Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:08
This is the me Eater podcast
0:11
coming at you shirtless, severely,
0:13
bug bitten, and in my case, underwear listening
0:15
to podcast you
0:18
Can't Predict Anything, brought to
0:20
you by first Light. This week, first Light is
0:22
celebrating its annual White Tail Week,
0:24
where you can tune in for tips, tricks and tactics,
0:27
as well as incredible deals
0:30
site wise. Check it out first light
0:32
dot com, f I R S
0:34
T L I t E dot com.
0:40
You hunt Big Game two?
0:41
I have?
0:42
Yeah, Yeah, I've got a I
0:44
haven't hunted big game in about
0:46
four years now, but I've shot a lot
0:48
of deer, antelope, elk, bighorn,
0:51
sheep, you bears, and I
0:54
just I train dogs and a bird hunt.
0:56
That's what I do now.
0:57
And so that's podcast.
1:03
Yeah, earlier
1:05
this about in the podcast,
1:08
I.
1:08
Might bring that pigeon down here in a couple of days. Let
1:10
him walk around up here.
1:12
At home, build a little roost for him in here.
1:15
Pretty tame, extremely tame. Nice
1:18
when you all it tries to do is get into the house.
1:20
You're kidding me, because it knows people are in the house.
1:23
Did you raise it?
1:24
My kids did?
1:25
It's not going to be a shooter then, right, No,
1:28
you got to.
1:28
Pass for
1:32
forty of his uh roostmates
1:35
went to bird dog trainers.
1:37
Yeah, but this was so what's his
1:39
name?
1:41
Peanut butter? Peanut but because
1:43
there was peanut butter and jelly but jelly, Uh,
1:45
John had to get euthanized. Yeah, I
1:48
had a health had a congenital birth effect
1:50
as far as we can tell.
1:51
Come on, you really did
1:53
euthanize it. You didn't train it?
1:55
Yeah, well it had as
1:58
it started passing its own intestine. Oh
2:01
my god, real buzz kills. Yeah,
2:05
yeah, Brody is over.
2:07
Is peanut Butter aware of the windows
2:09
outside and know where?
2:12
But it knows where the door is. It goes to the door.
2:15
Unbelievable.
2:17
Does it live outside?
2:18
Lives outside?
2:19
Oh?
2:19
Nice, it's at a bird sitters house? Right
2:21
now?
2:22
Did he fly over there?
2:27
You got the pigeon Gooso comes back home.
2:29
This is the start of the show.
2:30
We're already rolling. Give
2:33
me your book. There you go, Phil,
2:40
where's a good spot.
2:41
That's a great spot.
2:42
That looks good. Yeah, we're missing the bottom.
2:44
Quarter of the book of the cover, but we've got the time.
2:48
That's better. That's better. Joined
2:52
today by Diane Boyd, who came
2:55
on the you were on the
2:57
show.
2:57
A while ago, probably five years now.
2:59
Five years ago, way back in episode
3:01
one, six six days. Okay, that was a
3:03
great episode.
3:04
Thanks you made it great.
3:06
We did an episode called Hunting with Teeth with
3:08
Diane Boyd lay
3:10
out your can Can you lay out your your an
3:13
abbreviated form of your resume so people
3:15
know what you're all about?
3:16
Oh golly, yeah. I started working
3:18
with wolves in Minnesota in nineteen
3:20
seventy six. I was just
3:22
a child prodigy, Not really, I'm just old. And
3:25
anyway, I picked up Minnesota
3:27
wolves. I went worked in Wild the Wolves in Northern
3:29
Minnesota, and then I worked as a
3:31
for one summer before I came to Montana
3:33
as a depredation control trapper
3:37
and research collar northern Minnesota.
3:39
And then I moved to Montana in seventy nine
3:41
to pursue a couple of graduate degrees.
3:43
And I basically started
3:45
with the first wolf that walked down from
3:48
Canada and have maintained wolf
3:52
reintroduction, recolonization
3:55
information, all those yeares so kind
3:57
of from the first wolf to three thousand wolf.
4:00
Now that's what we got in the West.
4:01
Got it? And reason I like the
4:03
reason I like Diane Boyd and reach
4:06
he's back on the show. Is you
4:08
caught a lot of the hysteria and
4:13
a lot of the on each side.
4:17
If I don't know it, it's not right, especially
4:19
in today's climate of an election season.
4:21
I don't want to put it as the left and the right. How do
4:23
you put it the inn and the yang? Now? Okay,
4:28
if this can you see the book
4:30
and my hand film, if
4:32
this is attitudes of wolves,
4:35
and this is what this side
4:37
is that they're going to kill your children, okay?
4:41
And this side is that they
4:44
snuggle fawns.
4:45
They're going to save the planet, that
4:47
they're gonna.
4:48
Yeah, they're gonna save the planet, and and
4:50
and and reverse climate change. Diane
4:55
Boyd is, I don't want to have you be the middle finger.
4:57
That's a bad thing.
5:00
I'm gonna move this finger over where the middle finger
5:02
lives.
5:03
Great because it's like diet.
5:05
Yeah, she gives the middle finger to the sides.
5:09
I like that.
5:09
Never that way.
5:12
And she's got a new book coming out,
5:14
A Woman among Wolves, My Journey through forty
5:17
Years of Wolf Recovery. When is it available?
5:20
Right?
5:21
So it's coming out September tenth, it's
5:23
being released and you can pre ordered
5:25
on Amazon and
5:27
Barnes and Nobles. It's up there now, got
5:30
it.
5:31
My mom's husband, my mom got married. After my dad
5:33
died, my mom got remarried. Now that guy passed
5:35
away. You know he called Barnes and Noble. He
5:38
called it books and Nobles.
5:40
Wow, makes
5:43
sense.
5:43
Yeah, it was MacDonald's and it was
5:45
Books and Nobles.
5:49
Uh, case you forget later.
5:51
I think you should ask Diane. She's gonna read
5:54
her own audiobook.
5:56
Oh listen, I'm
5:59
gonna tell you the
6:02
audiobook. Don't don't have them to do a person.
6:05
Don't bring in a soap opera person. Who's
6:07
going to do the audiobook.
6:08
It's got to be you. Do you want to start a little
6:11
bit? So my Graystone
6:13
Publishing sold the audio rights to a media
6:15
company.
6:16
Ye, and that's how that's
6:18
normal.
6:18
They hired a professional actress
6:20
to read.
6:21
Did you really come in there and complain?
6:23
Well?
6:23
I didn't know that, And then when I found out,
6:26
I just said, well, you know, I know the story
6:28
pretty well, and I do a lot of public speaking,
6:30
and I think I've got an engaging voice,
6:32
even with my Fargo accent. So
6:35
they had me send an audio edition and
6:37
they wrote me back and he said, well,
6:40
if you want to do the reading, we're going to have to basically
6:43
train you and it's going to take a lot
6:45
of time and blah blah blah blah.
6:47
So you know why they're telling me that they
6:49
got these holsers that do it all the time.
6:52
Okay, and they come in they know they're going to get it done
6:54
in two days whatever. Don't
6:57
let that happen. I let that happen
6:59
before, and I've mentioned
7:01
bunch of times. I let that happen before. I
7:04
got the thing in. I
7:06
turned it on and I could not cross
7:08
the room quick enough to turn it off the
7:11
minute that person opened their mouth, Because
7:14
like, you live your work, yeah
7:17
right, and when you're writing it, you're it's
7:19
you. You're it's you know what I mean. You're doing
7:21
it, you're saying it, you're reading it to yourself, you're
7:23
making it perfect, and then some other person picks
7:25
it up and touches it. It's like watching It's
7:29
like, are you married? No, If
7:32
you were, it
7:35
would be like watching someone
7:37
handle your husband.
7:39
That was an impossibility. I was married briefly,
7:43
Okay, I get it.
7:44
You get it.
7:45
Picture that you were still married. You
7:47
really liked him, and you had to watch
7:50
someone else, right.
7:53
No go. But anyway,
7:55
I the other thing was they're doing
7:57
this. They wanted to be done when the book
7:59
is released in September tenth, and I'm
8:02
going bird hunting. I mean, I got stuff to
8:04
do, and I actually just don't. At
8:07
this point, I just threw my hands upisode whatever.
8:09
Yeah, I'm okay,
8:13
thank you though.
8:15
Next time, next time.
8:17
I appreciate the advice.
8:18
Yeah, I knew.
8:20
Whitetail Week coming up here at me
8:22
Eiter one week only nine to thirty to ten six.
8:26
White Tail Week's the best time stock
8:28
up on whitetail gear with deals from first
8:30
like FHF Gear, Phelps, game calls, Dave Smith,
8:33
Decoy's at the me Eater store,
8:37
plus a full
8:39
week of white tail content we've done he's
8:41
in the past. It's like, you know, there's
8:44
a TV channel that
8:46
has a they celebrate a fish all week
8:48
every year. It's
8:51
like that, but it's for people that like white tails. Oh
8:54
you know, it's funny. I'm
8:57
working on this new project and
9:00
we got to do a bunch of scuba diving over the last week,
9:02
and we had these underwater It's
9:05
like an you can talk underwater. It's
9:08
a special mask like you don't, you know, normally use
9:10
a you have like a breathing apparatus and a regular
9:12
mask. But it's this big contained things you can hold a button
9:14
like talk underwater to people, it's
9:16
hard to be heard
9:20
and h it's just
9:22
it's not a perfect system, as you can imagine talking
9:24
underwater and
9:28
someone so we rented
9:31
this equipment from this place that rents this stuff
9:33
out, and like, well, how in the world on Shark
9:35
Week are they all talking to each other underwater? He
9:38
goes, Oh, they dubed that all the uh
9:45
mid uh
9:48
this is you folks will appreciate
9:50
this. Sometime between mid and end
9:52
of September, The
9:56
Fucked Up Bullshitters Calendar is out. It's the third
9:58
in our ft up series. We the Deer
10:00
Stands Taxidermy
10:03
and now it shitters. Some of the
10:05
world's best
10:08
and worst worst not
10:10
best, yeah, the best
10:12
of the worst old shitters laying
10:14
around out in the woods from
10:17
the Arctic to the Midwest
10:21
and probably points south.
10:22
Did you do captions this time?
10:23
Oh?
10:24
Yeah, great captions.
10:25
Oh yeah, I don't know that I'd say that they're
10:27
all the worst because some of them are
10:29
just intriguing intriguing,
10:31
like you you'd want to give them a run.
10:34
Yeah, carved out a giant tree stumps. So
10:37
like one, Yeah, one is sort of I don't know
10:39
what. It looks like, a giant redwood or a sequoia or
10:41
something. I don't know what it is, probably not. No, it's a cedar,
10:44
a huge Western red seedar, that's what it is.
10:47
And they carved a shitter out of a Western
10:49
red seater. It's beautiful. So in the caption
10:51
process, we sit around thinking of what would
10:53
be funny, and we're like, something
10:55
to do with e walks would be funny, and
10:58
then you work that into a caption. There's
11:00
one that is very Southwest
11:04
and when I looked at it, I thought of the Alamo. And
11:06
so then you work up a caption that's like a joke about
11:10
the Alamo. That's
11:13
all that process.
11:14
Are there any uh outhouses
11:17
or ships that you wouldn't want to Oh?
11:19
Yeah, there are.
11:24
I'd say the one I wouldn't want to do the want need
11:26
of an upholstery job.
11:28
I wouldn't touch that thing until someone's
11:31
mm hmm.
11:32
There was definitely something that made
11:34
me lose my faith in humanity, like gross
11:37
like stuff.
11:38
That didn't make the cut. There's nothing gross
11:40
about the count.
11:40
No, no, no,
11:44
we had some gross submissions, a
11:46
lot.
11:47
Of gross submissions. There was none of our submissions
11:49
has none
11:51
of the submissions are like poor etiquette.
11:54
None of the submissions. There's no there's
11:57
no fecal matter. There were a.
11:59
Couple that you guys didn't see that.
12:00
We're being used the
12:03
people send in.
12:04
Oh you cut those out. We have no people
12:06
in it.
12:07
I didn't.
12:07
I didn't think they'd make the cut, so I didn't
12:09
send those alone.
12:10
It's twelve months, that's
12:12
how many months, or in a year, it's
12:15
twelve months of beautiful
12:19
photography of if you were wandering around out
12:21
in the woods, or wandering around up in the Arctic,
12:24
or wandering around wherever, and
12:26
you came into a and you came across
12:28
an old shitter, and you're like, gow
12:31
the stories that old shitter could
12:34
tell, that's what this calendar is all
12:36
about.
12:37
And they're all shitters you'd tell someone about. Oh,
12:40
you're like, you wouldn't believe what I found.
12:41
Oh yeah, If you were hunting with your buddy or whatever,
12:44
and you went off to go check on something and
12:46
you encountered one of these shitters
12:49
and you came back. I don't care. If you saw
12:55
two booner bucks fighting and stuck
12:57
together, you'd
12:59
run back to your body and you'd be like, you
13:01
would not believe the shitter. I just saw it.
13:03
Oh.
13:03
Plus, there's two booner bucks stuck together
13:05
over there. That's
13:08
how that that's the quality of these shitters.
13:10
Like recently, I was was last
13:12
hunting season, I was up on the Rocky Mountain
13:14
front, and that Augusta showedo zone.
13:17
You've probably Randall. Seems like you've
13:20
been to every bar in every small town in Montana's
13:22
you've probably been to this one. But in
13:24
their bathrooms they have pictures
13:27
of uh some outhouses. And one
13:29
of the favorite ones I've seen, it's like it's you can
13:31
see the front, but the outhouses
13:33
out in the flats and it's
13:36
got these it looks like two telephone
13:38
poles that are wedged like between it's
13:40
like upper corners at the eve and the
13:42
ground, just basically
13:45
meaning that the wind blows so hard
13:47
there that if this outhouse isn't
13:49
supported with telephone poles, like you
13:51
know at an angle.
13:52
It's gonna lift it off.
13:54
Yeah, or at least that
13:57
was brutalized by the wind. Pretty good.
13:59
Yeah, just there's just you're
14:02
looking down a hill and you can just see the
14:04
the shitter blown
14:06
off away. We also had a lot
14:08
of tandems, and we only put one tandem
14:11
in because I don't I don't really
14:13
understand, like my
14:15
when my little kids were littler,
14:18
I could see them utilizing
14:20
a tandem, but.
14:21
You wouldn't park next to you on in
14:23
the morning.
14:24
They're not going to utilize the tandem, right.
14:27
I know of a use for a tandem out house
14:29
at the pace. So my first year up there
14:31
in seventy nine, got Giardia
14:33
and there was a two seater outhouse and
14:36
there was a moment one day when
14:38
I needed to use both holes
14:40
at the same time, just
14:45
saying.
14:47
Yeah, do
14:49
you know what the next installment of ft
14:52
UP.
14:52
I want to do. It's a it's a photographic
14:55
challenge. I want to do fish cleaning stations
14:58
or just fucked up old fisher man. But
15:04
I'd like to do fish cleaning stations, just the nastiest,
15:07
grossest fish clean stations. But it's
15:09
hard to capture the smell. Never
15:12
scratch and sniff. When you were a kid, if
15:14
you could scratch and sniff old
15:16
fish cleaning stations.
15:20
Hit too nice. Now
15:22
after the fix up joke.
15:24
It wouldn't even be good anymore. I know we got
15:26
ruined for that. Yeah, I'm not sure,
15:28
but this one is. This one is great if you
15:30
know someone else appreciates an old
15:32
out house. Oh one of these old out
15:34
houses that got caught on fire and
15:37
put out. And I was trying
15:39
to think of a taco bell joke fire
15:44
too many flaming hot cheetos. But
15:48
I think on that one, the joke landed around
15:50
like it was from Southeast Alaska, and
15:53
I think the joke was something about how hard it is
15:55
to get anything to burn in southeast Alaska,
15:58
but nothing wants to burn there, so
16:00
how would you get, you know, some kind of joke like that.
16:03
A couple thoughts from Helfelfinger on
16:05
a past episode. It's
16:08
a rebuttal, it's a retraction. It's
16:10
actually not. It's a fortification. But
16:15
half a Finger had a good quote. It's not his quote.
16:17
He wrote it down. A retraction
16:21
never gets the traction of
16:23
the reaction to
16:25
the original action.
16:28
Once again, a retraction never gets the
16:32
from the top. A
16:34
retraction never gets
16:37
the traction of
16:39
the reaction to the
16:42
original action. A
16:45
great illustration of that would be
16:47
when it came out two
16:50
I can think of years ago, it
16:52
came out that like a guy supposedly
16:54
got died from
16:57
eating squirrel brains, and
17:01
then it was all that was everywhere.
17:04
Every news agency picked this article up,
17:08
and then it came out, well, actually,
17:11
no, he just died of a brain disease.
17:14
And in his past he had eaten a squirrel
17:16
brain. So
17:18
of the one hundred or two hundred people that die
17:20
of this every year, he happened
17:23
in his history had eaten a squirrel brain. And
17:25
it just didn't quite
17:27
get the traction of the reaction to the original
17:29
action. I
17:32
was commenting. I used to always tell people.
17:34
I used to somehow, somehow, it was told
17:37
to me that automobile insurance
17:39
companies often
17:41
pushed to reduce deer numbers so
17:43
that to reduce their premium
17:46
load from all the
17:48
claims made from crashing and cars
17:51
hitting things. So agricultural
17:54
interests, and I would say, automobile interests,
17:56
automobile insurance interests would like to
18:00
suppressed dear numbers. Now
18:03
helfle Finger, I don't know where he hangs
18:05
out. He's saying automobile
18:08
insurance companies plural
18:13
have told Helfflefinger personally
18:15
they have no interest in spending any money to reduce
18:18
audio collisions because
18:20
they just run the numbers and charge whatever premium
18:23
they need to cover collisions with deer, while
18:26
they want to spend time or money on something
18:28
that might reduce deer collisions like overpasses,
18:31
when they can just simply take it into consideration
18:33
when they do all their math, they
18:39
pass it along to the consumer also,
18:45
so Hefflefinger commented on that. Hefflefinger
18:48
commented on this. We
18:52
were discussing a plan taking
18:54
route in Oklahoma and elsewhere
18:56
of taking this is a little bit
18:58
complicated. Some white tailed
19:00
deer farmers, white tail deer ranchers that
19:03
hell you call them, that believe
19:05
they have some deer that are resistant to CWD,
19:09
meaning they'll have a population deer and some de just
19:11
don't get it. And
19:13
they're saying, hey, we should take these deer that don't get
19:15
it and seed wild populations
19:18
with our resistant deer in the hopes
19:20
of sort of speeding along or
19:22
making you
19:24
know, these deer have a g mutation that makes
19:26
them not so susceptible. Let's
19:29
put them out in the wild, and hopefully they'll breed
19:31
with wild deer and eventually we will create this CWD
19:34
resistant wild deer herds, which
19:36
just strikes me as like incredibly dubious
19:40
health. A finger says, deer with that genetic
19:42
combo are not resistant to
19:44
c w D. They just don't die as fast,
19:48
and it's not a good thing to have CWD
19:51
positive deer running around for a longer period
19:53
of time in the environment shutting infectious
19:56
prions. I can't remember if I decided on preons
19:58
or prions.
19:59
What do you say, primes?
