

the gene pool. They have the dogs

1:33:39

here, but he's on my foot right

1:33:41

now, Okay, I'll make sure doesn't

1:33:43

pull any cables. Over the course of time

1:33:46

we have When we started domesticating

1:33:48

livestock about eleven thousand years

1:33:51

ago, we changed our relationship

1:33:53

with wolves. Prior to that, it

1:33:56

wasn't much. There was no reason I have conflict.

1:33:58

As a matter of fact, I talk about

1:34:00

some archaeologists,

1:34:03

some ancient people study wolves, and anciently

1:34:06

they their theory was that

1:34:10

humans in primitive times would

1:34:13

watch wolves haunt successfully. So

1:34:15

wolves and humans live in the same family structure

1:34:18

group of animals that are related. Usually they

1:34:20

would watch them hunt and they end up

1:34:22

learning that if they could follow the wolves,

1:34:26

they could steal meet from them. So

1:34:28

they would watch the wolves, and

1:34:30

when wolves picked out something, then the wolves

1:34:32

humans really humans could go over there with their adladdles

1:34:35

or spears, drive the wolves away, take

1:34:37

the meat they wanted, and then leave, and then the wolves

1:34:39

clean up the scraps. This was their hypothesis,

1:34:42

so they actually it was no way

1:34:45

a synergetic or altruistic

1:34:47

relationship. It's brutes arrival, but

1:34:50

they sort of collaborated and out

1:34:52

of that, eventually we learned

1:34:54

that we could make dogs, I guess, but I

1:34:56

think over time, once

1:34:59

we started to desticate animals, especially

1:35:01

livestock, those wolves

1:35:03

that were aggressive towards people were

1:35:06

weeded out and killed. And I think that gene

1:35:08

pool has been so heavily selected

1:35:10

against. I think the behavior

1:35:12

is still there. That's the only thing I can think of, because

1:35:15

how many people have successfully domesticated

1:35:17

allions made a different animal out of it, or bears

1:35:19

or coiotes, right, these other things that kill

1:35:22

us people haven't

1:35:24

And we've spent so much time competing

1:35:27

with wolves of their livestock and killing them that I

1:35:29

just think that aggression

1:35:31

towards people is no longer

1:35:33

there. And maybe with the crystal ball,

1:35:36

maybe three hundred yards from now and we haven't

1:35:38

been killing wolves, maybe that'll change. I

1:35:40

don't know. I don't know, but

1:35:42

it is an interesting question.

1:35:44

I was gonna just wanted to weigh. In

1:35:46

episode four sixty six Dire

1:35:48

Wolves and Ancient Hunting Dogs, we touch

1:35:51

on some of what you just mentioned Kith Angela

1:35:53

Perry and what does she say that

1:35:56

same thing we talked about that?

1:35:57

Okay, I'm gonna have to look that one up. I didn't hear it.

1:36:00

Whe do they fall? Like maybe

1:36:02

this is a weird question, but where do they fall on the intelligent

1:36:05

scale scale compared to like a bear or

1:36:07

a mountain lion or like

1:36:09

like would that play a role and they're

1:36:11

like understanding of how to

1:36:13

interact with humans, like,

1:36:15

are they smarter than.

1:36:16

A bear or Ah, the bear researchers

1:36:18

would say hell no, right, but I

1:36:22

can tell you. I mean I've trapped a lot of animals in

1:36:24

my life, everything from weasels to grizzlies,

1:36:26

and the wolves are the hardest animal to

1:36:28

catch. Bears are not hard at all

1:36:30

because they don't need to be. They're the top thing

1:36:33

and they eat everything. Wolves have had to

1:36:35

learn to sneaker on strict nine baits

1:36:38

guns, and because

1:36:40

they're a social species, they have to communicate

1:36:42

well, they have to collaborate. They're

1:36:45

different. I mean, none of these other predators

1:36:47

that we've been talking about are social and living

1:36:49

groups. And I believe that gives

1:36:51

wolves a need

1:36:54

evolutionarily to be high

1:36:56

intelligence. They have

1:36:58

to work, I do they I mean you

1:37:00

can look at your dog, which is kind of a challenged

1:37:04

version of a wolf. I mean, they're not that

1:37:06

good at anything, and they're

1:37:10

incredibly bright. I'm trying to use the right political term

1:37:12

here, but

1:37:14

they're incredibly brilliant. I mean, if you look at

1:37:16

what you can train a Melania or a border Collie

1:37:18

to do, and the wolves are much smarter

1:37:20

than that. They just are so

1:37:23

that's my humble opinion. But again the Baar researchers

1:37:26

would argue that, and case you have to. I mean, we're

1:37:28

looking at a human lens

1:37:31

to value intelligence.

1:37:33

That's really interesting, man. That's to

1:37:35

say that a wolf is smarter

1:37:37

than your pet dog.

1:37:39

Oh yeah, they don't

1:37:41

have to be smart. We feed them, we house

1:37:43

them.

1:37:44

They don't need.

1:37:45

To be smart.

1:37:46

They don't have to kill an elk every couple of

1:37:48

days, right, and yeah,

1:37:50

it's.

1:37:51

Like a wolf with a restrict plate or something.

1:37:56

Our dog is not an exceptional dog.

1:38:00

It's totally fine that everybody lif loves it, but it's

1:38:02

not exceptional anyway, used

1:38:04

to for whatever reason, would like to chew on rose

1:38:06

bushes and chew on raspberry bushes. It like the

1:38:09

for whatever reason, the thorniness of it. And

1:38:12

I have one time just took

1:38:14

my kids out and we put

1:38:17

a bunch of cayenne in the dirt

1:38:19

around a rose bush and

1:38:21

she went up to it and got a nose full of

1:38:23

that. Right, has never ever

1:38:26

gone.

1:38:27

Near same thing with you

1:38:29

know e callers and training and no dogs

1:38:31

are.

1:38:31

Sorry when you think about how getting hard to catch

1:38:35

the dog's like, dude, you

1:38:37

know, to make that connection, right, So

1:38:40

you think it's something being hard to trap, like

1:38:42

you sting its toe one time, and there's just something

1:38:44

about that situation.

1:38:46

Yeah, I mean the old timers

1:38:48

when they're read the books, the Last of the Loaners

1:38:50

and the last renegade wolves and guys

1:38:52

trying to catch them, the stuff they did to try

1:38:54

not smart these wolves. Sometimes. Well,

1:38:57

one of the worst things I read was they've been trapping

1:38:59

this this, this couple of wolves,

1:39:01

the last ones in the Southwest, and they

1:39:03

just couldn't catch the male, and

1:39:05

so they ended up catching the female

1:39:07

and then they took her and used her for bait, and the wolf

1:39:09

went in the next day. That was it. He was done

1:39:12

and they spent. Yeah, kind

1:39:14

of sad.

1:39:16

And Cormick McCarthy's the Crossing. He's

1:39:18

trying to catch a Mexican gray wolf, which

1:39:21

he then brings back across the border, but he winds

1:39:23

up he can't catch it, and

1:39:26

eventually makes a set in his fire

1:39:28

pit because

1:39:31

he would see that a wolf now and then come and sniff

1:39:33

around. So instead of making sets normal

1:39:35

sets, he made a set in his

1:39:37

fire, let this fire burn down,

1:39:39

cool off, and then made a set in there. I

1:39:41

think that's how he catches it. That's how he

1:39:43

gets it, gets it, I don't know. Then

1:39:47

he brings it back to Mexico because he can't bring himself

1:39:49

to kill it, Like he's supposed to catch it and kill it,

1:39:51

but can't. He brings it back to Mexican and it quickly

1:39:53

dies. Anyways, that's how

1:39:55

Corny McCarthy

1:39:58

soone kills it. Anyways.

1:40:00

Wow, that's a cheerful story. Well,

1:40:03

I mean, when it comes to wolves,

1:40:04

there's no good ends

1:40:07

for any large carnivore in the wild,

1:40:09

you know. I mean, they don't end isn't good

1:40:11

for them, no matter what it is. But they try and

1:40:13

live a really full life, and most importantly they dry and

1:40:15

leave their jeans behind. If they can

1:40:18

do that, they've succeeded.

1:40:19

But you're saying they don't move to a golf course. Watch

1:40:21

a lot of network telling there.

1:40:23

Was Okay, this is not in my book,

1:40:25

but we my last couple of years of working, we

1:40:27

got a call from somebody living in a

1:40:29

gated community between Whitefish and Callous

1:40:32

Spell and called up said we've

1:40:34

got some wolf pups in our driveway. And it's like,

1:40:36

oh, okay, great, thanks, I'm thinking

1:40:39

it's got to be skyotes. Yeah,

1:40:41

they're living in this gated community in an urban

1:40:43

area. So anyway, I said, I said,

1:40:45

we took some videos. I said, great,

1:40:47

can you send me the video? So they email me the video.

1:40:50

It's like, oh my god, those are wolf pups,

1:40:52

no kidding, in their driveway next to

1:40:54

their mailbox and they're playing in the culvert

1:40:56

that goes under their driveway. It's like wow.

1:40:59

So we go out there and talk to other neighbors

1:41:01

and several people had seen them. And

1:41:03

so this is a gated community with people

1:41:06

with huge houses. They're

1:41:08

all realthy. They love wildlife.

1:41:10

That's where they live there. There's huge amounts of green

1:41:12

space in the community. There's white tails

1:41:14

everywhere because no hunting is allowed. Talk

1:41:17

about Nirvana for wolves. They're

1:41:19

protected, they got endless food resources.

1:41:22

No one's going to hurt them. So we

1:41:24

tried to catch the adults through

1:41:26

a male and female. Had

1:41:29

no luck.

1:41:29

These are what reasons did you want to catch put a collar on it?

1:41:31

Oh, I want to know what happened at the end of the

1:41:33

summer. Okay, So what happens what's

1:41:35

going to happen when they leave this? You know, ten square

1:41:38

mile gated community. We couldn't

1:41:40

catch them. They were so smart about

1:41:42

people. We had them on trail cameras, couldn't

1:41:45

get them to step on the magic pan

1:41:47

the size you know of an oreo cookie. Literally.

1:41:50

And then after summer came and

1:41:52

the wolves went on and they left and they have

1:41:54

to disperse the bigger happy hunting grounds

1:41:57

square miles on average for a pack they

1:42:01

just won by one got shot gone,

1:42:04

So but they can't live in ten square

1:42:06

miles. They have to move on. But

1:42:08

it was so interesting to me that those wolves

1:42:10

set up in that community. Yeah,

1:42:13

so, I mean they will try to live.

1:42:14

That wasn't by accident.

1:42:16

I don't know how smart is a wolf.

1:42:18

I don't know, yeah, smarter than Can

1:42:21

you contextualize that a little bit more

1:42:23

about how there's no good ending for a

1:42:25

wolf because I think we all in this room understand

1:42:27

what that means when you say that, but I

1:42:30

think that a lot of people out there are When

1:42:32

you say that, it almost sounds

1:42:34

like you're saying, oh, they're all going to end up getting shot. But

1:42:36

that's not what you're saying.

1:42:37

No, I mean, a wolf is an

1:42:39

apex predator, top predator. It's

1:42:42

always hunting to hunt. It's

1:42:44

always having to compete for food, so they get

1:42:47

In Yellowstone Park, the largest cause immortality

1:42:49

is wolves killing other wolves protecting

1:42:52

their territory. They trespass and they get

1:42:54

killed outside of the park,

1:42:57

even when I was doing my work when they were still

1:42:59

protected. Eighty five percent of mortality

1:43:02

is caused by humans. They

1:43:05

don't live very long. Take a guess and how

1:43:07

long. So if we put together the data from Yellowstone

1:43:10

Park in Minnesota and Montana, take a guess

1:43:12

in the average longevity

1:43:14

of a wolf from the time they're detected,

1:43:16

because some die in the den young, so by the time

1:43:19

they're four or five weeks old in their scene until

1:43:21

they die, take a guess annual mortality.

1:43:24

Take an average average age at which they

1:43:27

die.

1:43:28

Four eighteen months.

1:43:29

I'm going to go six months,

1:43:32

four point.

1:43:33

Three, four point three.

1:43:35

Did you read that? No? I didn't.

1:43:36

You're right on the money four point three.

1:43:38

I was gonna go with four point six, but then I hedged my bets

1:43:40

and you thought you were going to surprise us.

1:43:42

Randall for the four he

1:43:44

gets the trip four point three years.

1:43:47

Oh, it's years years.

1:43:49

So they most of them don't live

1:43:52

long enough to reproduce what is the like

1:43:54

to randal ding ding ding.

1:43:57

A doctrine he does, and are

1:44:00

you out? Like so do I?

1:44:03

Not including Yellowstone perhaps,

1:44:06

but like, what is the survival rate

1:44:08

of say a litter of six pups, how many

1:44:10

of them will reach sexual maturity?

1:44:14

Is that a pretty high survival rate if.

1:44:16

They make it to the till like

1:44:18

the second year, they do pretty well. The first

1:44:21

year when they go between a year and

1:44:23

two years, when they're starting to dispersal and they're

1:44:25

starting to look around them, the pups

1:44:27

themselves, like they pups

1:44:29

generally make it. Generally when the

1:44:31

time they're little till their first year, they do really

1:44:33

well because they're all protected, their fed until

1:44:36

they get trapped or shot during hunting seasons

1:44:38

or or if they get Sometimes

1:44:41

humans have introduced parbo virus in distemper

1:44:44

in an environment, and if that gets into the

1:44:46

litter, mortality is very high.

1:44:48

Do they ever do that thing that

1:44:51

bears sometimes do where a male

1:44:53

come in and kill No, they don't do

1:44:55

that.

1:44:55

Nope. Yeah, I was gonna ask other than humans,

1:44:58

what's killing wolves?

1:45:00

Deer elk avalanches? The

1:45:03

first wolves? The wolves kill each

1:45:05

other? Yeah, I just said that in Yellowstone,

1:45:07

So like the first mortality, Recorded

1:45:10

Mortality and Yellowstone Park I

1:45:12

was told was a

1:45:15

UPS driver killing a wolf when he ran it

1:45:17

over. I thought, could you imagine being

1:45:19

that ups? Turf's like, oh my god, I just

1:45:21

killed the national icon about

1:45:24

it.

1:45:25

I hope is hiring.

1:45:28

So yeah, and they

1:45:30

get killed by lions, they

1:45:33

starve. I did have

1:45:35

one wolf dining an avalanche.

1:45:37

What about bears? The bears get after him.

1:45:40

They can if it's one on one, but when you

1:45:42

had a whole wolf pack. Yeah, wolves kill,

1:45:44

wolves kill black bears. Wolves

1:45:46

will kill a grizzly cub if they can, but usually

1:45:49

they can't. But one on one, I think,

1:45:51

Well, wolves are pretty fast.

1:45:53

Do they go way out of their way to kill coyotes in

1:45:56

places?

1:45:57

They do? Yeah? In Yellowstone Park

1:45:59

they filled them digging up coyote dens and killing

1:46:01

the pups. Pretty gruesome.

1:46:04

Do they got it in for Red Fox too?

1:46:06

No? So there's this

1:46:08

yeah in the book, so trophic

1:46:11

cascades we're going to get in a little bit. And I

1:46:13

just want you to know that before I wrote this book,

1:46:15

or while I was writing this book, I

1:46:18

ended up working with Jim Hafflefinger,

1:46:20

Dave oz Been. I mean, it was

1:46:23

really a hell of a good team. I was asked to be

1:46:25

the senior author for the latest. We

1:46:27

did an update on everything known

1:46:29

about wolves in North America. We

1:46:31

ended up being forty

1:46:34

thousand words long and an eight hundred

1:46:36

reference bibliography. It was

1:46:38

a scientific work. It was grueling,

1:46:41

it was interesting, difficult.