20:01
Okay, so I'm gonna stick with the
20:04
Pandora's box is that when you intensively
20:06
select for those CWD
20:09
related genes in captivity, you are
20:11
also selecting for other genes that are
20:13
close to them on the same chromosome.
20:17
Genes that are physically close to one another
20:19
on the same chromosome are inherited
20:21
together at a higher rate. We
20:24
have no idea what those other
20:26
nearby genes are. They
20:29
might be genes that lower reproductive rate,
20:32
produce smaller antlers, a
20:34
higher susceptibility to other diseases.
20:37
Tameness, who knows.
20:41
It's just a bad idea to circumvent
20:43
natural selection for a lot of reasons, and this
20:45
would never move the needle on CWD
20:47
spread or prevalence in the wild.
20:50
These genes associated with deer surviving
20:53
longer with CWD are in fact increasing
20:55
in frequency in the wild populations
20:58
through natural selection, but very
21:00
slowly. Steve's point
21:03
is right. Ha, that's
21:05
my favorite part of the letter. I
21:08
don't even know what I said. This
21:11
makes me feel like when I
21:14
once every five years and I go bowling, and I always
21:16
get like at least one strike. Steve's
21:19
point is right that releasing a few more
21:21
of those animals from captivity is not going to
21:23
change gene frequencies in a free ranging
21:26
wild population and has the potential
21:28
to do harm. He goes on to
21:30
say, if you like Sonoran hot dogs, Guero,
21:36
which I do, well, I think that's what he's talking
21:38
about. Who's
21:40
gonna take a stab at this?
21:41
Guero Canelo?
21:43
Guero Canelo very
21:47
good, top ten and two
21:50
sound number one in his opinion, But prices
21:52
have gone up in a way that the exceeds the quality
21:54
of the food.
21:55
He says, no, no, no, no, Guero
21:57
Canelo is where I always take you. He's
21:59
giving you a
22:02
another option.
22:05
Yeah, we plugged Guero Canelo in
22:07
a Trivia episode.
22:08
Oh, and he's saying, las cerrita del roro,
22:11
h is a better Mexican
22:14
hot dog.
22:17
I think it's La care delro
22:20
but you're close. Is that as good? That's
22:22
in Tucson as well, Yes, where
22:25
the Snoran dogs are famous, and
22:27
it looks way different. And I think
22:29
he can didn't he read what goes
22:31
on there and what is?
22:36
Or he wrote sorry, but yep,
22:39
Jim, if you Jim's got his eyes on a
22:41
good Mexican hot dog. Another
22:48
rebuttal. This is a rebuttal from
22:50
Bubbly Doug.
22:51
We're gonna eat him in January.
22:52
Half a finger. Bubbly Doug are sort of the main
22:55
rebuttal generators and clarification generators,
23:00
but.
23:00
This is from Doug's splash like a friend.
23:02
Doug's friend you.
23:04
Doug's friend is very annoyed about something I said about
23:06
c w D. And I've said this, and I've said it
23:09
before. I don't love if I'll say it again. But there's
23:11
a there's a point I often make, and
23:13
and all it always irritates
23:16
some people, but I just I say
23:18
it because it's just it's a true feeling that I
23:20
have in discussing chronic
23:22
waste and disease in deer, I
23:25
often say the thing most
23:27
scary. This is not what I say, but I'm trying
23:29
to say it in cleaner terms.
23:33
What's horrifying to me is that some
23:37
hunter out there. It
23:41
horrifies me that some hunter out there would contract CWD
23:44
from a deer and it would jump the species
23:46
barrier. And so because it because
23:49
it's so alarming to me, it's so scary to me, I'll
23:52
often say that that I'll put some
23:55
statistic around it where I'll try to say, you
23:57
know, I might say something to the effect of ninety
24:00
percent of my concern about chronic waste
24:02
and diseases, it's going to pass to some that
24:05
some hunter is gonna get it. And if it were to jump the
24:07
species barrier, just it would just change deer
24:10
hunting. It would change deer management,
24:13
it would change deer hunting, it would change the perception
24:15
of deer, like we put a huge cultural
24:17
value on deer if they were this
24:19
thing that was causing you
24:23
know, like like these sort of like horrible
24:25
prolonged deaths from like prion
24:28
diseases and humans. I mean, it's it's just disgusting
24:30
to even think about. So when I track see
24:33
when I when I follow news about CWD
24:35
and try to advocate on behalf of research
24:37
around CWD and trying to stop the spread of
24:39
CWD. A huge part of my
24:41
motivation is that, like, it just makes
24:43
me sick to think about anyone,
24:48
my kids, whatever, somehow doing this
24:50
and the implication how it would affect my diet. That's
24:52
kind of like the main thing I'd like to eat. Dear
24:54
me, Uh,
24:56
this does not go over well with some people,
24:59
and don't Ug's friend who's
25:01
a landowner farmer in the state
25:03
of Washington. She
25:06
says, if Steve's biggest concern with CWD
25:08
is the potential risk to humans, it
25:11
feels contradictory to the values
25:13
he often expresses as a conservationist.
25:19
You could be a humanist and a conservation at
25:21
the same time. But back to
25:23
the letter, it gives the impression
25:25
that he values animal welfare less
25:27
than he claims, which
25:29
stands in contrast to his usual corn
25:32
arguments against vegans that he likely
25:34
cares more for animals and understands
25:36
them better than they do. It's
25:38
frustrating to hear him repeatedly say
25:40
that his greatest worry is the disease
25:43
jumping to humans when animal
25:45
welfare is at stake right now, it's
25:48
not just Doug who's upset about this, me too.
25:52
And she goes on as well to
25:55
counter my observation that if
25:58
another thing I've said about CWD, then we'renna leave.
26:00
I'm gonna leave the subject behind for a minute. Another thing I
26:02
will frequently say about CWD is
26:05
how can it be? Or why is it that
26:07
I'm so afraid of it jumping the species
26:10
barrier to humans. I
26:12
would feel that livestock
26:15
producers would
26:18
be more afraid than I am,
26:20
because, as I said, a
26:24
cow in
26:26
a sheep look
26:28
a hell of a lot more like a deer than I do.
26:31
All you gotta look at is like what happened with mad
26:33
cow disease written right, they can
26:35
imagine that across the entire United
26:37
States.
26:38
Correct what it would do to the cattle
26:40
ustry. And this person is
26:43
countering. She's
26:45
saying, I don't think they're not
26:47
worried about this. I
26:53
can't really do a tit for tat on that issue. I understand
26:55
what you're saying about animal welfare. I'm just
26:57
telling you a thing that like, like, for instance,
27:00
when my kids out playing in the road, okay,
27:05
and I get nervous that they're chasing
27:07
there, that they're that they go to chase their baseball
27:10
across the highway without
27:12
looking. And I'm like, man, the
27:14
main thing that worries me about my kid
27:17
chasing the ball across the highway
27:19
is that my kid will get hit by a car. Someone
27:21
would say like, well, that doesn't go with
27:24
your view as a conservationist, because why
27:26
are you not so worried about the deer that get hit
27:28
on the road. Aren't you worried about animal
27:30
welfare? I'm like, yes, not as worried any
27:32
about my kid get hit on the road.
27:34
Yeah.
27:34
I mean I read
27:36
this as like the only thing you're concerned
27:39
about is humans. But what I said, I
27:41
know, but that's what it kind
27:43
of sounds like she's saying here, like you can be
27:45
concerned about humans and worry about the
27:47
deer herds too.
27:48
Yeah. When I see a deer run across the room, I was like the
27:52
driver I freaked out on. I was in the
27:54
pastor's seat and I freaked out on. The guy'd be like, slow down,
27:57
dude, how do you know there's not more.
27:58
I think that she's just I think it's a she.
28:01
I don't know why it is because.
28:05
And the fact that he says she.
28:06
But I think she's pointing out that maybe
28:09
there's a constant O middle when
28:12
you talk about CWD, about that
28:14
part, I always qualify that part.
28:16
I also think it's hard to I
28:18
mean, the CWD
28:21
is going to be a lot worse for deer if
28:23
people get it from deer, Like, if
28:25
you're concerned about deer as a whole, if
28:28
it jumps the species barrier, CWD
28:30
is going to be a much worse outcome
28:32
for our white tail populations
28:35
as a whole.
28:35
And if it jumps the species, yeah,
28:37
if it jumps the species barrier into cattle,
28:40
and all of a sudden, we have to have the same conversations
28:43
about deer and CWD as
28:45
we do about free ranging buffalo
28:48
and cattle because of brucellosis. And
28:50
people are like, hey, man, if the
28:52
state owns the deer, keep those deer away
28:54
from my place.
28:56
Yeah, it's a it's
28:58
a much darker picture for not
29:00
only people, but the health of deer
29:02
as a whole if that were to happen.
29:04
And I don't omit. The other thing I don't
29:06
omit the other thing the same way. When I'm driving,
29:09
or I'm right in the car and I see a deer
29:11
cross and I see that the driver that I'm
29:13
with isn't thinking about how there's probably
29:15
some following it, and I'm like, dude, so now come
29:17
on. But
29:21
if I saw a kid run across the road, my reaction
29:24
is going to be even stronger. I'm
29:26
gonna get out and yelled the kid.
29:27
Yeah.
29:27
I think it's perfectly normal to be more worried about
29:29
your kids than deer.
29:33
Then you are worried about like the welfare
29:35
of a deer, or deer is
29:37
a population.
29:38
I do worry.
29:39
Yeah, let me ask you this.
29:40
I think it's pretty valid.
29:41
If I could guarantee you that it
29:44
would not jump the species barrier, but you
29:46
could get rid of it by snapping your fingers, would
29:48
you still get rid of CWD?
29:51
Oh? Yeah, I mean that's the course.
29:52
And let's say it's like you can you can be worried about
29:55
one thing more than the other, but still have
29:57
concern for cw
30:00
D as a problem for deer.
30:02
If we could spend money and get rid of EHD
30:05
in blue tongue, I'd be like, oh, let's go spend
30:07
the money and get rid of HD. In blue tongue, Yeah,
30:09
it's like it upsets any It upsets equilibrium
30:12
and causes a lot of trouble for deer hunters when their
30:14
area gets wiped out. It's like rags the
30:16
riches on deer populations, where you get a lot of deer and
30:18
all of a sudden you're like, well, we got a lot now, but now
30:21
that we got this many, just wait for EHD to come through
30:23
and then they'll be laying dead on the side of some pond. I
30:27
would still think we should spend much money, and like, here's
30:29
the thing too, from their perspective,
30:32
that's the reason I'm always advocating on research,
30:36
Like, knowing that there's that risk out there, study
30:38
the hell out of it. I think they should be.
30:41
I think there should be a lot of money getting pumped into studying
30:43
it. It's not like that perspective is not adversarial
30:46
to want to control what's
30:49
going on. Who
30:51
else to talk about?
30:52
Wolves?
30:53
Me?
30:58
Where do we start? Let
31:01
me ask you this question. Can I remind
31:04
you of something you told me the last time?
31:05
Oh?
31:05
Yeah, sure, the
31:08
last time you were on the show. And I
31:10
want to pick this up and have you extend that logic.
31:13
I want to see if you still feel that way, and if you
31:15
would extend it to Colorado and just
31:17
just run with this. You
31:20
said something that surprised me when you were on the show before.
31:23
You had said, had
31:28
we never did we
31:30
humans America's Americans? Whatever?
31:33
Had we never conducted had we decided
31:35
to not do a reintroduction
31:38
of wolves in Yellowstone
31:41
National Park in the frank Church Wilderness area,
31:43
meaning have we not gone and live
31:46
captured wolves elsewhere and
31:48
brought them to turn them loose? We
31:52
probably would have. I can't remember the exact way
31:54
you put it. We probably would have eventually
31:58
landed in the same spot we're at right
32:00
now. From natural migration.
32:03
Yes, I still feel that way. And
32:06
the only so wolves are expanding
32:09
globally in Canada. They're
32:11
all over the Midwest here in
32:13
our west Europe, and the
32:15
only place where wolves have been reintroduced
32:18
was Yellowstone and the frank
32:20
Church Mexican
32:22
wolves, red wolves. But wolves have globally
32:25
expanded without any reintroduction.
32:27
There's wolves in the Netherlands. Now, there's wolves
32:29
in Denmark. Nobody put them there.
32:31
Wolves have been getting there on their own
32:34
and the wolves did get to Colorado. They've
32:36
had the first reproduction I think it was twenty
32:38
twenty or twenty twenty one from Wyoming wolves,
32:41
and those wolves ended up boot them being killed,
32:43
but they were getting there on their own. And
32:46
I feel very strongly that where
32:48
Colorado is at since twenty
32:51
twenty is about where we were at in Montana
32:54
in nineteen seventy nine eighty when a
32:56
few wolves started walking
32:58
down on their own power from Canada and
33:01
slowly got a toe hold, so to speak,
33:04
and repopulated on their own.
33:08
Can you mentioned the Great Lakes? Can you move over?
33:10
Can we move over real quick to the Great Lakes? And you can touch
33:12
on that real quick? Talk
33:16
about that for a men like no reintroduction?
33:18
Right, if
33:20
we look at in the
33:23
northern Great Lakes, we have Minnesota,
33:27
Wisconsin, Michigan, anyone
33:29
else have a stable
33:31
viable population.
33:32
No Ile Royal. There was a recent
33:34
reintroduction to Ile Royal because
33:37
the wolves are dying out other than that
33:39
Michigan waters.
33:40
Yes, can you give
33:43
a little crash course on how were
33:46
they ever gone gone?
33:47
No?
33:48
Good question.
33:49
So when I left Minnesota in nineteen seventy
33:51
nine working with wolves, there was just
33:53
under a thousand wolves, nine hundred to one thousand wolves
33:55
in Minnesota. There was a handful
33:58
in Wisconsin, probably less than a dozen.
34:01
There was maybe twenty five in Isle Royal
34:03
that had gotten their late forties early fifties
34:05
by crossing the frozen Lake Superior ice
34:08
and that was it. And now there's
34:11
I'm trying to think of the numbers of wolves in the Midwest.
34:13
It's over a thousand, might be a couple thousand,
34:15
three thousand. I'm trying to think, have.
34:17
They been extirpated from Michigan.
34:20
Yes, they're extirpated from Michigan and Wisconsin.
34:23
They were never extirpated from Minnesota
34:25
because the northern fourth or third of the state
34:27
is too remote roadless, so there
34:30
always was a stronghold. And I'm trying to think.
34:32
You're not calling me a liar when I say that I saw
34:34
a wolf track in the eastern up
34:36
in nineteen ninety four.
34:37
Are no, no what I saw?
34:39
I fight you?
34:40
No.
34:40
Absolutely, I'm saying viable populations
34:43
breading reproducing established packs.
34:45
No.
34:45
Because my friend Dick Theo was documenting wolves
34:47
recovering to Wisconsin starting and I think I
34:50
think he saw his first wolf track in like seventy
34:52
two or seventy three, they were trying
34:54
and Michigan same thing. And actually
34:57
there was a reintroduction into Michigan
35:00
in the up. It's nineteen
35:03
seventy, seventy four to seventy
35:05
eight, somewhere in there. Seventy four you can read
35:07
about. It's in my book. And they took
35:10
four wolves from Minnesota and
35:12
they transplanted them, reintroduced
35:14
them to northern Michigan. It was during just
35:17
before deer seasons, were they really and they eventually
35:19
all four were killed pretty quickly, So
35:21
that.
35:22
What people guns, animal
35:24
rights people.
35:26
Failing sorry for him in the Michigan winters.
35:30
So that was actually the very first
35:32
wolf for introduction that I'm aware of, and people
35:34
don't.
35:35
Often who did that reinduction.
35:37
It was like the state was it
35:39
real hot politically at the time.
35:41
You you didn't know about it. I'd say, no, it wasn't
35:43
right.
35:43
It's no internet, right, no.
35:45
Internet, no Facebook and on social
35:48
media. So it was done. They
35:50
were held a little while in a pen
35:53
and then they were let go, and that was the model
35:55
for how they were going to reintroduce to wolf seat
35:57
to Yellowstone. So Yellowstone wasn't Yellowstone,
35:59
Ido. Wasn't the first reintroduction
36:02
Michigan.
36:03
Was they took them from Minnesota and put them in Michigan. Yes,
36:05
I'm from Michigan. I didn't know that.
36:07
Google it.
36:08
Try it Michigan wolf for introduction
36:10
if you're so,
36:13
and look in the seventies, I think seventy
36:15
four. So yeah, but none of them
36:17
made it. And it wasn't that they didn't know
36:19
how to hunter, didn't know how to find their
36:21
way around because they're wild wolves, just
36:23
that too many people with guns. So
36:26
anyway, that was you asked. That was the first. And
36:29
then of course our wolves were coming down into
36:32
Montana from the North Country
36:34
from Canada on their own.
36:35
What year were they so
36:40
in the Rockies? So let's leave the Upper
36:42
Midwest out of it. Yeah, so we'll go from
36:44
like the hundredths of Meridian west
36:46
or whatever. Kay, in
36:50
what year can
36:52
you say with some certainty there were no wolves
36:56
south of the Canadian border in
36:59
the whole west in the Yeah, in the whole West?
37:01
Well the statement so wolves
37:03
have always trickled down, So I can't
37:05
say there was never a wolf. But
37:07
in terms of a viable breeding surviving.
37:10
Oh no, no, I want to hear about that a little bit.
37:11
Okay, So by they say generally by the nineteen
37:14
thirties wolves were extirpated as
37:16
a viable population in the West. But
37:18
I know of individual people like
37:20
what you just said, who saw wolves, wolf
37:23
tracks a wolf. There
37:25
was a wolf shot in Glacier Park
37:27
in nineteen fifty three. There was another wolf
37:30
shot outside of Bulbridge in nineteen seventy.
37:32
There's individual shot, they get run over, they
37:34
show up. But in terms of
37:37
a viable, reproducing population, nineteen
37:39
thirties is pretty well the date that they've chosen.
37:42
Okay, But
37:44
since from nineteen thirty
37:48
up until they will come to focus on
37:51
when a vible population came Yeah, at any
37:53
time along that there could
37:55
have been singles that
37:57
would come down from camp.
37:58
Yeah, and I hearing from people
38:00
who live over on the on the Rocky Mountain
38:03
Front, the Blackfoot
38:05
Indian Reservation, Glacier Park, it's
38:07
pretty remote, inaccessible, badger
38:09
to med and people have seen
38:12
wolves there more
38:14
commonly than other parts of Montana. And then
38:16
of course they don't survive in eastern Montana because.
38:18
They got nowhere to hide.
38:19
They show up, boom, they're dead.
38:20
Got it.
38:21
So there's been a little bit, but not reproduction.
38:25
Okay, And then when
38:29
did they start coming down and getting a foothold? And how did
38:31
that? How did that work? They keep using
38:33
toll holding foothold, which.
38:34
Is which is there's They don't forget legholds
38:38
anyway, one of my better
38:40
tools. Sorry, did you
38:42
find it?
38:43
Yeah?
38:43
Go ahead.
38:44
A failed attempt by Northern Michigan University
38:46
and the Michigan DNR to reintroduce four
38:49
wolves to the Upper Peninsula occurred in nineteen
38:51
seventy four. See Eventually
38:55
wolves move from Wisconsin to Upper Michigan
38:57
following strong prey
39:00
populations in the early nineties. When'd
39:02
you see that wolf track?