1:46:44

This was my anecdote for writing that this

1:46:47

book, so because

1:46:50

this was more

1:46:52

fun and personal. But the science is

1:46:54

in that book. It's a

1:46:56

major chapter. You can get it online. But

1:46:59

I learned a lot. We had Dean Cloth

1:47:01

from Canada. We had Joey yet And who

1:47:03

does the Red wolves. We had Brent Patterson

1:47:05

who does the Algonquin wolves.

1:47:07

We had Adrian Wineban who does the Midwestern

1:47:09

wolves. People from every social

1:47:12

I mean every segment of the population. I

1:47:15

learned a lot. So in terms of getting

1:47:17

back, we all wonder why don't

1:47:20

wolves kill people more often? But

1:47:23

what was the question? I'm sorry, I'm rambling. Foxes.

1:47:26

Yeah, so Tofa Cascades.

1:47:28

So they documented Yellowstone like ooh, this

1:47:30

is big earthshaking information that coyotes

1:47:33

had kind of taken over the cana

1:47:35

and niche in Yellowstone and kept the foxes

1:47:38

population subdued, and then wolves

1:47:40

came back and killed lots of

1:47:42

coyotes, and then the fox population

1:47:44

responded by increasing because wolves

1:47:46

don't really care about fox they're not really a competitor,

1:47:49

and foxes benefit from wolves they clean up

1:47:51

kills. We documented

1:47:53

that earlier in the North Fork years, because

1:47:56

when I arrived in the North Fork there

1:47:58

was we never saw fox anywhere

1:48:00

up there. The first fifteen years we had people out

1:48:02

all winter tracking on the snow.

1:48:05

We never saw a fox track. I never caught

1:48:07

a fox in a trap. And then when

1:48:09

the wolves started building up populations,

1:48:11

I was collaring and studying coyotes

1:48:13

at the same time, and the coyote

1:48:16

population. As the wolves went up, the coyotes

1:48:18

went down, and then we started seeing fox.

1:48:21

I got fox standing on my property. Now fox

1:48:23

are everywhere, Wolves are everywhere, Coyotes

1:48:26

not so much so.

1:48:27

He's a wolf sees that kyote and he just recognizes

1:48:30

it as a competitor.

1:48:31

You think something to get rid of, and.

1:48:33

He sees a fox and he just doesn't get too worked out.

1:48:35

It's kind of a nuisance.

1:48:37

It's a difference.

1:48:37

That's funny because I've I feel like I've heard

1:48:40

people make that observation just

1:48:42

in different parts of the West, like

1:48:44

in Idaho specifically, people

1:48:46

say, the coyotes have really

1:48:49

dropped in numbers and we're seeing foxes now and

1:48:51

we never really saw him before.

1:48:52

Right, Yeah, that's that's interesting too,

1:48:54

because in Michigan where

1:48:56

I grew up, it was always fox like,

1:48:59

you know, trappers targeted red fox. That's

1:49:02

just when coyotes came in in the early nineties

1:49:04

when they really exploded in that area. I mean,

1:49:06

the fox vanished.

1:49:08

Man, do you need more wolves?

1:49:10

What's sounds

1:49:13

like.

1:49:15

A mutual friend of ours likes

1:49:17

to use that as an analogy to humans,

1:49:20

where he's like a wolf

1:49:23

likes to go around the landscape and go that

1:49:25

ain't good for me and mine getting rid

1:49:27

of it. And we're

1:49:30

on a landscape going, oh

1:49:32

no, let's bring in more wolves. We might

1:49:34

have less elk or less this

1:49:36

or that, but let's keep

1:49:38

them around. And he's saying, like, why are

1:49:40

we the only sort of apex predator

1:49:42

that would tolerate or even think of

1:49:44

having competition as

1:49:47

like a good thing, instead of saying, let's just

1:49:49

get rid of all of them like a wolf

1:49:51

might do, so that there's it's

1:49:53

better for it for it's its species.

1:49:56

You know, that's a good point, like like wolf a

1:50:00

it's wolf lovers love all

1:50:02

these things about wolves, but they don't like to

1:50:04

see it in people.

1:50:06

M M.

1:50:08

You know, if you're like man, that could be a lot of competition.

1:50:11

I don't want that here, just thinking

1:50:14

like a.

1:50:14

Wearable I

1:50:17

have a question for you. So when

1:50:19

Krinn called me, she said,

1:50:21

you have experienced increased

1:50:27

enthusiasmic excitement, hatred, whatever wolf

1:50:29

issue has been building still,

1:50:31

like we see it all the time in Montana.

1:50:33

I've seen this.

1:50:34

Well, well we talk about this, we talk about

1:50:37

right now and then on the podcast and then yeah,

1:50:39

people right, I mean the feelings.

1:50:41

Are feelings are running higher about

1:50:43

wolves now than they were twenty years old.

1:50:44

Well, no, no, no, I would say that. I

1:50:47

would say that feelings, whatever

1:50:50

high running feelings there are are

1:50:53

high running only because

1:50:56

of what's going on in Colorado.

1:50:58

And then that reignited the entire

1:51:00

debate. But I would not say

1:51:02

generally, well, okay, there's

1:51:05

a there's another hot area. Another

1:51:07

hot area is in

1:51:11

Minnesota, Wisconsin,

1:51:13

my home state of Michigan. I just came from and got

1:51:15

a lot of earfolds about this. Hunters

1:51:19

are really disappointed in

1:51:21

the collapse of deer numbers

1:51:24

and then not and then the states

1:51:27

not having any authority to come

1:51:29

in and do any kind of wolf control. And

1:51:31

there's a little bit of a question of like how bad does

1:51:33

it have to get and do we really need

1:51:35

to like trade our deer hunting for wolves,

1:51:38

and we can't seek a compromise and more

1:51:40

of a balance them being like I

1:51:43

don't want to be apologetic about liking the deer

1:51:46

hunt. I want to be able to deer hunt and have success.

1:51:48

So what are what are this? I mean,

1:51:51

Wisconsin had a huge wolf season

1:51:53

and they really kill a lot of wolves, And what

1:51:56

is the wolf season in Michigan?

1:51:57

And well there's none because they got put back on the.

1:52:00

Sea to protect them.

1:52:01

Yeah, so an their back.

1:52:02

They've closed it. They've had it, they've closed

1:52:04

it.

1:52:05

So we've had this discussion about should should

1:52:08

wolves be listed or not? Right

1:52:11

everywhere where they've come back, all of

1:52:13

them in Western states, Midwestern

1:52:16

states, some of the western

1:52:18

states, they have exceeded

1:52:21

way beyond expectations of delisting

1:52:24

criteria. Yes, four years on end.

1:52:28

So what is the value of the Endangered Species

1:52:31

Act if you don't follow the

1:52:33

rules of the criteria.

1:52:34

And I'm not saying I can tell you what it is. It's

1:52:36

not anymore. It is my

1:52:39

favorite animal protection Act.

1:52:42

It's very valuable to the people who that's

1:52:44

how, you know, create

1:52:46

lawsuits.

1:52:47

They don't want to talk about the numbers. They don't care

1:52:49

about the numbers.

1:52:49

I've had lots of people ask me when I

1:52:52

do public texts, do you feel wolf should be

1:52:54

relisted? And I say relisted like

1:52:57

in Montana? Do you feel wolf should be realisted? They're

1:52:59

delisted in Montana? Yeah, And

1:53:01

I say then I say,

1:53:03

okay, geographically which area Montana? And

1:53:05

I say, well, you know, I

1:53:07

don't like to see dead, bleeding wolves hanging off

1:53:09

of tailgates, but they have exceeded

1:53:12

recovery standards. There are approximately

1:53:14

a quarter million of wolves worldwide.