39:03
I saw a wolf track in nineteen ninety four?
39:05
Eastern up that that corroborates
39:08
your your story, Try
39:12
and trap right again.
39:16
That's not far from the final resting place
39:18
of my dog, Duchess.
39:20
Wolves got her?
39:21
Huh Nope, two
39:23
guys named Ben and Matt got her. Oh man,
39:26
yep, well they were supposed
39:28
to. Oh oh, I gotch she was crippled
39:30
up. Oh god, sorry god,
39:32
HER's not the right word.
39:35
Thank you for the back job,
39:38
Brody.
39:38
Thanks.
39:41
So the question was oh
39:44
from nineteen so nineteen thirty there's around
39:47
nineteen thirty, there's no viable population
39:49
of wolves left in the lower in
39:52
the American West.
39:53
Yeah.
39:53
They even went in the parks with poisons and traps
39:55
and rifles and killed all the wolves inside
39:58
Yellowstone and Glacier and
40:00
all the parks. Yeah, they were pretty well gone. Coyotes
40:03
didn't disappear, but wolves did.
40:05
Why is that white
40:07
coyotes stick around?
40:09
I think because they're smaller, they
40:12
have a higher reproductive capacity, they breed
40:14
more often, they're breeding in smaller
40:16
units, and people weren't so focused
40:19
on eradicating coyotes. You
40:21
know, you see a wolf, by god, we've got to
40:23
kill every last one coyote like well whatever,
40:26
it just not doesn't it generate the emotional
40:28
impact of hatred?
40:30
Gotcha?
40:31
What about Mexican gray wolves?
40:32
Were they always?
40:33
Were there always some north of the border or had
40:35
they been eliminated?
40:38
Also?
40:38
It's interesting, so the Mexican wolves
40:41
were basically eliminated except
40:43
in Mexico, and there were a few into
40:46
the southwest, Arizona and New
40:49
Mexico right at the border area. They
40:51
captured every last one. Then they could fund
40:53
find out of the wild. Roy McBride
40:56
went there and I think the last wild capture
40:58
was about nineteen seventy early
41:00
ninety seventies, and they
41:02
moved them into captive breeding facilities
41:05
to help build up the species,
41:07
but their founding population was
41:10
seven. There's
41:12
a lot of genetic concerns obviously
41:14
with a bottleneck of seven. So
41:17
they're always managing and manipulating them
41:19
to try and maximize genetic diversity,
41:21
including taking pups from captivity
41:24
at a young age and then
41:26
finding a den in the wild
41:28
where the mothers got wild pups, and they'll
41:30
go sneak a couple of the captive
41:32
pups like ten days old. However, really
41:34
and with a while once because that has
41:36
the desirable genetics.
41:38
Yeah, I mean, what's that bird? Does that?
41:41
A coward?
41:41
Right?
41:43
They call them a parasite though, instead of an improvement.
41:45
Okay, so
41:49
yeah, So.
41:49
The Mexican wolf, they were pretty well
41:52
gone. And interestingly, one of my first years
41:54
in the Northwark I think it was nineteen eighty, Chuck Johnkle
41:56
brought up a Mexican carnivore
41:59
biologist, Pepe Trevino, and
42:01
he showed me a polar eight you know, photograph
42:04
he brought up of a wolf. It was like in
42:06
a barn or a shed, and he said,
42:08
is that a wolf? Well, yeah, he says, and
42:11
I know it's a wild one because this
42:13
is a Mexican wolf from the Chiuaua area
42:16
of Mexico and it was coming
42:18
to a ranch and it was a
42:20
male wolf and it was bringing deer
42:22
legs and meat to the ranch
42:25
dog, who was a female on spade
42:27
because it was the last mate choice out
42:29
there, and they ended up the rancher
42:32
could have just killed it, everybody did, but he didn't.
42:34
He called some authority said if you don't come take this wolf
42:36
away, we're going to kill it. So they went and captured
42:39
it and held it in his barn until they moved it to
42:41
the zoo. But it's kind of a sad story,
42:44
yeah, the very last one.
42:46
Yeah. But we played
42:48
this on this podcast
42:51
some time ago and it was
42:54
some bird from was I think of some bird
42:56
from Hawaii and
42:59
it was the I
43:01
can't remember some bird species and it was just
43:03
down to one. It was down to a male or a female
43:06
and this bird species with duet
43:10
I heard it. Yeah, And so they
43:12
have this recording of the last
43:15
bird. Let's say it was a male, the
43:18
last male of the species doing the
43:20
duet without his without accompaniment,
43:23
because he like does his part and you wait and
43:25
the female supposed to Yeah,
43:27
and it was gone.
43:28
I heard that.
43:28
It's kind of terrors at you a little bit.
43:30
Yeah.
43:30
Yeah.
43:33
Have you ever heard a guy named Frank Glazer.
43:36
Old Pilot, different guy
43:38
Don, that was Don Glazier, No, I haven't.
43:40
He has a book
43:42
called Alaska's Well, there's a book about him called
43:44
Alaska's Wolfman, huh.
43:46
And he had gone up to He
43:49
gone out to Alaska very early and was a market
43:51
hunter for people building roads and people
43:53
building railroads and whatever, and eventually
43:56
just became this very accomplished
43:59
hunter. And at the time they were
44:01
trying to get they were
44:03
trying to do economic improvement for
44:06
Eskimo groups in northwest
44:09
Alaska, and part of this economic
44:11
improvement plan was to introduce reindeer
44:14
herding, which never never
44:16
really took so
44:19
as they were trying to go into
44:21
Eskimo communities and the fads
44:24
are trying to get Eskimo
44:26
communities establish
44:29
raindeer populations, but they're having the hell of the time
44:31
with wolves, and so Frank
44:34
Glazer, in addition to
44:36
a lot of aerial gunning, was
44:39
doing bait operations
44:43
and he would go into an area
44:45
and get them poison bait yep, strict
44:48
nine. He'd be able to go get them
44:50
all.
44:51
Yes.
44:51
In his book he talks a lot about all the other stuff that would
44:53
turn up at the bait pile,
44:56
a lot of stuff, but it was so affect that he doesn't
44:58
talk about its effectiveness with pois in this
45:00
way, but it was so effective.
45:03
He has some anecdotes in there where he gets them all
45:06
and then someone will say,
45:08
there's this part of it where an Eskimo tells him
45:10
that he saw it's like seven come across
45:13
the ice and it was like six
45:15
white wolves and a black wolf. And
45:17
a couple days later he goes to his bait pile. There's
45:21
six white wolves and a black wolf at the bait
45:23
pile. Just very effective, yes, yeah,
45:26
And even talked about you want to set it on a
45:28
high knob like he's got like he
45:30
took like a real approach to it, you
45:33
know, like he was good at
45:35
poison and wolves.
45:36
He's a good predator, good at poison
45:39
wolf.
45:39
Yeah, yeah, well, I mean poisonous.
45:41
How they wiped the wolves out of the West. It wasn't
45:43
so much traps and guns it was poison. How
45:46
else are you going to get every last one? That's
45:49
it?
45:49
Yeah, when
45:52
they started coming down, what eventually
45:54
what factors eventually led them to you
45:58
know what, what factors led them to kind of get
46:00
a toe hold? Was it ESA protection
46:02
where you were where people were more
46:05
afraid to shoot them because they'd get in a bunch of trouble.
46:08
Yeah, I think I mean Rachel Carson
46:10
and you know, the whole wave of ecology
46:13
and being environmentally a where it started in the late
46:15
sixties, and then the ESA came about, the
46:17
Act came out seventy three, I think
46:19
the final version. Wolves were protected in seventy
46:22
four, and there was just a little
46:24
change of mindset. And the interesting thing
46:26
was that they would find the north
46:28
Fork of the Flathead, you know, right along glacier.
46:30
Because back in the seventies, people
46:33
like myself and other people, they just wanted
46:35
to move to a quiet place where there were a few people
46:38
and could enjoy wildlife and have a simpler life. They
46:40
weren't laggers or hunters
46:42
or ranchers. Well, there were some, there were some, but
46:44
mostly just sort of go back to earthers
46:46
and have a better quality life. So they didn't
46:49
mind wolves, and these wolves happened to find
46:51
that valley, that corridor of
46:53
tolerance, and they that's how
46:55
they found their way. They didn't work on the Rocky
46:57
mount Front, it didn't work in eastern montann
47:00
it didn't work.
47:00
And I know because of cattle, yes.
47:03
And so they found this little zone and they
47:05
were able to one came, and then
47:08
two years later her male came
47:10
and they made it. And then more wolves come
47:12
down. But it was the tolerance of
47:14
the local community that found wolves interesting
47:17
and novel versus dangerous
47:19
and threatening.
47:20
Where were you? Then?
47:21
I came to that valley in nineteen seventy
47:24
nine, the first wolf that survived
47:26
that we got a radio collar on Kishnina. She
47:29
arrived in nineteen the
47:31
fall of seventy eight. We put
47:33
a radio collar in April fourth, nineteen seventy
47:35
nine, and I trapped there for
47:38
forever, just trying to catch more wolves. And there
47:40
weren't other wolves until about two
47:42
years later when this male came down
47:44
and joined her. But the meantime, you
47:46
know, she wanted her out looking for a female
47:49
like that poor bird in the wale. Yeah, looking
47:51
for a male, right, And eventually
47:53
found one and they made it and had
47:56
the pops and so forth. So that process
47:58
just they filtered on
48:01
their own four paws without any
48:03
assistance whatsoever, and no fanfare and
48:05
no people from Washington,
48:07
d C. Carrying crates and they just they
48:09
just walk down. And I think that's why they
48:11
made it there was just socially
48:13
acceptable and tolerant because it wasn't
48:16
forced on anybody.
48:18
You tell that story in your book. Yeah, how
48:20
did you get a collar on that? Or was it collers
48:22
at the time or so.
48:23
The British Columbia Barry
48:26
researcher Bruce McLellan's been up
48:28
doing embarrassed. He's now retired, but he
48:30
saw the wolves and wolf tracks and he contacted
48:32
Bob Riem at the university and Bob
48:36
hired a wolf trapper from Minnesota, Joe
48:38
Smith. Uncommon name, but it was Joe Smith.
48:41
And he came out and set
48:43
traps and caught that wolf. And then I
48:45
came out in September to replace
48:49
the crew that was there and follow her, and I
48:51
was a trapper and to try and catch more wolves.
48:54
And that's kind of how it started. So she
48:56
was already collared, although I know some there
48:58
had one neighbor who didn't really
49:01
like wolves and said that I brought the wolf with me,
49:03
which you know, or
49:05
that a sled dog got loose but
49:08
slid. You know, you don't see sled dogs that are
49:10
three feet off the shoulder with yellow eyes.
49:11
I mean, it's just all the stuff.
49:13
But that was how they got there.
49:15
They walked and she had to come along ways because
49:17
they poisoned off wolves in southern
49:19
BC and Alberta in the
49:22
rockies, just like they did in the States,
49:24
because they were afraid of rabies. And they started poisoning
49:26
wolves in the sixties, late sixties, and
49:28
so.
49:28
There was a zone they were at it late.
49:30
Yeah, there was a.
49:31
Zone when there weren't wolves along the border. There
49:33
weren't wolves in Waterton and vanmf. So this first
49:35
wolf, Chrishtina, may have come from as far as
49:38
Josper, but she came quite a ways. We
49:40
didn't have genetic resources
49:42
back then to determine where she came from.
49:44
Of course now we could if we'd had a sample, but we
49:46
don't have a sample.
49:50
Did you when you say
49:52
you were a wolf trapper, then were you
49:54
trapping problem
49:56
wolves too?
49:59
Yes? No,
50:01
I don't mind at all when I.
50:03
So or whatever word you want to.
50:05
Do well, you'll enjoy the chapter north
50:07
Holm in the book, but did you like the North Holme chapter?
50:10
So I started working with
50:12
wolves as a sty eyed, waistlink
50:14
blonde haired hippie wolf hugging lady
50:17
and I.
50:18
Came from Niver want me through that descriptor
50:20
now story.
50:24
I was a bit enamored
50:26
with wolves. I was a university college student
50:29
Dave Meach, who's like the wolf god. He's
50:31
still working full time at eighty six studying
50:33
wolves. He's published more scientific
50:36
papers than anybody I know. Anyway, I got
50:38
to work on his captive project and
50:40
then I got to go to northern Minnesota and work, and
50:42
I learned how to catch and collar wolves and track
50:44
them. And then I was hired
50:46
as a year after this, so I'm pretty early
50:49
in my career. In nineteen seventy nine, I was hired
50:51
as a livestock depredation
50:53
control trapper and research trapper.
50:56
So when there weren't wolves
50:58
killing livestock, I went out and form and
51:00
collared wolves that were just wild and added to
51:02
the database for stie Fritz was post
51:04
docking PhD stuff. So my job
51:08
picture you live in North Holme. Picture, you're
51:10
a conservative guy from Michigan with
51:12
a few cows and you have a few acres and
51:14
some young blonde galoy's going
51:16
to come up and save you from.
51:18
The wolves, right.
51:19
I mean it was a hard roto. So
51:23
that was my job and I
51:26
learned so much that summer. It was so
51:28
important to my career development
51:30
and having me be in the middle finger as you described,
51:33
of behavior of
51:36
public wolves reaction
51:38
on my part. So there were truly
51:41
farmers, they don't call them Rochester farmers
51:43
that had chronic depredation problems and there were some
51:45
farmers that had none. I worked with both,
51:48
but getting into that community was
51:51
real challenging, and I
51:54
could tell stories forever about that.
51:57
How would you generally handle those situations?
52:00
Okay, example, I try to use
52:02
there's no point in feeding them a lot
52:04
of scientific data.
52:07
They don't care. You just have to work with
52:09
them and develop a relationship. I use my
52:11
sense of humor. There was like, for example,
52:13
I was working in there and I
52:15
kind of stayed on my own and I tried to stay
52:17
away from people, just do my job because
52:20
I was young in inexperience and I kind of didn't
52:22
want them to know that.
52:23
Right.
52:24
Well, one day I'm at the gas station that a
52:26
guy pumping gas. They've actually pumped your
52:28
gas back. Then says, you know, you got to pick
52:31
up the local paper and see what Bing wrote
52:33
about you. I said, well, who's Bing girl.
52:36
He's what he's like close to
52:38
God. He writes our local news column
52:40
and the weekly paper, and he knows all the goings
52:42
on. So I go buy the paper
52:44
and I open it up and there's
52:47
being being Elhard's column
52:49
and he talks about who visited who and what they
52:51
were having the church bazaar at and then he says,
52:53
and by the way, we have a
52:56
new community member. There's
52:58
an attractive, young blonde lady
53:00
wolf Trapper. And
53:03
next exact quote and next
53:05
to his words, he had
53:08
a photograph of a six foot
53:10
tall cardboard cut out wolf
53:12
and he's got his arm around it and is sitting outside
53:15
at his house and he says, Lady wolf
53:17
Trapper, I have a problem. Wolf's
53:21
like, what do you do?
53:22
Right?
53:22
I'm twenty four years old. I'm like, oh my God,
53:25
and knowing that how I deal with this
53:27
guy is going to make or break my summer.
53:29
So I thought about it really hard. I
53:33
went home. I mate took out a bunch of cardboard
53:35
and tools, and I built a
53:37
perfect replica of a nun
53:40
fourteen new house wolf trap,
53:42
complete with double long springs made out
53:44
of cardboard and a fake chain made like your kids
53:47
make the Christmas loop chains. And I wrapped
53:49
it in black electric tape so it looked like it had been
53:51
dyed black like a real trap. And I got
53:53
a jar of my stinkiest wolf bait and I crammed
53:55
it full of cardboard. I drive to
53:57
his house the next day and I pulled up
54:00
in the government truck and he comes out in
54:02
his porch and he kind of stands there it smirks,
54:04
and he crosses his arm and says,
54:06
well, you must be the lady wolf trapper.
54:09
And I said, yes, sir, I am. Please meet
54:11
you. I'm Diane Boyd. And he says, say
54:13
you get to take care of my problem wolf. I
54:16
said, I am. And I walk around the back of my truck
54:18
and I pull out this cardboard trap
54:21
and the corrugated cardboard stinky goo.
54:23
And I walk over and I say, so
54:25
this this trap, in this bait,
54:28
will I guarantee we will catch
54:30
yours particular subspecies of wolf
54:32
that's causing you your problem. And I reach
54:34
out with it like this, and he stands
54:37
there and he looks at me like for Mediani
54:39
five feet away, and
54:41
he just kind of stands there, and then finally he
54:43
breaks. Soon his granny comes over and he puts
54:46
his hand on my shoulder, says, come on in. The
54:48
wife just took a pie out of the oven, and
54:51
I sat there and had blueberry pie
54:54
with him and tea and coffee,
54:56
and we chatted quite a bit. And the next
54:58
week in his column put a photograph
55:01
of my trap and he said, the
55:03
lady Trapper come paid me a visit, and
55:05
my problems taken care of. And you know what, he
55:07
actually said some nice things about me in his
55:09
column. With the rest of the summer, when I'd catch a wolf, he'd
55:12
put it in the column. And so it's
55:14
like, that's how I work in the community. You can't
55:16
fight it. Just put
55:18
your head down, think hard, and move forward
55:21
and try and do something a little creative. Just
55:23
you asked. That's just one of the stories.
55:25
But yeah, that's good career advice
55:27
for everybody.
55:29
Just be a pain in the neck.
55:33
When that was happening and the wolves were coming
55:36
down, Let's talk about that scenario
55:38
that you said. You know, we might have
55:40
eventually landed where we landed.
55:42
There's no way it would have been the same timeline.
55:44
Right, Probably not, But you
55:46
know, once so once
55:48
we had our first wolf in seventy nine. By
55:51
nineteen ninety five without any reintroductions,
55:54
just simply not trapping, poisoning and shooting
55:56
them. By nineteen ninety five,
55:59
just before the post wolves in the Yellowstone
56:01
in central Idol, we had seventy seventy
56:03
five wolves in eight packs with nobody
56:05
reintroducing them. Doc northwest
56:08
Montana Marion nine
56:10
mile callous spell all through
56:12
northwestern and western Montana.
56:15
The Marian wolves became famous because they started
56:18
killing livestock in the It
56:20
was about late late eighties, so they
56:23
were there and because nobody
56:26
forced them out, they were just kind of existing.
56:28
In those wolves that cause problems, you know,
56:30
shoot shovels shot up, and the other ones kind
56:32
of left to be. So in
56:34
the nineties there were wolves dispersing.
56:37
One of my telling those numbers again, so
56:39
the number of wolves, yeah, pre reintroduction.
56:42
So by nineteen ninety five there
56:44
were about seventy to seventy five wolves in Montana
56:47
in eight packs. And if you go back to the old
56:49
US fish and Wilife Service website.
56:51
You can find the data there. It's published. I'm not making
56:53
this up. I mean I don't. I only
56:56
talk truth and my book is Stories
56:58
of Truth. So they were there.