1:53:17

There are how many whooping cranes, how many

1:53:19

blackfooted ferrets? And I

1:53:21

can't say biologically that

1:53:23

we have any reason to have Montana

1:53:26

wolves or Midwestern wolves on the

1:53:28

endangered species lifts where they're connected to

1:53:30

Canadian populations that go into tens

1:53:32

of thousands. On the

1:53:34

other hand, do I like what

1:53:36

I see going on with the management of wolves

1:53:39

in Montana in particular, and the very strong

1:53:41

anti wolve sentiments. No, But

1:53:44

does it mean that they should go

1:53:46

back on the list. No, so

1:53:50

can people through increased

1:53:52

harvest intentsive harvest knock

1:53:55

wolves down to from the spout

1:53:57

a thousand now or nine hundred two one

1:54:00

hundred and fifty, which is the trigger point

1:54:02

at which the ESA says, ooh,

1:54:04

you've now endangered this population and we're going to put

1:54:06

them back on the endangered species list.

1:54:09

It would be really difficult because right now people

1:54:11

can hunt trap night

1:54:13

shoot predator called dig dens.

1:54:16

I mean, you can do almost anything with wolves

1:54:18

for half the year.

1:54:19

We've talked about this before, like in the case

1:54:21

of Montana or Wyoming

1:54:24

or Idaho, like it

1:54:26

would never be in the state's best interest

1:54:28

to knock them back to that point

1:54:30

because then the FEDS would come back in and

1:54:33

exactly.

1:54:33

But what I'm saying is people are the

1:54:36

pro wolf public. I sit

1:54:38

in the middle, but I'm obviously passionate

1:54:41

about wolves. So the pro

1:54:43

wolf public thinks that by increasing

1:54:45

all of these parameters to allow

1:54:48

more take I don't like the word

1:54:50

harvests more kill, that we're

1:54:52

going to put them down one hundred and fifty. I

1:54:55

think you can't do that without poison.

1:54:58

Because you're right that's the point you're is

1:55:00

it. Even as liberal as it is here for six

1:55:02

months out of the year, we're still not able to

1:55:04

knock them back that much.

1:55:06

Right, We've caught them back some, and I mean,

1:55:09

like this guy in Daniel's Montaneo,

1:55:11

Dianuel Wyoming, it

1:55:14

just is disgusting. I just you shouldn't do that with

1:55:16

an elk, with a bear. With a wolf, should just behave

1:55:18

like that with a wild animal. But with

1:55:21

the liberal seasons we've got, and this year

1:55:23

they did increase, their harvest is up to I think two

1:55:25

hundred and eighty six for the last license year,

1:55:27

which is a little more than the year before.

1:55:30

But we've had years where there's been three hundred.

1:55:33

The population isn't changing a

1:55:35

lot. But on

1:55:37

the other hand, using the method

1:55:40

they used to estimate wolf populations

1:55:42

through palm, I

1:55:44

think patch

1:55:47

occupancy model, it's an integrated

1:55:50

patchcy model. Occupancy

1:55:52

models are designed to

1:55:55

estimate occupancy where they are. They're

1:55:57

not designed to estimate abundance or

1:55:59

numbers, so they're using a model

1:56:03

for not what is designed to do. So I don't

1:56:05

know that it's a real good representative. What I would

1:56:07

say is I'm sorry, no go ahead. There's

1:56:09

other factors to look at, like go

1:56:12

to the Livestock Loss Board website.

1:56:14

It's public information for

1:56:16

Montana or any agency or the USDA,

1:56:18

you know, Wildlife services, and you can look at

1:56:21

the number of livestock losses

1:56:23

by predator. They list them by predator

1:56:26

or by death cause, and you will see,

1:56:28

especially in Montana, the number of

1:56:31

livestock depredations in Montana

1:56:34

is getting was less in twenty twenty

1:56:36

three than it was for the previous

1:56:38

years. The number of complaints was

1:56:41

less, the number of wolves taken for killing

1:56:43

livestock was less. If

1:56:45

there are wolves on the landscape Montana

1:56:48

and there's livestock, they

1:56:50

will kill them occasionally. So I would say

1:56:52

these other indices should be incorporated

1:56:55

into the model because I

1:56:57

think when you see less and less and less depredation,

1:57:00

it's because there's less wolves. Even

1:57:02

though people are killed more this year,

1:57:04

and if you look at the percentage statistically,

1:57:07

it's probably not real significant. But maybe

1:57:10

more people were out hunting last year to hind kill

1:57:12

wolves because it was a milder winter. We don't know,

1:57:14

We can't.

1:57:14

Did you say it was to eighty six that

1:57:17

were killed or it was two eighty six was the quota.

1:57:19

No, that was what was killed between shooting

1:57:22

and trapping. Yeah, I think that's the

1:57:24

current number. You can look it up and

1:57:26

it just that was just released. But there's

1:57:29

many things to look at. But what I can say is

1:57:31

there's there's adequate wolves, and

1:57:34

I'd say there's adequate prey.

1:57:36

And I was looking, did you see that chidge

1:57:39

who Just in Fergus County near Lewistown,

1:57:42

several several

1:57:45

large landowners got together and wanted

1:57:47

the state to kill fifty

1:57:50

thousand elk because

1:57:53

the elk are taking over the private

1:57:56

large landowner's habitat

1:57:59

and they don't allow people to come in and shoot

1:58:02

them. So they're all these elk and they wanted to

1:58:04

have this power to kill fifty thousand

1:58:06

elk extra outside of normal

1:58:09

hunting season.

1:58:09

Fifty thousand five.

1:58:11

That was that United Property Owners

1:58:14

thing.

1:58:14

Right back, BHA YAH

1:58:16

and BHA.

1:58:17

And Montana Sportsman's Alliance and all these

1:58:19

hunting groups said no, you

1:58:22

have to create access. And I think

1:58:25

if people are really concerned about elk numbers,

1:58:27

because if you look at the tables the statistics,

1:58:30

there are more elk in Montana now then there's been

1:58:32

in a long time. And in Wyoming they're issuing

1:58:34

unlimited number of elk takes in twenty twenty

1:58:36

three, I believe, or twenty twenty four. It

1:58:39

seems from my perspective, you would

1:58:41

know more you guys deal with your hunting company.

1:58:43

It seems to be more of an access issue

1:58:46

than it does a predator issue. And if

1:58:48

I were a hunting big

1:58:50

part of a hunting conservation promotion group,

1:58:53

I would be working on the access issue

1:58:56

more and working with our legislators

1:58:58

more and our governors more. Know you

1:59:00

know what these rich

1:59:03

out of state guys or whoever own these ranches said,

1:59:05

they're not letting us on. I would I would be

1:59:07

really concerned about it. What do you guys feel about

1:59:09

that?

1:59:10

I mean, I think that's the in some areas

1:59:12

that's the biggest conversation around elk numbers

1:59:14

is you have just

1:59:20

you have elk that are learning over

1:59:23

time. Elk are learning safe zones.

1:59:26

There are big acreages where hunting's not

1:59:28

allowed, and there are big acreages

1:59:30

where people have

1:59:33

an objective of getting a couple

1:59:36

of big bulls and

1:59:38

they don't want something to mess up those big

1:59:40

bulls. They don't want people to push them

1:59:42

off. They kind of like them

1:59:44

during hunting season. They don't like them when they're

1:59:46

doing crop damage, and they're

1:59:48

reluctant to have Joe

1:59:50

Blow running

1:59:53

around on their place. And

1:59:56

they kind of want the best of both worlds. They

1:59:58

want they want individual access,

2:00:01

then they want state help. And what

2:00:03

they don't want is a sign

2:00:06

saying come one call

2:00:08

right.

2:00:09

They need more wolves.

2:00:10

Just kidding, I'm just kidding on

2:00:12

that.

2:00:14

But you see the problem

2:00:16

again, it's always humans. But

2:00:19

if you look at the species

2:00:22

keep responsible for killing sheep and cattle,

2:00:24

it's number one. Grizzly bears kill almost

2:00:27

three times as many livestock animals

2:00:29

as both lions and wolves, and

2:00:32

lions generally kill a few

2:00:34

more than wolves, but it's hard to confirm totally.