57:00
They had collars on. Sometimes this
57:02
one pack was giving a guy at livestock
57:05
producer problems, but mostly they were
57:07
just making a living. There were wolves on the Rocky Mountain
57:09
front. They were moving down
57:12
and they were as far as Missoula, the Nine Mile
57:14
Wolves, I'm sure you heard of them. So
57:16
the wolves before they were introduced
57:18
them to Yellowstone, there were two wolves
57:21
that had gotten there already pre nineteen
57:23
ninety five. One was shot
57:25
just south of Fox.
57:27
Creek fire you had gotten a Yellowstone.
57:29
Yeah, and one was filmed, yes, So that was
57:31
like nineteen ninety one ninety two. So
57:34
it's just like Colorado. Those wolves
57:36
came from Wyoming and Colorado
57:38
now and they found their way down
57:41
and they began reproducing, and
57:43
then the reintroduction happed on top of it, which
57:45
is what happened with Wyoming. With a
57:48
Yellowstone in central Idahole. So the wolves
57:50
were starting to get down and the reintroduction
57:52
happened on top of them. But the two that were seeing
57:56
didn't survive long enough to reproduce. They weren't
57:58
viable, they didn't have packs. They were just sort
58:00
of passing through, just like we saw in Montana
58:03
a lot prior to Kishnina
58:05
and the successful breeding.
58:09
Uh, it's gonna sound like a
58:11
dumb question because I know it's probably
58:13
not too challenging, but uh,
58:16
when they kill Kyle's what when they kill Kyle's
58:18
how do they generally approach it?
58:21
You mean domestic cattle, not Kyle.
58:23
Sorry, yeah, kill cattle.
58:25
It depends on how many wolves are, depends
58:27
on the experience of the wolves. But in every kill
58:29
is different. I just remember in Minnesota I had to go skin
58:32
a lot of really disgusting, maggotty carcasses
58:34
of cows and haffers. If it's a calf,
58:36
they basically eat at all, so there's not much
58:38
to fined. You might find an ear tag
58:40
in a pile of scat or something, it's
58:43
hard to prove they were there. But
58:45
the big cole, you find bites. They're
58:48
pretty effective predators. It again,
58:51
the hind, the belly,
58:54
the neck. Sometimes they're not.
58:57
They're not efficient killers
58:59
like lions. I mean lions live
59:01
alone because they can kill an Alkalholm. A wolf
59:03
pack needs other members because they don't have
59:06
fit sabers on four pods to help them
59:08
hold and contain their prey. They just have teeth.
59:11
Do they key in on calving
59:14
season for cattle?
59:15
I have always wondered why they don't more? I
59:17
mean they can, yeah,
59:20
because.
59:20
It seemed like those wolves that were reintroduced
59:22
in Colorado. Yeah, just this past
59:25
Calvia, they really that's when they really
59:27
started to get in some trouble.
59:29
Yes, and those wolves
59:32
before they were transplanted,
59:34
they were livestock killers. So yeah,
59:37
if there's calves around and cattle
59:40
wolves, you will know there are wolves
59:42
there. If you know, if you're gonna have problems, you have
59:44
them. But not every wolf is a livestock
59:47
killer. And sometimes they might
59:49
kill a calf or two and never have a problem.
59:51
Sometimes they might come in and kill repeatedly
59:53
until you remove the wolves. It really depends
59:55
on the situation, and it kind of depends on
59:57
how their ranchers managing
1:00:00
their livestock herd. Do they ever heard or out there?
1:00:02
Do they have guard dogs? Are they turned out
1:00:04
in a national forest and a grazing lease in
1:00:06
May and then they're not picked up till October nobody
1:00:09
looks at them. I mean, you know, it really
1:00:11
depends on the management of the stock a lot.
1:00:15
Uh. You just said something
1:00:17
that I can't
1:00:19
remember with the hell you're talking about,
1:00:23
but it caught my attention. Oh,
1:00:25
I know, can can one
1:00:28
I guess what I was kind of getting at. Can
1:00:30
one do it effectively?
1:00:33
Depends and if you're talking or can they kill it one
1:00:35
adult? Coll effect?
1:00:36
Can one wolf kill one adult kyle? Do you ever see?
1:00:38
That'd be tough. The kyle would probably have to
1:00:40
have something wrong with it, but it's
1:00:42
usually more than one.
1:00:44
And then you just get a hold of it and hang on to it.
1:00:46
Basically.
1:00:47
Yeah.
1:00:48
Yeah, When did.
1:00:50
You say that Colorado put in known livestock
1:00:52
killers. Yeah, explain
1:00:56
what that means. And if that's like you're not in
1:00:58
your head that is that behavior?
1:01:00
Do you feel like it's
1:01:02
hard to unlearn that?
1:01:03
What I would say is, if I wanted to reintroduce
1:01:05
wolves with minimal problems, I would see
1:01:09
wolves that have only had wild meat.
1:01:11
It's like the wolves that were introduced to Yellowstone
1:01:14
and Central Idaho were taken from Canada where
1:01:16
they had never been exposed to livestock,
1:01:18
but they had never been exposed to buffalo either.
1:01:21
I mean, they're pretty good at killing bison now they
1:01:23
had to learn it because they're very formidable.
1:01:25
I wouldn't want to try and kill a bison with my teeth.
1:01:28
But so I think
1:01:31
I don't know all the background and why they
1:01:33
chose those wolves. They probably had a shortage
1:01:35
supplies and a shortage of time
1:01:38
to get the job done, and they had this opportunity
1:01:40
to get those wolves. They weren't all livestock
1:01:43
killers, but the ones that are causing the
1:01:45
problem now had a history before
1:01:47
they were put there.
1:01:50
What is the I'm a little I
1:01:52
haven't followed it as closely. What
1:01:55
is going on with the ones they put in Colorado?
1:01:57
Like, how has that gone? How many and what are they
1:01:59
doing?
1:01:59
Oh boy, it's a big exact numbers. I
1:02:01
couldn't tell you. I'm not that involved. But there's
1:02:03
a male I forgot
1:02:06
his number. They put him in and he's paired
1:02:08
with a female. They had at least one pup,
1:02:10
and I saw on my news fees this morning they've seen
1:02:12
three, now three pups
1:02:14
in this particular pack, but they had only documented
1:02:17
one up until yesterday or whatever. And
1:02:19
they were put in at the end of the year,
1:02:22
like December or so, and they
1:02:24
started killing livestock in April.
1:02:26
I believe it was when the pups were born. And
1:02:29
they're now
1:02:31
debating how are they going to manage the situation.
1:02:34
They no matter what CPW
1:02:36
does, they aren't be a happy,
1:02:38
winning outcome, because if they remove
1:02:40
all the wolves and kill them all, you're gonna have the
1:02:43
wolf protectionists screaming
1:02:45
at him. If they don't do anything, they're gonna
1:02:47
have the livestock growers scream at him if they take
1:02:50
I actually had this conversation with the journalist yesterday.
1:02:53
He says, well, how about if we just take one,
1:02:56
say we know the male has been a livestock
1:02:58
killer, can the female survive
1:03:01
long and protect and feed those
1:03:03
pups without help? And
1:03:06
I said, well, I can give you two examples. In
1:03:08
nineteen eighty two, when Kishnina
1:03:10
had her first litter of pups in the Flathead in
1:03:12
fifty years, her
1:03:15
mate was killed in June and those pups were
1:03:18
seven eight weeks old, and he
1:03:21
was killed accidentally by the Grizzly bear
1:03:24
trap people. She was caught in a Grizzly
1:03:26
bersonaire and he subsequently
1:03:28
died accidental
1:03:31
death and still just as dead
1:03:33
though, so the female had Yeah, so
1:03:36
doesn't him. It's kind of like got
1:03:38
your dog right. Anyway, the
1:03:40
female had seven pups to deal with,
1:03:42
and he raised kids, and you raised
1:03:46
dogs. You know how much food they start to
1:03:48
consume as they become teenagers. Oh my god,
1:03:50
talk about a full time job trying to feed seven
1:03:53
growing pups that are fifty sixty pounds by
1:03:55
fall, and I thought they're not can never make
1:03:57
it. They all made it through winter. We
1:04:00
were seeing tracks of eight wolves
1:04:02
in the snow. So there's one example.
1:04:04
The other example was so that was keeping
1:04:07
the female remaining. And then in the nine Mile
1:04:09
in the early recolonization, those
1:04:11
wolves got to nine Mile, Montana on their own
1:04:14
near Missoula. The male and female
1:04:16
had pups. The mother was poached
1:04:18
over Memorial Day, which is pretty early. So
1:04:20
those little guys were maybe
1:04:23
four maybe five weeks old. They
1:04:25
were probably still drinking milk from mom, but
1:04:27
they already had getting regurgitated food certainly,
1:04:30
so it only had the male to raise the whole litter of
1:04:32
pops. And Mike and Mannis
1:04:35
who was studying him at that time, and Barto,
1:04:37
Gary University, do you know, bloody bart
1:04:39
Barto Gary.
1:04:41
He's passed now, but he was the
1:04:43
most vary, the most voracious
1:04:46
hunter right now.
1:04:46
We loved him. He's a university exactly.
1:04:48
We call him Bloody Bart.
1:04:50
I can tell you stories.
1:04:51
He whatever he shot, he would kill. So he had
1:04:53
the had permission to go shoot
1:04:55
deer or pick up roadkill to supplemently
1:04:58
feed those pups because they were fully
1:05:00
in danger. This would be like nineteen eighty eight
1:05:02
or so to do anything fishing.
1:05:04
Walley Service was mandated under
1:05:07
the essay to do what they could to keep
1:05:09
them alive as an endangered species. So they got
1:05:11
these permits to go do that. That
1:05:13
male raise those pups without a female,
1:05:15
and they all survived. So yes, the wolves
1:05:18
are incredibly resilient. So then
1:05:20
this journalist asked me yesterday, so should
1:05:22
they take the male or the female? I'm like, oh
1:05:24
my god, you're asking me a Sophie's choice
1:05:27
question.
1:05:27
I can't tell you.
1:05:30
And you know, we talked about it at
1:05:32
length. And starting with two
1:05:35
wolves adults that have both been killing
1:05:37
livestock, and then you're going to take one
1:05:39
wolf away to try
1:05:41
and hopefully minimize it, you might be
1:05:43
causing more of a problem because the remaining
1:05:46
parent now has the burden
1:05:48
solely of feeding hungry pops,
1:05:50
and maybe it's going to kill more livestock
1:05:52
because of that.
1:05:53
And those pups are going to learn to do it too.
1:05:55
Yeah, this is the problem. So it's I
1:05:58
just think maybe thinking
1:06:01
ahead a little bit ahead
1:06:03
of time may have headed
1:06:06
this problem off. But it's amazing to me that
1:06:08
all those wolves they put out, they only had one
1:06:10
reproducing pack. You think they would have had
1:06:12
more. But this is a problem.
1:06:14
How many did they put down?
1:06:15
Ten total? I think?
1:06:17
And then are all ten still alive?
1:06:19
One of them got killed by a mountain lion, which is
1:06:21
kind of ironic. It's usually the.
1:06:23
Other way around.
1:06:24
Yeah, yeah, but I'm not there
1:06:26
may have been another one that died
1:06:28
somehow.
1:06:29
The mountain lion got one. I think I knew that.
1:06:31
Maybe I forgot it, but I think most of them are
1:06:34
still.
1:06:34
There, and they formed one reproducing pack.
1:06:36
Yeah, it's surprising to me because they did it
1:06:39
before breeding season and then they'll be reintroducing
1:06:41
more wolves. And of course you heard Washington State
1:06:44
is now refusing to give them more wolves. It's becoming
1:06:46
this huge political.
1:06:48
But they got I thought they got him from the nets person there.
1:06:50
They got him from Oregon originally
1:06:53
and one of the well not the state, might have been
1:06:55
the nests person that originally said yes,
1:06:57
we'll contribute to but that just got
1:07:00
They just said we're not doing it
1:07:02
right.
1:07:04
One they had from Oregon, I
1:07:06
think state in the state, but
1:07:09
I wasn't the new ones. Weren't they going to get
1:07:11
the next batch from Washington? Wasn't it was?
1:07:14
I think it was it was a tribe
1:07:17
where that whoever it was, just
1:07:19
said Nope, we're out.
1:07:21
We're not doing What is the argument to not
1:07:23
let them have them?
1:07:25
Politics?
1:07:25
I'm sure explain the politics. You
1:07:32
know it's politics, but you don't know what.
1:07:35
She doesn't study politics.
1:07:38
So I'm just saying every decision made about
1:07:40
wolves is based on politics. It's not
1:07:43
based on biology.
1:07:44
So why of
1:07:46
course, because biology is
1:07:49
largely politics. When
1:07:51
people say like I don't want to be political or everything's.
1:07:54
Political, everything is political.
1:07:56
There's nothing that's not political, right,
1:07:59
I mean every decision is political. I know,
1:08:01
creating national Force was intensely political.
1:08:04
Yeah, Like, what's not political?
1:08:08
I mean most actions are taken by elected
1:08:10
representatives in this country or
1:08:12
appointed appointed
1:08:14
by elected.
1:08:16
Everything is I know, we
1:08:18
don't have to go there.
1:08:20
No I mean, but it's like I don't like earlier, I had
1:08:22
a headache and I took two ivy profen that
1:08:24
are like two hundred and fifty milligram ibuprofene.
1:08:26
The fact that you can go by two hundred fifty
1:08:28
gram milligram ivy profen
1:08:30
is I don't know the history on it. That's probably
1:08:32
political, Oh, no, doubt.
1:08:36
So I would guess because there's I would
1:08:38
guess that because the Colorado
1:08:40
reintroduction has had a lot
1:08:42
of problems.
1:08:43
The Native Americans say yeah, I'm
1:08:45
sorry, and.
1:08:45
The Native Americans are probably saying, you know, we just
1:08:48
don't want to deal with it. So I wrote
1:08:50
A I was telling you honest. I wrote A was
1:08:52
asked to write a document for the National Walley
1:08:54
Federation about
1:08:57
Wolve's returning to Colorado. And it's basically
1:08:59
called less and is learned from everywhere else for
1:09:02
the Colorado can use as a base
1:09:04
as a template for reintroductions, and
1:09:07
sixty pages long. It's on It's
1:09:09
on the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website.
1:09:11
Is that in a in your book?
1:09:13
No, No, it's not.
1:09:16
It's stabled into the end of your book.
1:09:17
No.
1:09:18
Maybe you can read the audio version of that when.
1:09:22
God anyway, it
1:09:24
laid out all of the problems that challenges
1:09:27
people have had elsewhere where the wolves are
1:09:29
coming back on their own or reintroduced,
1:09:31
How agencies federal and state dealt
1:09:33
with them, how local communities dealt with them,
1:09:36
how conservation groups and
1:09:38
and uh a DC or
1:09:40
animal it's no longer that. Now it's wildlife
1:09:42
services work together sometimes
1:09:45
or not. Just all these things. There's
1:09:47
a template. There's nothing that needs to be
1:09:49
reinvented about wolves being on the landscape.
1:09:52
It's it's old hat.
1:09:54
So this is pretty interesting. The Colorado
1:09:56
things, Yeah, the
1:09:58
they were going to get them from the Colville Nation fifteen
1:10:01
of the moment, that's Washington, Washington. The
1:10:03
Colville Nation said no because
1:10:06
Colorado Parks and Wildlife wouldn't
1:10:08
agree to give the Southern You Tribe
1:10:12
like management over wolves
1:10:14
on the Southern You tribes.
1:10:16
Oh, political
1:10:18
out of tribal solid area.
1:10:21
That that's an interesting point. Thank you for
1:10:23
clear that clarification. I knew it had something to
1:10:25
do with people, and I knew it wasn't.
1:10:27
Yeah, I bet it had
1:10:29
something to do always.
1:10:34
I want to get back into some of this. I want to ask you another
1:10:36
question that that Karin highlighted, it's
1:10:39
a good one. Uh, you're
1:10:42
familiar with the like with
1:10:44
grizzly bears, you're from with the distinct population
1:10:47
segments. Okay, that there's so they
1:10:49
it's kind of like looking at part
1:10:52
of this whole idea is with grizzly
1:10:54
bears is being like, Okay, when we're talking about grizzly
1:10:56
bears being on the landscape,
1:10:59
where could they actually be?
1:11:02
Like what areas could actually support bears?
1:11:04
Right?
1:11:05
I mean ecologically?
1:11:06
Yeah, yeah, I mean there's a handful of everythings. But
1:11:08
I was gonna bring up that there's a there's a distinct population
1:11:11
segment that doesn't have bears, but it
1:11:13
could where
1:11:15
it's.
1:11:16
The bitter Well
1:11:18
they've taken getting there.
1:11:20
Yeah, they're getting there.
1:11:22
And there was at a time there's talk of putting them there.
1:11:24
Yes, Okay, so if
1:11:28
you were gonna
1:11:33
maybe I set that up the wrong way. Let me just let me skip
1:11:35
all that crap about the DPS.
1:11:36
Okay, if if
1:11:38
you were going to make a map, if you were going to
1:11:40
make a map of
1:11:44
the United States, all
1:11:47
of it, Okay, and
1:11:50
and I said, uh, Diane, go in
1:11:52
and and and color
1:11:55
in the areas where
1:11:57
you think there's
1:11:59
a chance of having
1:12:02
viable wolf populations,
1:12:04
meaning there's enough habitat,
1:12:09
enough wild food, low
1:12:11
enough chance of intense friction.
1:12:15
Right, how would you start to color that
1:12:17
map?
1:12:18
Well, the last qualifier just put on is
1:12:20
the deciding factor for everything. I mean there's oh
1:12:23
god, yeah, I mean so historically
1:12:27
wolves had the widest distribution of any
1:12:29
mammal in the world except for humans. I
1:12:31
mean they live from the Arctic to
1:12:33
the desert. They live in every biome,
1:12:35
every habitat. They can eat anything
1:12:38
their habitat. Journalists, they're
1:12:40
food generalists. They're like a you
1:12:42
know, one hundred pound kayah that way. So
1:12:45
they can live anywhere, I mean they did. I mean
1:12:47
they covered the entire United States, so where
1:12:49
could they live. They would live anywhere
1:12:51
where us humans will tolerate them. And they're trying
1:12:54
to get back. I mean wolves are showing up
1:12:56
in Illinois and Missouri and you
1:12:58
know they just get shot, and
1:13:01
but they would be there. I mean they
1:13:04
would. They would find a way to live
1:13:06
in Central Park if we didn't kill them.
1:13:09
They'd be eating poodles and whatever out there.
1:13:11
But there's not who knows, so squirrels
1:13:13
RFK.
1:13:14
You have to lay it dead one of those, yeah,
1:13:18
on the trail.
1:13:20
So that's a hard question because
1:13:22
they would live everywhere, So we don't
1:13:24
have to color in a map because they just color and everything.
1:13:27
I mean, I get to that last qualifier.
1:13:29
Yeah, then then you have to constrict it. So the wolves
1:13:32
has shown us now in
1:13:34
Montana. Anyway, Let's pick Montana because
1:13:36
they're all sitting here and thinking about Montana. So
1:13:38
wolves basically live in the western one third
1:13:41
or one quarter, and they've been
1:13:43
doing this for decades now
1:13:45
because that's where we tolerate them. But
1:13:48
they keep showing up at Miles City
1:13:50
and I Galaca and they get
1:13:52
shot and they don't make it.
1:13:55
That's not an ecological issue at
1:13:57
all. They would live there. They did, so
1:14:00
I don't know.
1:14:01
Well they did under
1:14:04
different circumstances. Okay, let me let me requalify.
1:14:06
Okay, let me requalify, because it's going to throw
1:14:08
out. Did you say Cleveland earlier? Did I make that up?
1:14:11
I didn't hear Cleveland.
1:14:13
You said something Missouri, she
1:14:15
said, Let me let me
1:14:17
read. Let me read you my qualification and
1:14:20
not live on that. Somehow
1:14:23
we make this deal. Humans
1:14:25
can't kill them, but
1:14:28
they can't eat any human generated
1:14:30
food sources. Cool, now.
1:14:34
Hit me, there
1:14:37
would be nowhere. No,
1:14:39
I'm serious, because the only pack
1:14:41
that I'm aware in Montana
1:14:45
that has never come into contact
1:14:47
with livestock is the
1:14:49
one up in northwest corner Glacia National
1:14:51
Park. And there is livestock in
1:14:53
his southern portion of the Norfolk
1:14:55
or there was Ladenburg sold this stuff. But
1:14:59
other than that, the can always come into contact
1:15:01
with people who are raising sled dugs,
1:15:03
people of lama farms, people of livestock,
1:15:06
chickens, whatever. Just because
1:15:08
we've taken over all the while life.
1:15:10
Happened at could they make a go
1:15:12
of it without causing too much trouble? And like
1:15:14
Maine New Hamps, like the
1:15:16
Upper.
1:15:17
Yeah, I'm not going to give up on this map idea.
1:15:20
I can.
1:15:20
It seems like main they
1:15:23
could. There's certainly plenty of white.
1:15:24
Tails there, right, they'd have to get there.
1:15:27
Yeah, Okay,
1:15:29
stop being so obstructionist. Somebody
1:15:35
you understand what I'm trying to ask.
1:15:37
No, I don't. Actually, I'm not.
1:15:39
Steve coming semi full of wolves
1:15:42
loose and Maine where
1:15:44
can moose?
1:15:44
Okay, let me let me say this. Okay,
1:15:47
I'm not trying to I'm trying to color
1:15:50
in the country of where however you
1:15:52
want to put it? Man, where could you visualize?
1:15:55
Where do you think when the dust
1:15:57
is settled in a hundred years,
1:16:00
And don't don't hit me with like, well, you
1:16:02
know, is there a zombie apocalypse or in
1:16:05
a hundred years? Where are wolves?
1:16:08
If they lived where there weren't human conflicts?
1:16:11
No, no, no, forget all those, OK, meaning
1:16:14
new direction? Yeah, meaning
1:16:16
it appears that it
1:16:18
wound up being that northwest
1:16:21
Montana was a suitable
1:16:23
place for wolves.
1:16:24
Yeah, it is right.
1:16:25
It wound up being that
1:16:27
the northern Great Lakes, Yeah, the
1:16:30
northern third of Minnesota, the northern
1:16:32
third of Wisconsin, the northern
1:16:35
third of Michigan wound up being like a
1:16:37
pretty good like it is from the wolves
1:16:39
perspective, a good place for wolves.
1:16:40
Yeah.
1:16:41
What are the chunks that are probably
1:16:43
like that that don't
1:16:46
yet but could.
1:16:49
It's it's hard to answer because I'm
1:16:52
not Anvoidum. I'm just saying they go everywhere, and
1:16:54
they get shot, they go
1:16:56
to eastern Montana, So I would color in eastern
1:16:58
Montana. They don't make one hundred years
1:17:01
from out, They're not going to make it either.
1:17:02
So I met him.
1:17:03
I'm at a lost kind. I'm not trying to avoid. I'm at
1:17:05
a loss how to answer. They would live in Illinois,
1:17:08
they would live in Missouri because there's plenty of
1:17:10
places where there's enough habitat
1:17:13
for them. They just for habitat all. They needed someplace
1:17:16
where they find large hooftungulates,
1:17:18
they don't get shot by people, and
1:17:21
they have a secure place to raise pups. There's plenty
1:17:23
of places throughout the country
1:17:25
like that.
1:17:26
Do you think we've reached, like
1:17:29
we've filled in the areas that people well,
1:17:32
that people are going to tolerate, Like they're
1:17:34
where they are now, and they're probably not going to
1:17:36
be in a lot of new places.
1:17:38
I disagree.
1:17:39
No, I'm asking like,
1:17:41
like will there like are
1:17:44
they where they are now? And that's probably
1:17:46
all the space.
1:17:47
I think there would be more wolves expanding
1:17:49
across Montana, certainly. I mean they're showing up
1:17:51
in the Snowy's and they're showing up all over
1:17:54
and if they can get a foothold and have a pack,
1:17:56
then at some point, if you're hunting and trapping
1:17:58
them, there always be a few remaining. But
1:18:01
this stronghold is the western portion because
1:18:03
it's mountainous, because they're not seen because there's
1:18:05
less road access, because there's the Bob, the
1:18:07
Glacier Park, to scapegoat wilderness. Those
1:18:10
are all those things that these wolves
1:18:12
need to live. I don't see that. There's
1:18:16
a lot of places that are very wild across
1:18:18
the eastern Montana bird hunt, an lo hunt. But
1:18:21
there's always a conflict there. There
1:18:23
just always is with livestock, with
1:18:26
hunters, with whatever goes on. And
1:18:28
I'd love to hear what you think. So in terms
1:18:30
of mapping, right now, wolves are all the way through
1:18:32
Minnesota. You got wolves around the Twin Cities. Now
1:18:34
you don't know maybe you don't know that, but they're
1:18:37
filling into southern Wisconsin. They are moving
1:18:39
south. It's a really slow wave. Nobody's
1:18:42
reintroducing them. I got to point that out. It's
1:18:44
on their own and they have been making
1:18:46
it to the other states but get killed. So what
1:18:49
because I don't kind of totally maybe get
1:18:51
your question, or maybe I'm less optimistic
1:18:54
than you, where do you see them going
1:18:56
where they aren't? Oh,
1:18:58
Utah would be a place about it.
1:19:00
It's funny you say that. It's funny you say Utah
1:19:02
because I was at an event. I
1:19:06
was at an event this winter and
1:19:08
Utah's governor spoke at the event, and
1:19:11
Utah's governor made a pledge to the audience
1:19:15
that there would be no wolves
1:19:18
in Utah. And I remember
1:19:20
thinking, I don't know that that's your call.
1:19:24
What he mean that
1:19:27
he means.
1:19:30
He was saying and
1:19:32
addressing the audience, which was an
1:19:34
audience of of uh
1:19:38
people that do a lot of work for big game
1:19:40
habitat improvement, right, big
1:19:43
horns, sheet mule deer or whatever, putting
1:19:45
it, putting ungulates on the ground, putting
1:19:47
game animals on the ground. He made
1:19:49
a pledge that there will be no wolves in Utah,
1:19:51
and I remember thinking.
1:19:53
Like, don't worry hunters.
1:19:54
Yeah, but I remember thinking, well, the way it sits
1:19:56
now with federal protection, that's
1:19:59
not really your call. And I don't know what. I appreciate
1:20:02
the sentiment, but I don't know what tools you have at
1:20:04
your disposal.
1:20:05
So I get that what you're saying,
1:20:07
but that agrees with what I say, because
1:20:10
wolves have made it to Utah. And
1:20:12
we had a wolf go from Yellowstone, go
1:20:15
all the way to the Grand Canyon and
1:20:17
started on its way back, a colored wolf from
1:20:19
Wyoming from Yellowstone and they got
1:20:21
shot on the way home. They get shot.
1:20:23
I don't know how to better tell you,
1:20:26
but they just get So maybe.
1:20:27
He said that he was just saying if
1:20:29
they come, we can. Wasn't that he's going to do
1:20:31
something, that's just someone's going to
1:20:33
shoot.
1:20:34
But I think that's what he's writing.
1:20:36
Yeah, people will kill them.
1:20:37
I think what you're saying too, though, is that I
1:20:40
mean there are areas of the country that have
1:20:43
other than Northwest Montana, that have sufficient
1:20:47
habitat security, like
1:20:49
you in a hundred years, you
1:20:52
know, I would imagine all the way
1:20:54
down the spine of.
1:20:55
The Rockies right.
1:20:59
Over maybe the Cascades down
1:21:02
I don't know that they go down the Sierras, you know,
1:21:04
like they have Like that's what.
1:21:05
I question is California. Yeah,
1:21:08
California would be maybe a little more
1:21:10
tolerant. They have they
1:21:12
have six
1:21:14
packs or something.
1:21:16
And if I asked you my question twenty years
1:21:18
ago that you're trying to like dodge and obfuscate,
1:21:20
I'm not if I had asked that question twenty
1:21:22
years ago, would you have said, would you have said Lake
1:21:24
Tahoe.
1:21:27
I think wolves have a good chance of being in
1:21:29
Utah except people kill them. So I don't know if that's
1:21:31
a yes or no, that's a yes, okay, And
1:21:35
I'm really trying to it's not I'm
1:21:37
not squirming, I'm not uncomfortable. I'm just saying
1:21:40
I have lived with wolf killing for
1:21:42
so long, and where they're going to be tolerated
1:21:45
is where they're at. And wolves getting
1:21:47
in California's great, but they're going to start killing
1:21:49
people's pets and they're
1:21:51
going to be not tolerated as
1:21:53
well.
1:21:53
What about like the wolves? If the Colorado
1:21:56
plan goes, is they some people
1:21:58
would like it to go. They're they're gonna
1:22:01
push into New Mexico, Arizonah.
1:22:04
Yeah, So my question is what happens to
1:22:06
those Mexican wolves then?
1:22:07
So I love this question and half
1:22:09
a finger and I will disagree on this.
1:22:11
So okay, can you guys, can one of you make
1:22:13
the question really clear for people? Because I think a lot of people
1:22:15
aren't to understand.
1:22:16
What they're I think she's probably the better.
1:22:18
Yeah, do you mind, like why we're even asking
1:22:20
that? Like what we're talking about.
1:22:21
As I explained about the Mexican wolves there, they
1:22:24
are a unique subspecies. It's the only
1:22:26
population really that's got its separate subspecies
1:22:28
classification for protection other than the
1:22:30
red wolves, which are a different animal. So they
1:22:33
come from a very unique gene
1:22:36
pool of seven founding members.
1:22:38
They're trying to protect that gene pool. So
1:22:40
if you read I mean every time a Mexican wolf
1:22:43
starts to go north, it disperses like
1:22:46
a wolf is gonna do. They live by their
1:22:48
feet and they go north, they go and
1:22:50
catch them and bring them back. They don't allow them.
1:22:53
Oh yeah, they don't allow them
1:22:55
to travel out of the recovery area. What
1:22:58
you could google the on, but they don't
1:23:01
allow it because that
1:23:03
if.
1:23:03
One of the Mexican wolves out of Mexican
1:23:06
Wolf area, they fetch it and bring it home.
1:23:08
Yes, it's a defined zone and
1:23:10
so and so because number
1:23:13
one, that was the promise early on with the plan. But
1:23:15
they've expanded the Mexican Wolf Recovery area
1:23:17
slightly, but they don't want those
1:23:19
wolves to mix with other gene pools.
1:23:22
And those Colorado wolves
1:23:24
will eventually make it down to
1:23:26
four corners and come down and they
1:23:28
will approach and get in. I would soon
1:23:31
get to the Mexican wolf population. And
1:23:33
then what are people going to do. They're going to start killing
1:23:35
one wolf species subspecies to protect
1:23:38
the other one. I think
1:23:40
I mean, you've had some really good genetic
1:23:42
people on your programs. I've so enjoyed their discussions.
1:23:45
If you were trying to preserve a
1:23:47
rare species with a unique genetic
1:23:49
pool that was highly inbred,
1:23:52
like the iroil ones were, and then they
1:23:54
all went to extinction because they were two in bread, wouldn't
1:23:57
you want to have some gene flow from
1:23:59
the most similar population adjoining and bringing
1:24:01
new genes.
1:24:02
Because historically the.
1:24:05
Right but it was it.
1:24:07
But even though there was all connected
1:24:09
all the way to Mexico to Central Mexico, they
1:24:12
were still had unique genetic
1:24:14
markers because they have a different
1:24:16
habitat than the rest of the wolves. It's a different
1:24:18
habitat, so they're been isolated
1:24:21
on their own way. But that's my humble opinion.
1:24:23
I'm a lumper, not a splitter, and I think
1:24:25
it would behoove Mexican wolves
1:24:27
to have some new gene flow. And I am not in
1:24:30
a maybe a majority opinion, but I
1:24:32
think people who have genetics background would
1:24:35
agree it's
1:24:38
going to happen. They won't be able to stop.
1:24:39
It, well, sounds like they will maybe
1:24:42
try.
1:24:42
They will try, They're already trying. They
1:24:44
do move all these wolves back every time
1:24:46
they go out of the.
1:24:47
Rescoveries are they getting them?
1:24:49
They catch them everyone, everyone of them collared.
1:24:51
Just about so they have
1:24:53
no idea.
1:24:54
And also when a wolf is in an area,
1:24:56
you do.
1:24:57
A little baby and like you put the baby in the mill
1:24:59
of room the while it crawls away and you go get
1:25:01
it and set it back. And they thought about it.
1:25:05
Get an invisible.
1:25:06
Fence, right, I mean, that's how we deal with
1:25:08
dogs wondering.
1:25:09
I don't think that would work for them, but anyway,
1:25:12
And when wolves go to an area, they leave
1:25:14
scatt they kill things. People
1:25:16
see them. Everybody's got trail gameras everybody
1:25:18
and the brothers all looking for the biggest delcor water.
1:25:21
You see them, You see him, right, you
1:25:24
know they're there. They're not small and sneaky
1:25:26
like lions. They're just not. They instead
1:25:28
of sneaking around and hiding in a rock crevices,
1:25:30
they come into town in Harley's I mean wolves
1:25:33
animals.
1:25:36
That's a T shirt. That's a T shirt.
1:25:39
There's two I want to talk about, just to give
1:25:41
you a little taste of what's common. I want to
1:25:43
talk about mountain lions, Okay, difference mountains
1:25:45
and wolves. Yep, I
1:25:49
want to talk about why wolves don't kill people.
1:25:52
That's a good one, But
1:25:55
first I.
1:25:55
Want to talk a little bit more about Colorado. Okay,
1:25:58
crystal Ball for me, and you're totally excused,
1:26:01
like like this is just crystal Ball land. This
1:26:03
is if you had to make a guess. Yeah,
1:26:06
what is Give
1:26:09
me a timeframe. What's
1:26:11
going on in twenty years in Colorado? Just take a wild
1:26:14
stab. I'm gonna known. Diane
1:26:16
Boyd is taking a wild
1:26:18
stab. This is not an academic
1:26:21
exercise. She's taking a wild
1:26:23
stab. Twenty years
1:26:25
what's the wolf land? What's the landscape in Colorado?
1:26:28
What's going on?
1:26:29
People will still be fighting where their wolves should
1:26:32
be or should not be there, And despite our human
1:26:34
intentions, they will continue to expand their populations
1:26:37
and fill up appropriate habitat in Colorado,
1:26:39
and they will have to kill some for killing livestock,
1:26:42
and the other ones that aren't killing livestock
1:26:44
will continue to find habitat and reproduce.
1:26:46
And I think there'll be more wolves.
1:26:48
So it'll be Montana twenty years after
1:26:50
nineteen ninety six.
1:26:51
What about the hunting season? You see that happen eventually
1:26:54
hunting for wolves?
1:26:55
Yeah, I think that when you get enough
1:26:57
wolves to create social tolerance. Season
1:27:00
is a good idea. It's probably not
1:27:02
such a good idea for individual wolves,
1:27:04
but in terms of creating tolerance on the
1:27:07
landscape, and I think you have to give
1:27:09
the tools to livestock
1:27:11
producers that they can take
1:27:13
care problems themselves. I mean, that's what they did in Montana
1:27:15
early on. I just say follow the model that
1:27:17
worked in Montana. It's worked pretty
1:27:20
well. I mean we went from one wolf
1:27:22
to you know, thousand wolves pretty quickly.
1:27:24
And then in your crystal Ball can you extend
1:27:26
that crystal Ball scenario to the
1:27:30
Mexican gray wolf. They're all making
1:27:32
love and they're just mixed in together.
1:27:37
Should have hefelfinger here too?
1:27:38
So well, yeah, but this isn't what you
1:27:41
want to have. Yeah,
1:27:43
this is just your guess work.
1:27:44
People will still be fighting over Mexican
1:27:46
wolves, and Mexican wolves
1:27:49
may hit I'm just trying to think, they
1:27:52
may hit a critical mass where
1:27:54
they're not all colored, and then some of them will
1:27:56
escape beyond the the geo
1:27:58
fencing of their their loud
1:28:01
recovery zone and began going elsewhere.
1:28:03
But if they continue to heavily,
1:28:06
heavily handle and manage the wolves
1:28:08
and collar everyone that well,
1:28:10
they're not all collared, but manage its a
1:28:12
significant portion population. It's going to be really
1:28:15
hard for those wolves to sneak through, but that's
1:28:18
going to be And I just think the wolves from the north will
1:28:20
come down and start integrating. I'm
1:28:22
hoping they will. And
1:28:24
I think Mike Phillips would disagree with that too. But
1:28:26
the other people I know, biologists, we talk about this.
1:28:29
It's like, yeah, let them, let them blend,
1:28:31
Let's see what happens. It's sort of like this
1:28:33
this animal of the northeast, the Koi
1:28:36
wolf dog thing. Nobody
1:28:38
really knows what it is, but that animal
1:28:40
has made a really successful living. It's
1:28:42
found a niche that was partially
1:28:45
formed but what we tolerate and how we modified
1:28:47
the landscape, so this animal that lives there now
1:28:49
is doing really well well. Mexican
1:28:52
wolf gray wolf mix probably
1:28:55
be the same way. At least they'll have more genetic variation.
1:28:57
They probably won't go extinct due to inbreeding. Who
1:29:01
knows, but you asked my crystal ball. I
1:29:03
think there would be more wolves. I
1:29:05
think they will fill in more places and
1:29:07
there will always be the battles to
1:29:10
have them on the landscape always.
1:29:12
I feel like, you know how there's sports betting. I
1:29:15
think there should be a way that you could like that we could
1:29:17
run like a bookie thing and
1:29:19
have uh Colorado wolf
1:29:22
betting. H I
1:29:25
mean you got them.
1:29:26
You can bet on anything though, Yeah, I mean I
1:29:29
wouldn't be surprised if you could get odds on
1:29:32
Colorado's wolf population in ten years.
1:29:34
Yeah, and people could make like bets and
1:29:36
you could win money and lose money.
1:29:39
I think to the more the more radical
1:29:42
people get, I think
1:29:45
it will cause more people to feel
1:29:47
sort of moved towards the metal. Like this fellow
1:29:50
over in where was it Daniel Wyoming
1:29:52
who ran over the wolf with the snowmobile
1:29:54
this winter? You must have And he crippled
1:29:56
it so couldn't get away, and then he ties it up and
1:29:59
brings it into a b All of this is
1:30:01
illegal, which is a minor thing, but it's
1:30:03
really immoral. And he brings into a
1:30:05
bar and people are laughing with it and getting their pictures
1:30:07
taken in and finally hauls it out back and shoots it.