2:00:36

Because lions kill more

2:00:38

livestock than wolves.

2:00:39

The confirmed kills. The hard thing is when a

2:00:41

wolf kills a cattle or a calf

2:00:44

or whatever, there's six or eight them feeding on

2:00:46

it, so there's often not enough evidence less

2:00:48

to determine which predator responsible.

2:00:50

So there's a lot more probables

2:00:53

for wolves than there are lions, but confirmed

2:00:55

it's more lions and wolves.

2:00:58

Where you got wolves and mountain lion overlapping,

2:01:00

what's killing most.

2:01:01

Of the game lions. Do

2:01:04

you look at the Bitter at Elk study. Yeah,

2:01:06

so it's surprising to me. So there's been

2:01:08

three studies that Fish, Wildlife and Parks

2:01:10

has done. And this is an agency that's not

2:01:13

real pro wolf, right, let's just say

2:01:15

so, they do these studies. And when I was looking

2:01:18

at the research study

2:01:20

plan and the results, I was shocked because

2:01:22

I thought wolves would be the primary

2:01:24

predator. But you can go on the FWP website

2:01:27

google the data. They did three studies

2:01:29

that were long term, multi region studies,

2:01:32

one for moose, one for mule deer,

2:01:34

and one for elk. And they looked at the populations

2:01:37

of this the game animals three different

2:01:39

areas over multiple years, and they put

2:01:41

a lot of callers out and they looked at mortality.

2:01:44

So and the bitter at Elk study, probably

2:01:47

all familiar lions killed more. And

2:01:49

when they increased the harvest on black bears

2:01:51

and wolves lions still.

2:01:54

That had no effect.

2:01:56

And the more they were just lions killing everything.

2:01:58

They thought the same thing in Idaho. Wives your way

2:02:00

out.

2:02:00

Killing wolves, yes, and when So when they

2:02:03

did the moose study, what do you think the number

2:02:05

one killer of moose was it

2:02:07

was grompy.

2:02:07

What you think lions?

2:02:09

No, black, No, it

2:02:12

was tis.

2:02:14

It was climate and habitat exactly

2:02:17

they killed like it was fifty six

2:02:19

percent of the most mortalities documented.

2:02:21

The rerelated to climate.

2:02:23

That would be ticks, uh, mostly

2:02:25

probably ticks and things related.

2:02:27

Predation was a very small section of

2:02:29

the pie, and I was surprised of

2:02:32

the predation section. So you beans

2:02:34

killed almost the same percentage almost

2:02:36

as the predators a little less of

2:02:38

the predation section. It was wolves

2:02:40

first, I think bear a second,

2:02:43

lions there, but wolves was slightly more. But

2:02:45

yeah, the environment changing.

2:02:47

The habitat Milder's got way lions

2:02:50

was lions.

2:02:51

So why do people want to keep increasing.

2:02:53

Wolf because the lions were because the lions

2:02:55

were always here. That was kind of the thing

2:02:57

that we talked about with Idaho. Is you had

2:03:00

you had? I don't. I'm gonna butcher not. These are not

2:03:02

the right numbers, but it paints a somewhat

2:03:05

accurate portrait. It'd be like prior

2:03:08

to wolves coming into the Idaho

2:03:10

Panhandle. I don't. Again,

2:03:12

this is not the exact number, but it's not crazy.

2:03:14

It'd be that lines are killing

2:03:17

thirty out of one hundred elk

2:03:19

calves. Let's say, yeah, okay, something

2:03:22

like that. But that had

2:03:24

always been true, and everything

2:03:26

about elk abundance and everything about what

2:03:29

like what statically normal, right,

2:03:31

just normal life that was going on,

2:03:34

and then something comes in and it adds ten.

2:03:38

Okay, So now forty

2:03:40

out of one hundred elk calves are

2:03:42

dying from predation because

2:03:45

there's this new additive thing,

2:03:47

and socially and otherwise with the population,

2:03:50

it winds up being that ten percent

2:03:53

tips of balance that we'd become used to. And

2:03:56

so you know, people had seen it's always

2:03:58

been normal, yeah, and then now it's not normal

2:04:01

no more. What happened different? This

2:04:03

new thing that the baseline had always

2:04:06

burned? Right, You'd always lost those

2:04:08

thirty yepp and you had an

2:04:10

elk population that reflected that level

2:04:12

of predation, and all of a sudden, now you have an elk population

2:04:15

that doesn't reflect that. It reflects something new, and

2:04:17

it's going to be lower.

2:04:18

So you're saying, all the wolf coming

2:04:20

back is the additive, none of its compensatory

2:04:23

mortality.

2:04:24

Man, I know the terms you're using,

2:04:26

but I can't answer that.

2:04:28

So you're not seeing lion

2:04:30

populations diminishing down to

2:04:33

twenty percent of the elk caves say instead

2:04:35

that the oh that

2:04:37

the wolves are now taking ten percent

2:04:39

that the lions would.

2:04:40

Take it must have been additive, because

2:04:42

how else can you explain the map. I

2:04:44

mean, like, this is the thing that that people

2:04:46

have to accept, Like the really pro

2:04:49

wolf people have to accept that this is

2:04:51

true. And when they're when they're kind of being honest,

2:04:53

they acknowledge it. Meaning

2:04:56

on one hand, they like think hunters blow

2:04:59

it out, everything out of proportion, and hunters are like,

2:05:01

oh, we're gonna lose all of our dear and l right, and

2:05:04

they criticize hunters for that. At the same

2:05:06

time, they'll say, oh, if CWD

2:05:09

is from having two dens of populations,

2:05:12

wolves will help. And you're like, well, I

2:05:14

thought that you're saying that hunters are wrong and

2:05:16

that wolves don't lower game numbers. Now you're

2:05:18

saying they do. Or they'll say

2:05:21

deer and elk are over browsing,

2:05:24

right, wolves will help.

2:05:26

It's like, homet let's back up, because earlier you

2:05:28

told me it doesn't matter the ways,

2:05:30

that doesn't matter for deering out numbers, so it does

2:05:32

matter for deering out numbers. Right. It's like you

2:05:35

can't argue, and you know this better

2:05:37

than me, but you can't argue. Like in

2:05:40

the Greater Yellstone ecosystem, when wolves

2:05:42

came in in the mid nineties, there's

2:05:45

no other word for it. Elk numbers collapsed.

2:05:47

They collapsed.

2:05:48

But and the.

2:05:48

Panhandle Idaho elk numbers just like there's

2:05:50

no other word for what happened. They collapsed.

2:05:53

But do you know about the winters that the wolves

2:05:55

came into. Idoh is the heaviest winters ever recorded.

2:05:58

The wolves came into Yells and

2:06:00

twenty thousand elk on the northern range

2:06:03

of Lamar is not a normal range

2:06:05

of numbers of animals that should

2:06:07

be there anyway.

2:06:08

Okay, I mean you know all that.

2:06:10

I think we talked about this last time. But the

2:06:12

winters of ninety six ninety seven, that

2:06:14

was the second winter they put in. I thought

2:06:16

that you can sit there, maybe

2:06:18

you can, but tell me that thirty wolves

2:06:20

are going to kill ten thousand outs.

2:06:22

No, it wasn't. I don't think that it was. I

2:06:24

think that it was very long term. Yeah it

2:06:26

was. It wasn't that year. It wasn't like the ones they

2:06:28

brought in. Yeah, yeah, I mean, but correct

2:06:30

me if I'm wrong. Like you know it better than me. But

2:06:33

is it not fair? Is it

2:06:35

not fair to say that, let's talk about the Idaho Panhandle.

2:06:38

I don't know about the idol Pana. I can talk about the

2:06:40

lamar pretty.

2:06:40

Good, Okay. Wherever the lamar.

2:06:43

Yeah, Yellowstone, Northern

2:06:45

Herd.