1:30:09
Well, that's just one animal, but it had huge
1:30:12
ripples throughout the country, and
1:30:14
that's affecting wolf policy because
1:30:16
of one guy's action. And I think those
1:30:18
people that maybe didn't really care
1:30:20
about wolves or maybe dislike them somewhat
1:30:23
moderately, see that is
1:30:25
that is not fair, Chase, that is
1:30:27
not acceptable to me as a hunter or a
1:30:30
human being, and we have to put
1:30:32
brakes on that. I kind of see the more radical
1:30:35
people get. I'm hoping that people
1:30:37
come to the middle more. That's my hope.
1:30:43
Why don't wolves kill people? Because
1:30:45
they do it Romania, I've wondered that for
1:30:48
a long time.
1:30:48
Well, sometimes come on, So it's
1:30:51
not more common there, No, But
1:30:54
there's all those like crazy old stories about.
1:30:57
That's not None of that's true.
1:30:58
So in my book, I
1:31:00
could read you a little paragraph about statistics,
1:31:02
but do you want me to find
1:31:04
it. I'll have to look for it for a moment when
1:31:07
you're talking. I'll look for it. But wolves
1:31:09
have occasionally killed people in modern
1:31:11
times. Documented Kenton Carnegie
1:31:14
was killed up in northern Saskatchewan and in
1:31:16
the eighties early nineties by
1:31:19
He was at a remote camp and these
1:31:21
wolves were coming into the dump. So think of think dump
1:31:23
bear not afraid of people. And
1:31:25
he went out one evening alone with
1:31:27
his camera and he was found
1:31:30
the next morning, I believe, and he had been killed
1:31:32
and partially consumed, and it appeared to be
1:31:34
wolves. There was wolves and bears both feeding
1:31:36
on him, but it looked like the wounds were wolf
1:31:39
probably, So that's one guy. And then
1:31:42
there was a woman jogger in Alaska who
1:31:44
was jogging and she was attacked members
1:31:46
killed. I don't think she was consumed.
1:31:49
I don't remember on that, but
1:31:51
it was definitely predation they killed her. And
1:31:54
there's been a few, I
1:31:57
guess attacks encounters of
1:31:59
wolves that have been habituated,
1:32:01
especially like on some of
1:32:03
the islands off of British
1:32:05
Columbia and Washington where people kayak
1:32:08
and they're feeding wolves out on the beaches and wolves
1:32:10
get friendly and they come in and bite somebody in their sleeping
1:32:12
bag. Because they don't stuff like that Algonquin
1:32:15
Park habituated
1:32:17
wolves that becomes a problem.
1:32:20
So those are the cases that I know of.
1:32:22
And then Mark mcnae wrote a really
1:32:24
long document published you could google
1:32:26
his name, Mark McNee of all
1:32:28
the wolf encounters that he could find that were verifiable
1:32:32
olden days. A lot
1:32:34
of wolves were rabid. I
1:32:36
mean a lot. I shouldn't say that. A lot
1:32:39
of the encounters with wolves that had
1:32:41
bitten were rabbid. Okay, that happens with every
1:32:43
species, bats, foxes, it doesn't matter.
1:32:45
But if you look at what other predators
1:32:48
attack humans, people
1:32:50
are killed every year by black
1:32:52
bears, grizzly bears, some deer,
1:32:55
some elk, mountain lions, coyotes.
1:32:58
That's not true with wolves. And so you
1:33:00
say, why don't why don't people
1:33:03
kill wolves more often? Oh? My, I'm
1:33:05
sorry, I'm sorry, right.
1:33:06
That's what I mean.
1:33:07
And there I think it's an interesting question because they could.
1:33:09
Oh absolutely. I look at any of us
1:33:11
in this room. If one of us was out in
1:33:13
the woods by ourselves and a pack of eight wolves
1:33:15
came along, we'd be toast.
1:33:18
Yeah, I could handle three, but
1:33:20
eight probably.
1:33:22
Domestic dogs kill all kinds of people,
1:33:24
Yes, but they could.
1:33:26
Right, So what what is
1:33:28
your hypothesis as to why
1:33:30
not?
1:33:32
My thought about that is, well, we, first
1:33:34
of all, when we domesticated dogs, we changed
1:33:37
the gene pool. They have the dogs
1:33:39
here, but he's on my foot right
1:33:41
now, Okay, I'll make sure doesn't
1:33:43
pull any cables. Over the course of time
1:33:46
we have When we started domesticating
1:33:48
livestock about eleven thousand years
1:33:51
ago, we changed our relationship
1:33:53
with wolves. Prior to that, it
1:33:56
wasn't much. There was no reason I have conflict.
1:33:58
As a matter of fact, I talk about
1:34:00
some archaeologists,
1:34:03
some ancient people study wolves, and anciently
1:34:06
they their theory was that
1:34:10
humans in primitive times would
1:34:13
watch wolves haunt successfully. So
1:34:15
wolves and humans live in the same family structure
1:34:18
group of animals that are related. Usually they
1:34:20
would watch them hunt and they end up
1:34:22
learning that if they could follow the wolves,
1:34:26
they could steal meet from them. So
1:34:28
they would watch the wolves, and
1:34:30
when wolves picked out something, then the wolves
1:34:32
humans really humans could go over there with their adladdles
1:34:35
or spears, drive the wolves away, take
1:34:37
the meat they wanted, and then leave, and then the wolves
1:34:39
clean up the scraps. This was their hypothesis,
1:34:42
so they actually it was no way
1:34:45
a synergetic or altruistic
1:34:47
relationship. It's brutes arrival, but
1:34:50
they sort of collaborated and out
1:34:52
of that, eventually we learned
1:34:54
that we could make dogs, I guess, but I
1:34:56
think over time, once
1:34:59
we started to desticate animals, especially
1:35:01
livestock, those wolves
1:35:03
that were aggressive towards people were
1:35:06
weeded out and killed. And I think that gene
1:35:08
pool has been so heavily selected
1:35:10
against. I think the behavior
1:35:12
is still there. That's the only thing I can think of, because
1:35:15
how many people have successfully domesticated
1:35:17
allions made a different animal out of it, or bears
1:35:19
or coiotes, right, these other things that kill
1:35:22
us people haven't
1:35:24
And we've spent so much time competing
1:35:27
with wolves of their livestock and killing them that I
1:35:29
just think that aggression
1:35:31
towards people is no longer
1:35:33
there. And maybe with the crystal ball,
1:35:36
maybe three hundred yards from now and we haven't
1:35:38
been killing wolves, maybe that'll change. I
1:35:40
don't know. I don't know, but
1:35:42
it is an interesting question.
1:35:44
I was gonna just wanted to weigh. In
1:35:46
episode four sixty six Dire
1:35:48
Wolves and Ancient Hunting Dogs, we touch
1:35:51
on some of what you just mentioned Kith Angela
1:35:53
Perry and what does she say that
1:35:56
same thing we talked about that?
1:35:57
Okay, I'm gonna have to look that one up. I didn't hear it.
1:36:00
Whe do they fall? Like maybe
1:36:02
this is a weird question, but where do they fall on the intelligent
1:36:05
scale scale compared to like a bear or
1:36:07
a mountain lion or like
1:36:09
like would that play a role and they're
1:36:11
like understanding of how to
1:36:13
interact with humans, like,
1:36:15
are they smarter than.
1:36:16
A bear or Ah, the bear researchers
1:36:18
would say hell no, right, but I
1:36:22
can tell you. I mean I've trapped a lot of animals in
1:36:24
my life, everything from weasels to grizzlies,
1:36:26
and the wolves are the hardest animal to
1:36:28
catch. Bears are not hard at all
1:36:30
because they don't need to be. They're the top thing
1:36:33
and they eat everything. Wolves have had to
1:36:35
learn to sneaker on strict nine baits
1:36:38
guns, and because
1:36:40
they're a social species, they have to communicate
1:36:42
well, they have to collaborate. They're
1:36:45
different. I mean, none of these other predators
1:36:47
that we've been talking about are social and living
1:36:49
groups. And I believe that gives
1:36:51
wolves a need
1:36:54
evolutionarily to be high
1:36:56
intelligence. They have
1:36:58
to work, I do they I mean you
1:37:00
can look at your dog, which is kind of a challenged
1:37:04
version of a wolf. I mean, they're not that
1:37:06
good at anything, and they're
1:37:10
incredibly bright. I'm trying to use the right political term
1:37:12
here, but
1:37:14
they're incredibly brilliant. I mean, if you look at
1:37:16
what you can train a Melania or a border Collie
1:37:18
to do, and the wolves are much smarter
1:37:20
than that. They just are so
1:37:23
that's my humble opinion. But again the Baar researchers
1:37:26
would argue that, and case you have to. I mean, we're
1:37:28
looking at a human lens
1:37:31
to value intelligence.
1:37:33
That's really interesting, man. That's to
1:37:35
say that a wolf is smarter
1:37:37
than your pet dog.
1:37:39
Oh yeah, they don't
1:37:41
have to be smart. We feed them, we house
1:37:43
them.
1:37:44
They don't need.
1:37:45
To be smart.
1:37:46
They don't have to kill an elk every couple of
1:37:48
days, right, and yeah,
1:37:50
it's.
1:37:51
Like a wolf with a restrict plate or something.
1:37:56
Our dog is not an exceptional dog.
1:38:00
It's totally fine that everybody lif loves it, but it's
1:38:02
not exceptional anyway, used
1:38:04
to for whatever reason, would like to chew on rose
1:38:06
bushes and chew on raspberry bushes. It like the
1:38:09
for whatever reason, the thorniness of it. And
1:38:12
I have one time just took
1:38:14
my kids out and we put
1:38:17
a bunch of cayenne in the dirt
1:38:19
around a rose bush and
1:38:21
she went up to it and got a nose full of
1:38:23
that. Right, has never ever
1:38:26
gone.
1:38:27
Near same thing with you
1:38:29
know e callers and training and no dogs
1:38:31
are.
1:38:31
Sorry when you think about how getting hard to catch
1:38:35
the dog's like, dude, you
1:38:37
know, to make that connection, right, So
1:38:40
you think it's something being hard to trap, like
1:38:42
you sting its toe one time, and there's just something
1:38:44
about that situation.
1:38:46
Yeah, I mean the old timers
1:38:48
when they're read the books, the Last of the Loaners
1:38:50
and the last renegade wolves and guys
1:38:52
trying to catch them, the stuff they did to try
1:38:54
not smart these wolves. Sometimes. Well,
1:38:57
one of the worst things I read was they've been trapping
1:38:59
this this, this couple of wolves,
1:39:01
the last ones in the Southwest, and they
1:39:03
just couldn't catch the male, and
1:39:05
so they ended up catching the female
1:39:07
and then they took her and used her for bait, and the wolf
1:39:09
went in the next day. That was it. He was done
1:39:12
and they spent. Yeah, kind
1:39:14
of sad.
1:39:16
And Cormick McCarthy's the Crossing. He's
1:39:18
trying to catch a Mexican gray wolf, which
1:39:21
he then brings back across the border, but he winds
1:39:23
up he can't catch it, and
1:39:26
eventually makes a set in his fire
1:39:28
pit because
1:39:31
he would see that a wolf now and then come and sniff
1:39:33
around. So instead of making sets normal
1:39:35
sets, he made a set in his
1:39:37
fire, let this fire burn down,
1:39:39
cool off, and then made a set in there. I
1:39:41
think that's how he catches it. That's how he
1:39:43
gets it, gets it, I don't know. Then
1:39:47
he brings it back to Mexico because he can't bring himself
1:39:49
to kill it, Like he's supposed to catch it and kill it,
1:39:51
but can't. He brings it back to Mexican and it quickly
1:39:53
dies. Anyways, that's how
1:39:55
Corny McCarthy
1:39:58
soone kills it. Anyways.
1:40:00
Wow, that's a cheerful story. Well,
1:40:03
I mean, when it comes to wolves,
1:40:04
there's no good ends
1:40:07
for any large carnivore in the wild,
1:40:09
you know. I mean, they don't end isn't good
1:40:11
for them, no matter what it is. But they try and
1:40:13
live a really full life, and most importantly they dry and
1:40:15
leave their jeans behind. If they can
1:40:18
do that, they've succeeded.
1:40:19
But you're saying they don't move to a golf course. Watch
1:40:21
a lot of network telling there.
1:40:23
Was Okay, this is not in my book,
1:40:25
but we my last couple of years of working, we
1:40:27
got a call from somebody living in a
1:40:29
gated community between Whitefish and Callous
1:40:32
Spell and called up said we've
1:40:34
got some wolf pups in our driveway. And it's like,
1:40:36
oh, okay, great, thanks, I'm thinking
1:40:39
it's got to be skyotes. Yeah,
1:40:41
they're living in this gated community in an urban
1:40:43
area. So anyway, I said, I said,
1:40:45
we took some videos. I said, great,
1:40:47
can you send me the video? So they email me the video.
1:40:50
It's like, oh my god, those are wolf pups,
1:40:52
no kidding, in their driveway next to
1:40:54
their mailbox and they're playing in the culvert
1:40:56
that goes under their driveway. It's like wow.
1:40:59
So we go out there and talk to other neighbors
1:41:01
and several people had seen them. And
1:41:03
so this is a gated community with people
1:41:06
with huge houses. They're
1:41:08
all realthy. They love wildlife.
1:41:10
That's where they live there. There's huge amounts of green
1:41:12
space in the community. There's white tails
1:41:14
everywhere because no hunting is allowed. Talk
1:41:17
about Nirvana for wolves. They're
1:41:19
protected, they got endless food resources.
1:41:22
No one's going to hurt them. So we
1:41:24
tried to catch the adults through
1:41:26
a male and female. Had
1:41:29
no luck.
1:41:29
These are what reasons did you want to catch put a collar on it?
1:41:31
Oh, I want to know what happened at the end of the
1:41:33
summer. Okay, So what happens what's
1:41:35
going to happen when they leave this? You know, ten square
1:41:38
mile gated community. We couldn't
1:41:40
catch them. They were so smart about
1:41:42
people. We had them on trail cameras, couldn't
1:41:45
get them to step on the magic pan
1:41:47
the size you know of an oreo cookie. Literally.
1:41:50
And then after summer came and
1:41:52
the wolves went on and they left and they have
1:41:54
to disperse the bigger happy hunting grounds
1:41:57
square miles on average for a pack they
1:42:01
just won by one got shot gone,
1:42:04
So but they can't live in ten square
1:42:06
miles. They have to move on. But
1:42:08
it was so interesting to me that those wolves
1:42:10
set up in that community. Yeah,
1:42:13
so, I mean they will try to live.
1:42:14
That wasn't by accident.
1:42:16
I don't know how smart is a wolf.
1:42:18
I don't know, yeah, smarter than Can
1:42:21
you contextualize that a little bit more
1:42:23
about how there's no good ending for a
1:42:25
wolf because I think we all in this room understand
1:42:27
what that means when you say that, but I
1:42:30
think that a lot of people out there are When
1:42:32
you say that, it almost sounds
1:42:34
like you're saying, oh, they're all going to end up getting shot. But
1:42:36
that's not what you're saying.
1:42:37
No, I mean, a wolf is an
1:42:39
apex predator, top predator. It's
1:42:42
always hunting to hunt. It's
1:42:44
always having to compete for food, so they get
1:42:47
In Yellowstone Park, the largest cause immortality
1:42:49
is wolves killing other wolves protecting
1:42:52
their territory. They trespass and they get
1:42:54
killed outside of the park,
1:42:57
even when I was doing my work when they were still
1:42:59
protected. Eighty five percent of mortality
1:43:02
is caused by humans. They
1:43:05
don't live very long. Take a guess and how
1:43:07
long. So if we put together the data from Yellowstone
1:43:10
Park in Minnesota and Montana, take a guess
1:43:12
in the average longevity
1:43:14
of a wolf from the time they're detected,
1:43:16
because some die in the den young, so by the time
1:43:19
they're four or five weeks old in their scene until
1:43:21
they die, take a guess annual mortality.
1:43:24
Take an average average age at which they
1:43:27
die.
1:43:28
Four eighteen months.
1:43:29
I'm going to go six months,
1:43:32
four point.
1:43:33
Three, four point three.
1:43:35
Did you read that? No? I didn't.
1:43:36
You're right on the money four point three.
1:43:38
I was gonna go with four point six, but then I hedged my bets
1:43:40
and you thought you were going to surprise us.
1:43:42
Randall for the four he
1:43:44
gets the trip four point three years.
1:43:47
Oh, it's years years.
1:43:49
So they most of them don't live
1:43:52
long enough to reproduce what is the like
1:43:54
to randal ding ding ding.
1:43:57
A doctrine he does, and are
1:44:00
you out? Like so do I?
1:44:03
Not including Yellowstone perhaps,
1:44:06
but like, what is the survival rate
1:44:08
of say a litter of six pups, how many
1:44:10
of them will reach sexual maturity?
1:44:14
Is that a pretty high survival rate if.
1:44:16
They make it to the till like
1:44:18
the second year, they do pretty well. The first
1:44:21
year when they go between a year and
1:44:23
two years, when they're starting to dispersal and they're
1:44:25
starting to look around them, the pups
1:44:27
themselves, like they pups
1:44:29
generally make it. Generally when the
1:44:31
time they're little till their first year, they do really
1:44:33
well because they're all protected, their fed until
1:44:36
they get trapped or shot during hunting seasons
1:44:38
or or if they get Sometimes
1:44:41
humans have introduced parbo virus in distemper
1:44:44
in an environment, and if that gets into the
1:44:46
litter, mortality is very high.
1:44:48
Do they ever do that thing that
1:44:51
bears sometimes do where a male
1:44:53
come in and kill No, they don't do
1:44:55
that.
1:44:55
Nope. Yeah, I was gonna ask other than humans,
1:44:58
what's killing wolves?
1:45:00
Deer elk avalanches? The
1:45:03
first wolves? The wolves kill each
1:45:05
other? Yeah, I just said that in Yellowstone,
1:45:07
So like the first mortality, Recorded
1:45:10
Mortality and Yellowstone Park I
1:45:12
was told was a
1:45:15
UPS driver killing a wolf when he ran it
1:45:17
over. I thought, could you imagine being
1:45:19
that ups? Turf's like, oh my god, I just
1:45:21
killed the national icon about
1:45:24
it.
1:45:25
I hope is hiring.
1:45:28
So yeah, and they
1:45:30
get killed by lions, they
1:45:33
starve. I did have
1:45:35
one wolf dining an avalanche.
1:45:37
What about bears? The bears get after him.
1:45:40
They can if it's one on one, but when you
1:45:42
had a whole wolf pack. Yeah, wolves kill,
1:45:44
wolves kill black bears. Wolves
1:45:46
will kill a grizzly cub if they can, but usually
1:45:49
they can't. But one on one, I think,
1:45:51
Well, wolves are pretty fast.
1:45:53
Do they go way out of their way to kill coyotes in
1:45:56
places?
1:45:57
They do? Yeah? In Yellowstone Park
1:45:59
they filled them digging up coyote dens and killing
1:46:01
the pups. Pretty gruesome.