2:06:46

Okay, bad

2:06:49

winners or not? I mean, come

2:06:51

on, that had unless

2:06:54

I'm wrong, that had the

2:06:56

incoming wolves and the expansion of wolf populations.

2:06:58

Elk had a big change on

2:07:00

elk because that's also if we remember,

2:07:03

we're all supposed to celebrate them for bringing

2:07:05

the beavers back, which has now been

2:07:07

walked back and not true. So

2:07:09

it did something to elk, right.

2:07:12

Yeah, and you could pull up the table. But the elk, the alk

2:07:14

numbers fell off really fast in that hard

2:07:16

winter. And like in Montana in

2:07:19

ninety six ninety seven, Carolyn sim

2:07:21

was doing white tail deer study in northwest Montana

2:07:24

and forty percent of the white tail

2:07:26

died win or die off and had nothing

2:07:28

to do without Okay. So I'm just saying with

2:07:30

wolves.

2:07:32

It couldn't like And in the case of the

2:07:34

bitter, the way someone described it to me,

2:07:36

I can't remember who was Like the

2:07:39

elk, there could sustain like some

2:07:41

certain level of predation

2:07:44

and maintain a certain r

2:07:46

number. But when you put

2:07:49

it the wolf on top of it, that was

2:07:51

like just enough to be a tipping

2:07:53

point to push.

2:07:54

Them over the edge or push them on a private

2:07:56

land where people don't allow them. You're hunted. That's

2:07:58

what's happening in.

2:07:59

The bitter But like in the case of like

2:08:01

a bad winner, you stack wolves

2:08:03

on top of that, maybe the elk, yeah

2:08:07

could have you know what I mean, Like it's just

2:08:09

one more thing they've got to deal

2:08:11

with.

2:08:11

So I mean, I just read the scientific literature

2:08:13

and I'm a hunter too, But in

2:08:16

Yellowstone there are so many factories.

2:08:18

It's really I would say it's unfair

2:08:21

to say one is to blame. It's a huge

2:08:23

puzzle with many factors. And since the wolves

2:08:25

come back, the olk numbers have definitely decreased.

2:08:28

But I think they're actually had a better sustainable

2:08:30

lever. I mean, do you know in the sixties they're in their gunning

2:08:33

and killing elk because there were too many elk and there

2:08:35

were not enough predators. They were shooting them like

2:08:37

a thousand a year or whatever. They don't have to

2:08:39

do that anymore. There's what six

2:08:41

sixty five hundred elk in the northern herd now

2:08:44

versus twenty thousand, and it's kind

2:08:46

of stabilized at that. And the wolves have

2:08:48

stabilized at about one hundred, and

2:08:50

they've switched to bison. They a lot of their

2:08:53

food value now is bison, which

2:08:55

I must mind modeling me. I'm

2:08:57

not saying they can't limiting. I'm just saying there's

2:09:00

a lot of things going on, and I think the humans

2:09:03

really got used. I've been on one of those late gardener

2:09:05

hunts and.

2:09:06

Oh my god, what is zoo in the eighties.

2:09:09

Yeah, because there were too many elk

2:09:11

they had to do that. Well, they don't do it anymore, and people

2:09:13

are pissed off about it because I want to go down there

2:09:15

and get my late gardener hunt. Well, that is

2:09:17

not a sustainable population to have

2:09:19

to have people go in and kill starving elk in

2:09:22

February. I mean, we

2:09:24

can look at it anywhere you want.

2:09:25

Can we go back to our crystal ball in Colorado?

2:09:27

Oh?

2:09:27

God, yes, was it a

2:09:29

twenty year? We were talking about ten ten twenty years. Okay,

2:09:32

let me hit you with this. Yeah, let's

2:09:34

say there are one

2:09:37

hundred deer in elk in Colorado

2:09:39

today? How

2:09:41

many deer in elk are there in twenty years.

2:09:46

Due too?

2:09:47

Because of wolves?

2:09:48

Oh, because of wolf.

2:09:49

There's one hundred now, Yeah, one hundred deer elk

2:09:51

are in Colorado now. And you do your twenty year crystal

2:09:54

ball. Where has that population settled out?

2:09:57

Eighty or ninety maybe might be one hundred.

2:09:59

The other is people population.

2:10:01

We keep growing in and building. Well,

2:10:04

it is part of it because people build

2:10:06

an elk winter range. Look at the Paradise Valley,

2:10:08

for God's sakes, they've destroyed a lot of elk

2:10:10

wind arrange where they elk used to doing.

2:10:11

Well, that's where the wolves could do that tipping point

2:10:13

there. Yeah, get because like Colorado's

2:10:16

elk or like in

2:10:18

places, their numbers are already crashing

2:10:20

because of black bear predation and elk

2:10:23

calves. And then you get like development

2:10:25

of winter range and then a huge amount

2:10:27

of recreation like hiking

2:10:29

and biking, and then you

2:10:31

throw wolves on top of that, and it's like you

2:10:34

could look at it that way, you

2:10:36

know what's going to happen.

2:10:38

I just look at what's going on in Montana,

2:10:41

where we had wolves for forty years. In Wyoming

2:10:43

they've had wolves for years, and elk numbers

2:10:45

are higher than they've ever been, So

2:10:47

I don't know how. I mean, you could look at whatever

2:10:50

end of the scale you want to look at. I'd like to kind

2:10:52

of come to the middle. There'll be places where wolves can

2:10:54

impact populations. Lions certainly

2:10:56

have, bears have people

2:10:59

have Because we're building holding up into habitat

2:11:01

that is absolutely critical. For those on gillets

2:11:03

in the winter, they don't have it anymore. So

2:11:06

where do they go They become victims to prey

2:11:08

animals or they get hit on the roadway. My

2:11:10

god, driving down from Livingston

2:11:13

to Gardner and the winters like slaloming

2:11:15

through white tail and elk everywhere.

2:11:17

It's awful. So we

2:11:19

could pick whatever data set you want

2:11:22

to use. But they've co existed

2:11:24

long before we were ever in the landscape, That's

2:11:26

all I'm going to say. And before when

2:11:28

Lewis and Clark came to this country on

2:11:31

the with the West, wolves a lot

2:11:33

of wolves and grizzlies, and there was never more

2:11:35

wildlife than there's ever been. Because we've

2:11:37

changed everything and we have an expectation to have it

2:11:39

perfect, you're never going to have that.

2:11:40

When I when I encounter rapidly

2:11:43

anti wolf people. Yeah, right,

2:11:45

Yeah, and

2:11:47

then they'll tell me how they want to go hunt in Alaska.

2:11:50

Yeah, but you wouldn't like.

2:11:51

It, buddy, because.

2:11:54

Because it's ninety seven percent

2:11:56

of historic wolf habitat is occupied

2:11:58

by wolves, you wouldn't like it. There's no hunting

2:12:00

there wolves. What's

2:12:03

the hunt in Alaska?

2:12:03

Does that what you tell them?

2:12:05

Yeah?

2:12:05

Is that true?

2:12:06

No, of course it's not true. Okay, I'm

2:12:08

demonstrating absurdity by being absurd. Thank

2:12:10

you, Steve.

2:12:12

I'm shocked. Okay.

2:12:13

It's my favorite. I mean, I love it. It's my favorite place to

2:12:15

go. But I'm just saying I point out to

2:12:17

them, like, don't

2:12:19

lay it on me that they're incompatible, because tell that

2:12:22

to right, That's that everybody

2:12:24

dreams of going on hunting Alaska. It's like, well, let me tell

2:12:26

you something wolves

2:12:28

while something moves there. A couple of years ago, we'd watched how

2:12:31

many do we see one night? Fifteen

2:12:34

pretty much every evening fifteen to come through.

2:12:36

Wow.