1:46:04
Do they got it in for Red Fox too?
1:46:06
No? So there's this
1:46:08
yeah in the book, so trophic
1:46:11
cascades we're going to get in a little bit. And I
1:46:13
just want you to know that before I wrote this book,
1:46:15
or while I was writing this book, I
1:46:18
ended up working with Jim Hafflefinger,
1:46:20
Dave oz Been. I mean, it was
1:46:23
really a hell of a good team. I was asked to be
1:46:25
the senior author for the latest. We
1:46:27
did an update on everything known
1:46:29
about wolves in North America. We
1:46:31
ended up being forty
1:46:34
thousand words long and an eight hundred
1:46:36
reference bibliography. It was
1:46:38
a scientific work. It was grueling,
1:46:41
it was interesting, difficult.
1:46:44
This was my anecdote for writing that this
1:46:47
book, so because
1:46:50
this was more
1:46:52
fun and personal. But the science is
1:46:54
in that book. It's a
1:46:56
major chapter. You can get it online. But
1:46:59
I learned a lot. We had Dean Cloth
1:47:01
from Canada. We had Joey yet And who
1:47:03
does the Red wolves. We had Brent Patterson
1:47:05
who does the Algonquin wolves.
1:47:07
We had Adrian Wineban who does the Midwestern
1:47:09
wolves. People from every social
1:47:12
I mean every segment of the population. I
1:47:15
learned a lot. So in terms of getting
1:47:17
back, we all wonder why don't
1:47:20
wolves kill people more often? But
1:47:23
what was the question? I'm sorry, I'm rambling. Foxes.
1:47:26
Yeah, so Tofa Cascades.
1:47:28
So they documented Yellowstone like ooh, this
1:47:30
is big earthshaking information that coyotes
1:47:33
had kind of taken over the cana
1:47:35
and niche in Yellowstone and kept the foxes
1:47:38
population subdued, and then wolves
1:47:40
came back and killed lots of
1:47:42
coyotes, and then the fox population
1:47:44
responded by increasing because wolves
1:47:46
don't really care about fox they're not really a competitor,
1:47:49
and foxes benefit from wolves they clean up
1:47:51
kills. We documented
1:47:53
that earlier in the North Fork years, because
1:47:56
when I arrived in the North Fork there
1:47:58
was we never saw fox anywhere
1:48:00
up there. The first fifteen years we had people out
1:48:02
all winter tracking on the snow.
1:48:05
We never saw a fox track. I never caught
1:48:07
a fox in a trap. And then when
1:48:09
the wolves started building up populations,
1:48:11
I was collaring and studying coyotes
1:48:13
at the same time, and the coyote
1:48:16
population. As the wolves went up, the coyotes
1:48:18
went down, and then we started seeing fox.
1:48:21
I got fox standing on my property. Now fox
1:48:23
are everywhere, Wolves are everywhere, Coyotes
1:48:26
not so much so.
1:48:27
He's a wolf sees that kyote and he just recognizes
1:48:30
it as a competitor.
1:48:31
You think something to get rid of, and.
1:48:33
He sees a fox and he just doesn't get too worked out.
1:48:35
It's kind of a nuisance.
1:48:37
It's a difference.
1:48:37
That's funny because I've I feel like I've heard
1:48:40
people make that observation just
1:48:42
in different parts of the West, like
1:48:44
in Idaho specifically, people
1:48:46
say, the coyotes have really
1:48:49
dropped in numbers and we're seeing foxes now and
1:48:51
we never really saw him before.
1:48:52
Right, Yeah, that's that's interesting too,
1:48:54
because in Michigan where
1:48:56
I grew up, it was always fox like,
1:48:59
you know, trappers targeted red fox. That's
1:49:02
just when coyotes came in in the early nineties
1:49:04
when they really exploded in that area. I mean,
1:49:06
the fox vanished.
1:49:08
Man, do you need more wolves?
1:49:10
What's sounds
1:49:13
like.
1:49:15
A mutual friend of ours likes
1:49:17
to use that as an analogy to humans,
1:49:20
where he's like a wolf
1:49:23
likes to go around the landscape and go that
1:49:25
ain't good for me and mine getting rid
1:49:27
of it. And we're
1:49:30
on a landscape going, oh
1:49:32
no, let's bring in more wolves. We might
1:49:34
have less elk or less this
1:49:36
or that, but let's keep
1:49:38
them around. And he's saying, like, why are
1:49:40
we the only sort of apex predator
1:49:42
that would tolerate or even think of
1:49:44
having competition as
1:49:47
like a good thing, instead of saying, let's just
1:49:49
get rid of all of them like a wolf
1:49:51
might do, so that there's it's
1:49:53
better for it for it's its species.
1:49:56
You know, that's a good point, like like wolf a
1:50:00
it's wolf lovers love all
1:50:02
these things about wolves, but they don't like to
1:50:04
see it in people.
1:50:06
M M.
1:50:08
You know, if you're like man, that could be a lot of competition.
1:50:11
I don't want that here, just thinking
1:50:14
like a.
1:50:14
Wearable I
1:50:17
have a question for you. So when
1:50:19
Krinn called me, she said,
1:50:21
you have experienced increased
1:50:27
enthusiasmic excitement, hatred, whatever wolf
1:50:29
issue has been building still,
1:50:31
like we see it all the time in Montana.
1:50:33
I've seen this.
1:50:34
Well, well we talk about this, we talk about
1:50:37
right now and then on the podcast and then yeah,
1:50:39
people right, I mean the feelings.
1:50:41
Are feelings are running higher about
1:50:43
wolves now than they were twenty years old.
1:50:44
Well, no, no, no, I would say that. I
1:50:47
would say that feelings, whatever
1:50:50
high running feelings there are are
1:50:53
high running only because
1:50:56
of what's going on in Colorado.
1:50:58
And then that reignited the entire
1:51:00
debate. But I would not say
1:51:02
generally, well, okay, there's
1:51:05
a there's another hot area. Another
1:51:07
hot area is in
1:51:11
Minnesota, Wisconsin,
1:51:13
my home state of Michigan. I just came from and got
1:51:15
a lot of earfolds about this. Hunters
1:51:19
are really disappointed in
1:51:21
the collapse of deer numbers
1:51:24
and then not and then the states
1:51:27
not having any authority to come
1:51:29
in and do any kind of wolf control. And
1:51:31
there's a little bit of a question of like how bad does
1:51:33
it have to get and do we really need
1:51:35
to like trade our deer hunting for wolves,
1:51:38
and we can't seek a compromise and more
1:51:40
of a balance them being like I
1:51:43
don't want to be apologetic about liking the deer
1:51:46
hunt. I want to be able to deer hunt and have success.
1:51:48
So what are what are this? I mean,
1:51:51
Wisconsin had a huge wolf season
1:51:53
and they really kill a lot of wolves, And what
1:51:56
is the wolf season in Michigan?
1:51:57
And well there's none because they got put back on the.
1:52:00
Sea to protect them.
1:52:01
Yeah, so an their back.
1:52:02
They've closed it. They've had it, they've closed
1:52:04
it.
1:52:05
So we've had this discussion about should should
1:52:08
wolves be listed or not? Right
1:52:11
everywhere where they've come back, all of
1:52:13
them in Western states, Midwestern
1:52:16
states, some of the western
1:52:18
states, they have exceeded
1:52:21
way beyond expectations of delisting
1:52:24
criteria. Yes, four years on end.
1:52:28
So what is the value of the Endangered Species
1:52:31
Act if you don't follow the
1:52:33
rules of the criteria.
1:52:34
And I'm not saying I can tell you what it is. It's
1:52:36
not anymore. It is my
1:52:39
favorite animal protection Act.
1:52:42
It's very valuable to the people who that's
1:52:44
how, you know, create
1:52:46
lawsuits.
1:52:47
They don't want to talk about the numbers. They don't care
1:52:49
about the numbers.
1:52:49
I've had lots of people ask me when I
1:52:52
do public texts, do you feel wolf should be
1:52:54
relisted? And I say relisted like
1:52:57
in Montana? Do you feel wolf should be realisted? They're
1:52:59
delisted in Montana? Yeah, And
1:53:01
I say then I say,
1:53:03
okay, geographically which area Montana? And
1:53:05
I say, well, you know, I
1:53:07
don't like to see dead, bleeding wolves hanging off
1:53:09
of tailgates, but they have exceeded
1:53:12
recovery standards. There are approximately
1:53:14
a quarter million of wolves worldwide.
1:53:17
There are how many whooping cranes, how many
1:53:19
blackfooted ferrets? And I
1:53:21
can't say biologically that
1:53:23
we have any reason to have Montana
1:53:26
wolves or Midwestern wolves on the
1:53:28
endangered species lifts where they're connected to
1:53:30
Canadian populations that go into tens
1:53:32
of thousands. On the
1:53:34
other hand, do I like what
1:53:36
I see going on with the management of wolves
1:53:39
in Montana in particular, and the very strong
1:53:41
anti wolve sentiments. No, But
1:53:44
does it mean that they should go
1:53:46
back on the list. No, so
1:53:50
can people through increased
1:53:52
harvest intentsive harvest knock
1:53:55
wolves down to from the spout
1:53:57
a thousand now or nine hundred two one
1:54:00
hundred and fifty, which is the trigger point
1:54:02
at which the ESA says, ooh,
1:54:04
you've now endangered this population and we're going to put
1:54:06
them back on the endangered species list.
1:54:09
It would be really difficult because right now people
1:54:11
can hunt trap night
1:54:13
shoot predator called dig dens.
1:54:16
I mean, you can do almost anything with wolves
1:54:18
for half the year.
1:54:19
We've talked about this before, like in the case
1:54:21
of Montana or Wyoming
1:54:24
or Idaho, like it
1:54:26
would never be in the state's best interest
1:54:28
to knock them back to that point
1:54:30
because then the FEDS would come back in and
1:54:33
exactly.
1:54:33
But what I'm saying is people are the
1:54:36
pro wolf public. I sit
1:54:38
in the middle, but I'm obviously passionate
1:54:41
about wolves. So the pro
1:54:43
wolf public thinks that by increasing
1:54:45
all of these parameters to allow
1:54:48
more take I don't like the word
1:54:50
harvests more kill, that we're
1:54:52
going to put them down one hundred and fifty. I
1:54:55
think you can't do that without poison.
1:54:58
Because you're right that's the point you're is
1:55:00
it. Even as liberal as it is here for six
1:55:02
months out of the year, we're still not able to
1:55:04
knock them back that much.
1:55:06
Right, We've caught them back some, and I mean,
1:55:09
like this guy in Daniel's Montaneo,
1:55:11
Dianuel Wyoming, it
1:55:14
just is disgusting. I just you shouldn't do that with
1:55:16
an elk, with a bear. With a wolf, should just behave
1:55:18
like that with a wild animal. But with
1:55:21
the liberal seasons we've got, and this year
1:55:23
they did increase, their harvest is up to I think two
1:55:25
hundred and eighty six for the last license year,
1:55:27
which is a little more than the year before.
1:55:30
But we've had years where there's been three hundred.
1:55:33
The population isn't changing a
1:55:35
lot. But on
1:55:37
the other hand, using the method
1:55:40
they used to estimate wolf populations
1:55:42
through palm, I
1:55:44
think patch
1:55:47
occupancy model, it's an integrated
1:55:50
patchcy model. Occupancy
1:55:52
models are designed to
1:55:55
estimate occupancy where they are. They're
1:55:57
not designed to estimate abundance or
1:55:59
numbers, so they're using a model
1:56:03
for not what is designed to do. So I don't
1:56:05
know that it's a real good representative. What I would
1:56:07
say is I'm sorry, no go ahead. There's
1:56:09
other factors to look at, like go
1:56:12
to the Livestock Loss Board website.
1:56:14
It's public information for
1:56:16
Montana or any agency or the USDA,
1:56:18
you know, Wildlife services, and you can look at
1:56:21
the number of livestock losses
1:56:23
by predator. They list them by predator
1:56:26
or by death cause, and you will see,
1:56:28
especially in Montana, the number of
1:56:31
livestock depredations in Montana
1:56:34
is getting was less in twenty twenty
1:56:36
three than it was for the previous
1:56:38
years. The number of complaints was
1:56:41
less, the number of wolves taken for killing
1:56:43
livestock was less. If
1:56:45
there are wolves on the landscape Montana
1:56:48
and there's livestock, they
1:56:50
will kill them occasionally. So I would say
1:56:52
these other indices should be incorporated
1:56:55
into the model because I
1:56:57
think when you see less and less and less depredation,
1:57:00
it's because there's less wolves. Even
1:57:02
though people are killed more this year,
1:57:04
and if you look at the percentage statistically,
1:57:07
it's probably not real significant. But maybe
1:57:10
more people were out hunting last year to hind kill
1:57:12
wolves because it was a milder winter. We don't know,
1:57:14
We can't.
1:57:14
Did you say it was to eighty six that
1:57:17
were killed or it was two eighty six was the quota.
1:57:19
No, that was what was killed between shooting
1:57:22
and trapping. Yeah, I think that's the
1:57:24
current number. You can look it up and
1:57:26
it just that was just released. But there's
1:57:29
many things to look at. But what I can say is
1:57:31
there's there's adequate wolves, and
1:57:34
I'd say there's adequate prey.
1:57:36
And I was looking, did you see that chidge
1:57:39
who Just in Fergus County near Lewistown,
1:57:42
several several
1:57:45
large landowners got together and wanted
1:57:47
the state to kill fifty
1:57:50
thousand elk because
1:57:53
the elk are taking over the private
1:57:56
large landowner's habitat
1:57:59
and they don't allow people to come in and shoot
1:58:02
them. So they're all these elk and they wanted to
1:58:04
have this power to kill fifty thousand
1:58:06
elk extra outside of normal
1:58:09
hunting season.
1:58:09
Fifty thousand five.
1:58:11
That was that United Property Owners
1:58:14
thing.
1:58:14
Right back, BHA YAH
1:58:16
and BHA.
1:58:17
And Montana Sportsman's Alliance and all these
1:58:19
hunting groups said no, you
1:58:22
have to create access. And I think
1:58:25
if people are really concerned about elk numbers,
1:58:27
because if you look at the tables the statistics,
1:58:30
there are more elk in Montana now then there's been
1:58:32
in a long time. And in Wyoming they're issuing
1:58:34
unlimited number of elk takes in twenty twenty
1:58:36
three, I believe, or twenty twenty four. It
1:58:39
seems from my perspective, you would
1:58:41
know more you guys deal with your hunting company.
1:58:43
It seems to be more of an access issue
1:58:46
than it does a predator issue. And if
1:58:48
I were a hunting big
1:58:50
part of a hunting conservation promotion group,
1:58:53
I would be working on the access issue
1:58:56
more and working with our legislators
1:58:58
more and our governors more. Know you
1:59:00
know what these rich
1:59:03
out of state guys or whoever own these ranches said,
1:59:05
they're not letting us on. I would I would be
1:59:07
really concerned about it. What do you guys feel about
1:59:09
that?
1:59:10
I mean, I think that's the in some areas
1:59:12
that's the biggest conversation around elk numbers
1:59:14
is you have just
1:59:20
you have elk that are learning over
1:59:23
time. Elk are learning safe zones.
1:59:26
There are big acreages where hunting's not
1:59:28
allowed, and there are big acreages
1:59:30
where people have
1:59:33
an objective of getting a couple
1:59:36
of big bulls and
1:59:38
they don't want something to mess up those big
1:59:40
bulls. They don't want people to push them
1:59:42
off. They kind of like them
1:59:44
during hunting season. They don't like them when they're
1:59:46
doing crop damage, and they're
1:59:48
reluctant to have Joe
1:59:50
Blow running
1:59:53
around on their place. And
1:59:56
they kind of want the best of both worlds. They
1:59:58
want they want individual access,
2:00:01
then they want state help. And what
2:00:03
they don't want is a sign
2:00:06
saying come one call
2:00:08
right.
2:00:09
They need more wolves.
2:00:10
Just kidding, I'm just kidding on
2:00:12
that.
2:00:14
But you see the problem
2:00:16
again, it's always humans. But
2:00:19
if you look at the species
2:00:22
keep responsible for killing sheep and cattle,
2:00:24
it's number one. Grizzly bears kill almost
2:00:27
three times as many livestock animals
2:00:29
as both lions and wolves, and
2:00:32
lions generally kill a few
2:00:34
more than wolves, but it's hard to confirm totally.
2:00:36
Because lions kill more
2:00:38
livestock than wolves.
2:00:39
The confirmed kills. The hard thing is when a
2:00:41
wolf kills a cattle or a calf
2:00:44
or whatever, there's six or eight them feeding on
2:00:46
it, so there's often not enough evidence less
2:00:48
to determine which predator responsible.
2:00:50
So there's a lot more probables
2:00:53
for wolves than there are lions, but confirmed
2:00:55
it's more lions and wolves.
2:00:58
Where you got wolves and mountain lion overlapping,
2:01:00
what's killing most.
2:01:01
Of the game lions. Do
2:01:04
you look at the Bitter at Elk study. Yeah,
2:01:06
so it's surprising to me. So there's been
2:01:08
three studies that Fish, Wildlife and Parks
2:01:10
has done. And this is an agency that's not
2:01:13
real pro wolf, right, let's just say
2:01:15
so, they do these studies. And when I was looking
2:01:18
at the research study
2:01:20
plan and the results, I was shocked because
2:01:22
I thought wolves would be the primary
2:01:24
predator. But you can go on the FWP website
2:01:27
google the data. They did three studies
2:01:29
that were long term, multi region studies,
2:01:32
one for moose, one for mule deer,
2:01:34
and one for elk. And they looked at the populations
2:01:37
of this the game animals three different
2:01:39
areas over multiple years, and they put
2:01:41
a lot of callers out and they looked at mortality.
2:01:44
So and the bitter at Elk study, probably
2:01:47
all familiar lions killed more. And
2:01:49
when they increased the harvest on black bears
2:01:51
and wolves lions still.
2:01:54
That had no effect.
2:01:56
And the more they were just lions killing everything.
2:01:58
They thought the same thing in Idaho. Wives your way
2:02:00
out.
2:02:00
Killing wolves, yes, and when So when they
2:02:03
did the moose study, what do you think the number
2:02:05
one killer of moose was it
2:02:07
was grompy.
2:02:07
What you think lions?
2:02:09
No, black, No, it
2:02:12
was tis.
2:02:14
It was climate and habitat exactly
2:02:17
they killed like it was fifty six
2:02:19
percent of the most mortalities documented.
2:02:21
The rerelated to climate.
2:02:23
That would be ticks, uh, mostly
2:02:25
probably ticks and things related.
2:02:27
Predation was a very small section of
2:02:29
the pie, and I was surprised of
2:02:32
the predation section. So you beans
2:02:34
killed almost the same percentage almost
2:02:36
as the predators a little less of
2:02:38
the predation section. It was wolves
2:02:40
first, I think bear a second,
2:02:43
lions there, but wolves was slightly more. But
2:02:45
yeah, the environment changing.
2:02:47
The habitat Milder's got way lions
2:02:50
was lions.
2:02:51
So why do people want to keep increasing.