2:12:37

Right, So I'm just saying it that

2:12:39

that perspective, and every

2:12:41

time, like every time we

2:12:43

talk about predators and every time we talk

2:12:45

about wolves, I always feel the need

2:12:47

to clarify like

2:12:50

my perspective on it, I think

2:12:52

it is. I think

2:12:54

it's immoral to

2:12:56

remove native

2:12:59

species from native habitat.

2:13:01

I just think it's like playing God in

2:13:03

a way that, however you want to

2:13:05

conceive of God, it's playing God in the way

2:13:07

that God would not agree with. Right,

2:13:09

It's like it's immoral, I think

2:13:12

to eliminate species from Earth.

2:13:17

I like seeing the tracks. I

2:13:19

like hearing them. I like seeing them.

2:13:23

I do not think they should be eradicated.

2:13:26

I like to try to achieve a

2:13:29

balance of

2:13:32

holding a bunch of different people's interests

2:13:34

in mind, because it's the only way we're going to survive

2:13:36

and live as humans. I think

2:13:38

that what as you said, I think that what's

2:13:42

been achieved here in

2:13:45

Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. It's

2:13:48

not perfect, but it's working,

2:13:51

and I think you would alleviate a

2:13:53

ton of the social stress

2:13:56

in the Upper Great Lakes if they were allowed

2:13:58

to pursue a similar path

2:14:01

with regulated hunting. I

2:14:05

don't know anybody when when wolves

2:14:08

walked into Colorado, of the people I hang out

2:14:10

with and associate with, and hunt with and talk with

2:14:12

all the time, when wolves showed

2:14:14

up in Colorado, I don't know anybody who

2:14:17

said to me they ought to get down there

2:14:19

with helicopters right now and find those wolves

2:14:21

and kill them. No one said that to me, right

2:14:26

h With the reintroduction, I've

2:14:28

had people basically say that if they could do

2:14:30

that, they would do that. It was like there's something about

2:14:33

it that just burns people. Of

2:14:35

course you don't want to there's something about it that they

2:14:37

don't want to them because it's

2:14:39

like it's like there's a way that we accept things

2:14:41

that we perceive to be natural,

2:14:44

and there's a way we accept people accept

2:14:46

things that perceive to be something getting shoved

2:14:48

down their throat, uh and

2:14:50

wolves walking into Colorado. People

2:14:53

kind of had a huh oh.

2:14:55

They they had like a doctorate degree

2:14:57

and pushing that ship down their throats down there.

2:14:59

I couldn't believe when I read that stat of like

2:15:02

Grant County is where they released the first

2:15:04

group, right, and I think that was one of the few

2:15:06

counties that overwhelmingly voted

2:15:09

against it. It was like a sixties

2:15:12

high sixties, maybe seventy percent against

2:15:14

it, and that was the county they chose

2:15:16

to here you go, But they

2:15:18

couldn't.

2:15:19

Reintroduce him into Boulder and Denver.

2:15:21

I mean that's where the boat was while

2:15:23

we're on Colorado again. I think it'd be

2:15:25

great. It'd be great to get

2:15:28

your thoughts, as you know, a

2:15:31

biologist with so much experience on

2:15:33

the ballot box biology that

2:15:35

they're proposing down there, and just

2:15:39

I guess in general, what your thoughts are on

2:15:41

ballot box biology and

2:15:44

if you think that's going to be a and

2:15:47

even you can leave the Mountain lion ban

2:15:49

alone, hunting band alone, but just

2:15:52

in general that if you think that that works

2:15:55

as a way to manage wildlife in our country,

2:15:57

well.

2:15:57

Obviously you feel strongly one way. That's a quite

2:16:00

loaded question, but I the

2:16:02

way you put it, I you'll

2:16:04

read in my book.

2:16:05

Well, the reason I'm interested

2:16:07

is because I feel like you do sit

2:16:09

in the middle and you connect with a lot of people

2:16:12

that I would like to connect to, and I feel

2:16:14

that we would probably land somewhere on the

2:16:17

on the same end of the spectrum and

2:16:20

want the same outcome. So I'd like to

2:16:22

hear how you talk to people

2:16:24

about this.

2:16:25

So I I've never been in favor

2:16:27

of wolf for introductions anywhere because they come

2:16:29

back on their own and there I feel

2:16:31

strongly we can never now test it because

2:16:33

it's too late. But I feel strongly that

2:16:36

there's a better social tolerance just what

2:16:38

you're saying if they come back on their own, like they

2:16:40

have done most places in the world and in the Midwest.

2:16:44

But now that they're here, you can't go backwards.

2:16:46

And wolves got to Oregon,

2:16:50

Washington, Utah, Colorado,

2:16:53

California, it's through dispersal, but they were dispersed

2:16:56

animals from a reintroduced population,

2:16:58

so they will never be thought is native

2:17:00

either, which I think that's

2:17:03

a shame. If we would have let

2:17:06

natural recovery happens just like three you did

2:17:08

in Montana, like it started doing Colorado,

2:17:10

like it's done in the Midwest, I

2:17:12

think we would be further ahead politically, but we'd

2:17:14

have less wolves by this point in time. But

2:17:17

how many years I mean, they were introduced those wolves

2:17:19

almost twenty thirty years ago. Now would

2:17:22

we be at the level we're at now? Probably

2:17:24

pretty close, because once wolves hit critical

2:17:27

mass, they take off without

2:17:29

the social baggage. That's how I feel.

2:17:31

You asked, That's how I feel, So

2:17:34

I don't know if I answered your question or not.

2:17:37

Well, I guess as

2:17:40

someone that's worked with wolves,

2:17:43

like did you like having

2:17:45

in your toolbox. I don't know. Did you ever

2:17:47

consider yourself a manager of wolves?

2:17:50

I'm not, was never up at the

2:17:52

top level I've managed.

2:17:54

I've done some going out and putting out propane

2:17:57

cannons and hanging flattery. Yeah, I've

2:17:59

done some of that.

2:18:00

But you advise people that sort of set management

2:18:03

strategy.

2:18:04

Yes, And I've come and

2:18:06

asked to be a anonymous commentator

2:18:08

on various federal plans.

2:18:09

Yes. So is it nice to have in your

2:18:11

toolbox hunting

2:18:15

as a way to manage these animals?

2:18:17

I think socially you have to have it. I'm not a

2:18:19

wolf hunter. I have no desire

2:18:21

to ever have to kill a wolf. I

2:18:24

don't It's just not who I am. Is

2:18:26

it a socially acceptable

2:18:28

tool? Does it creation social tolerance?

2:18:30

That's that's what people are

2:18:32

pushing and believing, And I think with reintroductions

2:18:36

that may be true. It's

2:18:39

a tough one. Like I said, I don't want to shoot

2:18:41

wolves, and I take lots of dead wolves on tailgates.

2:18:44

When I was working for fishwallfe parks, they come in. I

2:18:46

tagged lions and otters and martins and

2:18:48

wolves, and I always ask the people

2:18:50

the story how did you get

2:18:52

the wolf? Tell me the story of how you hunted

2:18:54

it. That made a difference to me when

2:18:57

I looked at it dead wolves, a dead wolf. But when

2:18:59

I heard some he said it was amazing.

2:19:01

I had an Elk tagnose out and I heard the wolves

2:19:03

howling, and this wolf walked

2:19:05

out, and I thought, my god, that's a magnificent

2:19:07

animal. I really want to I really

2:19:09

want to have it. I want to have a pelt or whatever.

2:19:12

I could understand that. And then people come

2:19:15

and say, these hate, these bastards, we should

2:19:17

shoot everyone them in the state. That really

2:19:19

was difficult. And when I think of that

2:19:21

kind of management that

2:19:24

I feel doesn't do justice

2:19:26

to us as hunters or biologists or

2:19:28

to the wildlife itself. And I really

2:19:30

think a big push we should have

2:19:33

is working with the public on

2:19:35

educating I hate that term, on

2:19:37

exchanging ideas with people what

2:19:39

wolves are and are not. I think there's

2:19:42

not enough information out there for

2:19:45

average person who wonders, well, how many yolk

2:19:47

does a wolf coiller? Or are the impacting

2:19:49

game? Put out all the information unbiased

2:19:52

in a format that people can use. I don't care if

2:19:54

it's a rock amount on Elk Foundation Google

2:19:56

or Outdoor Life or whatever. Montana

2:19:58

magazine put put it in a format

2:20:01

that's available for people

2:20:03

to read and understand. They better at ELK study.

2:20:05

They did.

2:20:06

They put quite a bit of information out, but

2:20:08

that's fade ay. The wolves are still killing

2:20:11

all the Elk. It's like, way, did you.

2:20:13

Read the article?

2:20:14

But people are biased because of their culture,

2:20:17

so I but I just think enough

2:20:19

information helps helps

2:20:22

calm down the flames on both ends. I

2:20:24

am a believer in that, and I hate the term

2:20:26

edgy. I hate it say we need to educate

2:20:28

so and so about that. It's like, oh God, can.

2:20:31

We know what that means? That means I need to tell that person

2:20:33

what I think.

2:20:34

That's right, that's right, but

2:20:37

to exchange information, that's what

2:20:39

well, the public needs to be educated.

2:20:41

No, I don't.

2:20:41

I hate that term, and I heard agencies

2:20:44

promote that all the time. But anyway, cuts

2:20:46

of your book, my

2:20:48

book, I want to hold it up, doctor

2:20:56

Diane boy I'm teasing about randall.

2:21:00

Have PhD written out there?

2:21:01

Of course not, but it's in the back under the bio

2:21:03

because I don't want I don't want people

2:21:05

to see doctor Dian Boyd and not buy it

2:21:08

because they their biases. They just see it's diyanboid.

2:21:10

There you go, that's a bias.

2:21:13

Definitely.

2:21:13

They'd be like, oh.

2:21:18

That one.

2:21:19

They'd be like some Berkeley egg ahead.

2:21:21

Telling me about please exactly,

2:21:25

Diane K.

2:21:25

Boyd not a doctor.

2:21:33

There you go, she's a doctor back here, Yeah,

2:21:36

Diane K. Boyd, a woman among wolves.

2:21:38

My journey through forty years of wolf covery. I

2:21:40

haven't read it. Uh, I

2:21:43

will read it.

2:21:44

I'll give you a personal copy.

2:21:46

I will read it, read it and

2:21:49

again.

2:21:50

Uh.

2:21:51

When we talked before and I loved it. It's

2:21:53

so good to hear your perspective

2:21:56

on these things. I

2:21:59

think a lot of what you're saying, I

2:22:01

think you're gonna what you're saying

2:22:03

is going to be is going to be very challenging.

2:22:07

Two people, no matter what how

2:22:09

they look at wolves. You you offer a very

2:22:11

challenging perspective because

2:22:13

it doesn't fall in line. It

2:22:17

doesn't fall in line with

2:22:20

the narratives that you

2:22:22

would get depending on your culture.

2:22:24

It's like you're you're offering a

2:22:27

really educated, nuanced

2:22:31

view of things that have come from being

2:22:33

in the room for a lot of discussions

2:22:35

over the year. I'm not like, I can't

2:22:38

say that you

2:22:40

know. I can't say that someone would be able

2:22:42

to go and determine that everything

2:22:45

you've said is exactly true

2:22:47

or right. But it's a challenging, like you're

2:22:49

offering a challenging, pretty

2:22:54

gracious, highly educated

2:22:56

perspective on how to think about predators, and

2:22:59

I appreciate you coming with us and doing

2:23:01

that.

2:23:01

Well.

2:23:01

Thanks.

2:23:02

Help people find your book and read it.

2:23:04

Thanks. When I wrote it, I was not allowed

2:23:06

to put in scientific references or footnotes.

2:23:09

I have my list at the end of suggested readings.

2:23:11

But I wrote it so that anybody can pick

2:23:13

it up, whether you like wolves or don't like wolves, or don't

2:23:15

care, regardless of your outdoor

2:23:17

experience. Anybody can pick that up and

2:23:20

get something from it. And

2:23:22

I don't preach. I tell through

2:23:24

stories and I wave science and

2:23:27

let the reader come to their own conclusions about

2:23:29

certain aspects of wolves being on the landscape.

2:23:32

So it's a different kind of a book.

2:23:34

And I lived it. I lived these wolves.

2:23:36

This is my story, and then it morphs

2:23:38

into present time in

2:23:41

twenty twenty three. And if you just like a good adventure

2:23:43

story, there's a lot of stories. I could read you a short thirty

2:23:45

second paragraph if you want. Hell.

2:23:47

Yeah, let's close with that.

2:23:48

Close it the opening introduction.

2:23:50

Yeah, we're going to close with this. So she's gonna get

2:23:53

done. You're gonna go buy the book. We're just going to end

2:23:55

the show. Phil's gonna turn the machine off when it's done.

2:23:57

But this will give you a taste of how it's written, and

2:23:59

I'm looking forward to it.

2:24:00

This is probably thirty five years ago. My

2:24:02

pickup banged and rattled along the potholed

2:24:05

inside road in the northwest corner of Glacier

2:24:07

National Park. Boxes of wolf

2:24:09

trap and jars of bait slid across the truck

2:24:11

bed. I was in a hurry, my mind focused

2:24:13

on the wolf cotton a trap somewhere ahead in the Lodgepole

2:24:16

Pine Forest. Out of the corner

2:24:18

of my eye, I noticed motion in

2:24:20

my rear view mirror. I looked up to

2:24:23

catch the glassy reflection of vivid

2:24:25

yellow eyes framed by a wolf's black

2:24:27

face looking over my shoulder from the

2:24:29

back seat. How did I get here? Opening

2:24:33

paragraph,

2:24:36

Diane, You you got to come back. Appreciate

2:24:39

it, thank you, thank you.

2:24:42

Honest.

2:24:42

You got to keep your shoes on during this podcast,

2:24:49

I'm still recorded.

2:24:57

The koyas

2:25:02

away wone

2:25:05

shooting start with shut

2:25:07

swell being

2:25:12

sign of breakfast, and

2:25:14

we laid down the

2:25:17

bed it's

2:25:19

been on day and nin.

2:25:21

Windyll them

2:25:26

cotting with trees lost

2:25:29

step lesly every breeze.

2:25:34

Master footsteps that I

2:25:36

took.

2:25:40

You on.

2:25:40

The noise was wide like

2:25:43

a live Brian.

2:25:47

Learn more from namn trees before.

2:25:50

Everybod than

2:25:54

ever made shiver

2:25:58

shoot swept.

2:26:01

Waves up in.

2:26:04

My reading up here.

2:26:08

Sometimes you're burning up.

2:26:11

Sometimes you're going with

2:26:14

because you mean you're the fever.

2:26:18

Ragon, don't

2:26:22

you Mainer.

2:26:23

The fur Bagon.

2:26:43

Go on through the plain still

2:26:46

called Basbley in greens.

2:26:51

Gets there all out in them

2:26:53

wield.

2:26:56

You smileings the you

2:26:59

rye all and your minds

2:27:02

be surprised.

2:27:05

That old river.

2:27:07

Minyl

2:27:11

fever makes you shiver,

2:27:14

That fever makes you sweet,

2:27:18

wakes.

2:27:19

You up in babing

2:27:22

permade of you. Sometimes

2:27:27

you're burning up. Sometimes

2:27:29

they're gold man with because

2:27:32

you Mainer fever w

2:27:38

only you anger the

2:27:41

fer bging

2:28:13

that fear macey shiver,

2:28:17

that fere amazing sweat

2:28:21

wis you have and min

2:28:24

be pernain unjust. Sometimes

2:28:29

you're burning up. Sometimes

2:28:31

you're colding w because.

2:28:35

You made yourr feeder cry.

2:28:45

You may you

2:28:49

may CA, You

2:28:56

ain't time.

2:28:59

You wait.

2:29:00

Turded favor, domag

2:29:03

wait fav

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features