2:02:53
Wolf because the lions were because the lions
2:02:55
were always here. That was kind of the thing
2:02:57
that we talked about with Idaho. Is you had
2:03:00
you had? I don't. I'm gonna butcher not. These are not
2:03:02
the right numbers, but it paints a somewhat
2:03:05
accurate portrait. It'd be like prior
2:03:08
to wolves coming into the Idaho
2:03:10
Panhandle. I don't. Again,
2:03:12
this is not the exact number, but it's not crazy.
2:03:14
It'd be that lines are killing
2:03:17
thirty out of one hundred elk
2:03:19
calves. Let's say, yeah, okay, something
2:03:22
like that. But that had
2:03:24
always been true, and everything
2:03:26
about elk abundance and everything about what
2:03:29
like what statically normal, right,
2:03:31
just normal life that was going on,
2:03:34
and then something comes in and it adds ten.
2:03:38
Okay, So now forty
2:03:40
out of one hundred elk calves are
2:03:42
dying from predation because
2:03:45
there's this new additive thing,
2:03:47
and socially and otherwise with the population,
2:03:50
it winds up being that ten percent
2:03:53
tips of balance that we'd become used to. And
2:03:56
so you know, people had seen it's always
2:03:58
been normal, yeah, and then now it's not normal
2:04:01
no more. What happened different? This
2:04:03
new thing that the baseline had always
2:04:06
burned? Right, You'd always lost those
2:04:08
thirty yepp and you had an
2:04:10
elk population that reflected that level
2:04:12
of predation, and all of a sudden, now you have an elk population
2:04:15
that doesn't reflect that. It reflects something new, and
2:04:17
it's going to be lower.
2:04:18
So you're saying, all the wolf coming
2:04:20
back is the additive, none of its compensatory
2:04:23
mortality.
2:04:24
Man, I know the terms you're using,
2:04:26
but I can't answer that.
2:04:28
So you're not seeing lion
2:04:30
populations diminishing down to
2:04:33
twenty percent of the elk caves say instead
2:04:35
that the oh that
2:04:37
the wolves are now taking ten percent
2:04:39
that the lions would.
2:04:40
Take it must have been additive, because
2:04:42
how else can you explain the map. I
2:04:44
mean, like, this is the thing that that people
2:04:46
have to accept, Like the really pro
2:04:49
wolf people have to accept that this is
2:04:51
true. And when they're when they're kind of being honest,
2:04:53
they acknowledge it. Meaning
2:04:56
on one hand, they like think hunters blow
2:04:59
it out, everything out of proportion, and hunters are like,
2:05:01
oh, we're gonna lose all of our dear and l right, and
2:05:04
they criticize hunters for that. At the same
2:05:06
time, they'll say, oh, if CWD
2:05:09
is from having two dens of populations,
2:05:12
wolves will help. And you're like, well, I
2:05:14
thought that you're saying that hunters are wrong and
2:05:16
that wolves don't lower game numbers. Now you're
2:05:18
saying they do. Or they'll say
2:05:21
deer and elk are over browsing,
2:05:24
right, wolves will help.
2:05:26
It's like, homet let's back up, because earlier you
2:05:28
told me it doesn't matter the ways,
2:05:30
that doesn't matter for deering out numbers, so it does
2:05:32
matter for deering out numbers. Right. It's like you
2:05:35
can't argue, and you know this better
2:05:37
than me, but you can't argue. Like in
2:05:40
the Greater Yellstone ecosystem, when wolves
2:05:42
came in in the mid nineties, there's
2:05:45
no other word for it. Elk numbers collapsed.
2:05:47
They collapsed.
2:05:48
But and the.
2:05:48
Panhandle Idaho elk numbers just like there's
2:05:50
no other word for what happened. They collapsed.
2:05:53
But do you know about the winters that the wolves
2:05:55
came into. Idoh is the heaviest winters ever recorded.
2:05:58
The wolves came into Yells and
2:06:00
twenty thousand elk on the northern range
2:06:03
of Lamar is not a normal range
2:06:05
of numbers of animals that should
2:06:07
be there anyway.
2:06:08
Okay, I mean you know all that.
2:06:10
I think we talked about this last time. But the
2:06:12
winters of ninety six ninety seven, that
2:06:14
was the second winter they put in. I thought
2:06:16
that you can sit there, maybe
2:06:18
you can, but tell me that thirty wolves
2:06:20
are going to kill ten thousand outs.
2:06:22
No, it wasn't. I don't think that it was. I
2:06:24
think that it was very long term. Yeah it
2:06:26
was. It wasn't that year. It wasn't like the ones they
2:06:28
brought in. Yeah, yeah, I mean, but correct
2:06:30
me if I'm wrong. Like you know it better than me. But
2:06:33
is it not fair? Is it
2:06:35
not fair to say that, let's talk about the Idaho Panhandle.
2:06:38
I don't know about the idol Pana. I can talk about the
2:06:40
lamar pretty.
2:06:40
Good, Okay. Wherever the lamar.
2:06:43
Yeah, Yellowstone, Northern
2:06:45
Herd.
2:06:46
Okay, bad
2:06:49
winners or not? I mean, come
2:06:51
on, that had unless
2:06:54
I'm wrong, that had the
2:06:56
incoming wolves and the expansion of wolf populations.
2:06:58
Elk had a big change on
2:07:00
elk because that's also if we remember,
2:07:03
we're all supposed to celebrate them for bringing
2:07:05
the beavers back, which has now been
2:07:07
walked back and not true. So
2:07:09
it did something to elk, right.
2:07:12
Yeah, and you could pull up the table. But the elk, the alk
2:07:14
numbers fell off really fast in that hard
2:07:16
winter. And like in Montana in
2:07:19
ninety six ninety seven, Carolyn sim
2:07:21
was doing white tail deer study in northwest Montana
2:07:24
and forty percent of the white tail
2:07:26
died win or die off and had nothing
2:07:28
to do without Okay. So I'm just saying with
2:07:30
wolves.
2:07:32
It couldn't like And in the case of the
2:07:34
bitter, the way someone described it to me,
2:07:36
I can't remember who was Like the
2:07:39
elk, there could sustain like some
2:07:41
certain level of predation
2:07:44
and maintain a certain r
2:07:46
number. But when you put
2:07:49
it the wolf on top of it, that was
2:07:51
like just enough to be a tipping
2:07:53
point to push.
2:07:54
Them over the edge or push them on a private
2:07:56
land where people don't allow them. You're hunted. That's
2:07:58
what's happening in.
2:07:59
The bitter But like in the case of like
2:08:01
a bad winner, you stack wolves
2:08:03
on top of that, maybe the elk, yeah
2:08:07
could have you know what I mean, Like it's just
2:08:09
one more thing they've got to deal
2:08:11
with.
2:08:11
So I mean, I just read the scientific literature
2:08:13
and I'm a hunter too, But in
2:08:16
Yellowstone there are so many factories.
2:08:18
It's really I would say it's unfair
2:08:21
to say one is to blame. It's a huge
2:08:23
puzzle with many factors. And since the wolves
2:08:25
come back, the olk numbers have definitely decreased.
2:08:28
But I think they're actually had a better sustainable
2:08:30
lever. I mean, do you know in the sixties they're in their gunning
2:08:33
and killing elk because there were too many elk and there
2:08:35
were not enough predators. They were shooting them like
2:08:37
a thousand a year or whatever. They don't have to
2:08:39
do that anymore. There's what six
2:08:41
sixty five hundred elk in the northern herd now
2:08:44
versus twenty thousand, and it's kind
2:08:46
of stabilized at that. And the wolves have
2:08:48
stabilized at about one hundred, and
2:08:50
they've switched to bison. They a lot of their
2:08:53
food value now is bison, which
2:08:55
I must mind modeling me. I'm
2:08:57
not saying they can't limiting. I'm just saying there's
2:09:00
a lot of things going on, and I think the humans
2:09:03
really got used. I've been on one of those late gardener
2:09:05
hunts and.
2:09:06
Oh my god, what is zoo in the eighties.
2:09:09
Yeah, because there were too many elk
2:09:11
they had to do that. Well, they don't do it anymore, and people
2:09:13
are pissed off about it because I want to go down there
2:09:15
and get my late gardener hunt. Well, that is
2:09:17
not a sustainable population to have
2:09:19
to have people go in and kill starving elk in
2:09:22
February. I mean, we
2:09:24
can look at it anywhere you want.
2:09:25
Can we go back to our crystal ball in Colorado?
2:09:27
Oh?
2:09:27
God, yes, was it a
2:09:29
twenty year? We were talking about ten ten twenty years. Okay,
2:09:32
let me hit you with this. Yeah, let's
2:09:34
say there are one
2:09:37
hundred deer in elk in Colorado
2:09:39
today? How
2:09:41
many deer in elk are there in twenty years.
2:09:46
Due too?
2:09:47
Because of wolves?
2:09:48
Oh, because of wolf.
2:09:49
There's one hundred now, Yeah, one hundred deer elk
2:09:51
are in Colorado now. And you do your twenty year crystal
2:09:54
ball. Where has that population settled out?
2:09:57
Eighty or ninety maybe might be one hundred.
2:09:59
The other is people population.
2:10:01
We keep growing in and building. Well,
2:10:04
it is part of it because people build
2:10:06
an elk winter range. Look at the Paradise Valley,
2:10:08
for God's sakes, they've destroyed a lot of elk
2:10:10
wind arrange where they elk used to doing.
2:10:11
Well, that's where the wolves could do that tipping point
2:10:13
there. Yeah, get because like Colorado's
2:10:16
elk or like in
2:10:18
places, their numbers are already crashing
2:10:20
because of black bear predation and elk
2:10:23
calves. And then you get like development
2:10:25
of winter range and then a huge amount
2:10:27
of recreation like hiking
2:10:29
and biking, and then you
2:10:31
throw wolves on top of that, and it's like you
2:10:34
could look at it that way, you
2:10:36
know what's going to happen.
2:10:38
I just look at what's going on in Montana,
2:10:41
where we had wolves for forty years. In Wyoming
2:10:43
they've had wolves for years, and elk numbers
2:10:45
are higher than they've ever been, So
2:10:47
I don't know how. I mean, you could look at whatever
2:10:50
end of the scale you want to look at. I'd like to kind
2:10:52
of come to the middle. There'll be places where wolves can
2:10:54
impact populations. Lions certainly
2:10:56
have, bears have people
2:10:59
have Because we're building holding up into habitat
2:11:01
that is absolutely critical. For those on gillets
2:11:03
in the winter, they don't have it anymore. So
2:11:06
where do they go They become victims to prey
2:11:08
animals or they get hit on the roadway. My
2:11:10
god, driving down from Livingston
2:11:13
to Gardner and the winters like slaloming
2:11:15
through white tail and elk everywhere.
2:11:17
It's awful. So we
2:11:19
could pick whatever data set you want
2:11:22
to use. But they've co existed
2:11:24
long before we were ever in the landscape, That's
2:11:26
all I'm going to say. And before when
2:11:28
Lewis and Clark came to this country on
2:11:31
the with the West, wolves a lot
2:11:33
of wolves and grizzlies, and there was never more
2:11:35
wildlife than there's ever been. Because we've
2:11:37
changed everything and we have an expectation to have it
2:11:39
perfect, you're never going to have that.
2:11:40
When I when I encounter rapidly
2:11:43
anti wolf people. Yeah, right,
2:11:45
Yeah, and
2:11:47
then they'll tell me how they want to go hunt in Alaska.
2:11:50
Yeah, but you wouldn't like.
2:11:51
It, buddy, because.
2:11:54
Because it's ninety seven percent
2:11:56
of historic wolf habitat is occupied
2:11:58
by wolves, you wouldn't like it. There's no hunting
2:12:00
there wolves. What's
2:12:03
the hunt in Alaska?
2:12:03
Does that what you tell them?
2:12:05
Yeah?
2:12:05
Is that true?
2:12:06
No, of course it's not true. Okay, I'm
2:12:08
demonstrating absurdity by being absurd. Thank
2:12:10
you, Steve.
2:12:12
I'm shocked. Okay.
2:12:13
It's my favorite. I mean, I love it. It's my favorite place to
2:12:15
go. But I'm just saying I point out to
2:12:17
them, like, don't
2:12:19
lay it on me that they're incompatible, because tell that
2:12:22
to right, That's that everybody
2:12:24
dreams of going on hunting Alaska. It's like, well, let me tell
2:12:26
you something wolves
2:12:28
while something moves there. A couple of years ago, we'd watched how
2:12:31
many do we see one night? Fifteen
2:12:34
pretty much every evening fifteen to come through.
2:12:36
Wow.
2:12:37
Right, So I'm just saying it that
2:12:39
that perspective, and every
2:12:41
time, like every time we
2:12:43
talk about predators and every time we talk
2:12:45
about wolves, I always feel the need
2:12:47
to clarify like
2:12:50
my perspective on it, I think
2:12:52
it is. I think
2:12:54
it's immoral to
2:12:56
remove native
2:12:59
species from native habitat.
2:13:01
I just think it's like playing God in
2:13:03
a way that, however you want to
2:13:05
conceive of God, it's playing God in the way
2:13:07
that God would not agree with. Right,
2:13:09
It's like it's immoral, I think
2:13:12
to eliminate species from Earth.
2:13:17
I like seeing the tracks. I
2:13:19
like hearing them. I like seeing them.
2:13:23
I do not think they should be eradicated.
2:13:26
I like to try to achieve a
2:13:29
balance of
2:13:32
holding a bunch of different people's interests
2:13:34
in mind, because it's the only way we're going to survive
2:13:36
and live as humans. I think
2:13:38
that what as you said, I think that what's
2:13:42
been achieved here in
2:13:45
Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. It's
2:13:48
not perfect, but it's working,
2:13:51
and I think you would alleviate a
2:13:53
ton of the social stress
2:13:56
in the Upper Great Lakes if they were allowed
2:13:58
to pursue a similar path
2:14:01
with regulated hunting. I
2:14:05
don't know anybody when when wolves
2:14:08
walked into Colorado, of the people I hang out
2:14:10
with and associate with, and hunt with and talk with
2:14:12
all the time, when wolves showed
2:14:14
up in Colorado, I don't know anybody who
2:14:17
said to me they ought to get down there
2:14:19
with helicopters right now and find those wolves
2:14:21
and kill them. No one said that to me, right
2:14:26
h With the reintroduction, I've
2:14:28
had people basically say that if they could do
2:14:30
that, they would do that. It was like there's something about
2:14:33
it that just burns people. Of
2:14:35
course you don't want to there's something about it that they
2:14:37
don't want to them because it's
2:14:39
like it's like there's a way that we accept things
2:14:41
that we perceive to be natural,
2:14:44
and there's a way we accept people accept
2:14:46
things that perceive to be something getting shoved
2:14:48
down their throat, uh and
2:14:50
wolves walking into Colorado. People
2:14:53
kind of had a huh oh.
2:14:55
They they had like a doctorate degree
2:14:57
and pushing that ship down their throats down there.
2:14:59
I couldn't believe when I read that stat of like
2:15:02
Grant County is where they released the first
2:15:04
group, right, and I think that was one of the few
2:15:06
counties that overwhelmingly voted
2:15:09
against it. It was like a sixties
2:15:12
high sixties, maybe seventy percent against
2:15:14
it, and that was the county they chose
2:15:16
to here you go, But they
2:15:18
couldn't.
2:15:19
Reintroduce him into Boulder and Denver.
2:15:21
I mean that's where the boat was while
2:15:23
we're on Colorado again. I think it'd be
2:15:25
great. It'd be great to get
2:15:28
your thoughts, as you know, a
2:15:31
biologist with so much experience on
2:15:33
the ballot box biology that
2:15:35
they're proposing down there, and just
2:15:39
I guess in general, what your thoughts are on
2:15:41
ballot box biology and
2:15:44
if you think that's going to be a and
2:15:47
even you can leave the Mountain lion ban
2:15:49
alone, hunting band alone, but just
2:15:52
in general that if you think that that works
2:15:55
as a way to manage wildlife in our country,
2:15:57
well.
2:15:57
Obviously you feel strongly one way. That's a quite
2:16:00
loaded question, but I the
2:16:02
way you put it, I you'll
2:16:04
read in my book.
2:16:05
Well, the reason I'm interested
2:16:07
is because I feel like you do sit
2:16:09
in the middle and you connect with a lot of people
2:16:12
that I would like to connect to, and I feel
2:16:14
that we would probably land somewhere on the
2:16:17
on the same end of the spectrum and
2:16:20
want the same outcome. So I'd like to
2:16:22
hear how you talk to people
2:16:24
about this.
2:16:25
So I I've never been in favor
2:16:27
of wolf for introductions anywhere because they come
2:16:29
back on their own and there I feel
2:16:31
strongly we can never now test it because
2:16:33
it's too late. But I feel strongly that
2:16:36
there's a better social tolerance just what
2:16:38
you're saying if they come back on their own, like they
2:16:40
have done most places in the world and in the Midwest.
2:16:44
But now that they're here, you can't go backwards.
2:16:46
And wolves got to Oregon,
2:16:50
Washington, Utah, Colorado,
2:16:53
California, it's through dispersal, but they were dispersed
2:16:56
animals from a reintroduced population,
2:16:58
so they will never be thought is native
2:17:00
either, which I think that's
2:17:03
a shame. If we would have let
2:17:06
natural recovery happens just like three you did
2:17:08
in Montana, like it started doing Colorado,
2:17:10
like it's done in the Midwest, I
2:17:12
think we would be further ahead politically, but we'd
2:17:14
have less wolves by this point in time. But
2:17:17
how many years I mean, they were introduced those wolves
2:17:19
almost twenty thirty years ago. Now would
2:17:22
we be at the level we're at now? Probably
2:17:24
pretty close, because once wolves hit critical
2:17:27
mass, they take off without
2:17:29
the social baggage. That's how I feel.
2:17:31
You asked, That's how I feel, So
2:17:34
I don't know if I answered your question or not.
2:17:37
Well, I guess as
2:17:40
someone that's worked with wolves,
2:17:43
like did you like having
2:17:45
in your toolbox. I don't know. Did you ever
2:17:47
consider yourself a manager of wolves?
2:17:50
I'm not, was never up at the
2:17:52
top level I've managed.
2:17:54
I've done some going out and putting out propane
2:17:57
cannons and hanging flattery. Yeah, I've
2:17:59
done some of that.
2:18:00
But you advise people that sort of set management
2:18:03
strategy.
2:18:04
Yes, And I've come and
2:18:06
asked to be a anonymous commentator
2:18:08
on various federal plans.
2:18:09
Yes. So is it nice to have in your
2:18:11
toolbox hunting
2:18:15
as a way to manage these animals?
2:18:17
I think socially you have to have it. I'm not a
2:18:19
wolf hunter. I have no desire
2:18:21
to ever have to kill a wolf. I
2:18:24
don't It's just not who I am. Is
2:18:26
it a socially acceptable
2:18:28
tool? Does it creation social tolerance?
2:18:30
That's that's what people are
2:18:32
pushing and believing, And I think with reintroductions
2:18:36
that may be true. It's
2:18:39
a tough one. Like I said, I don't want to shoot
2:18:41
wolves, and I take lots of dead wolves on tailgates.
2:18:44
When I was working for fishwallfe parks, they come in. I
2:18:46
tagged lions and otters and martins and
2:18:48
wolves, and I always ask the people
2:18:50
the story how did you get
2:18:52
the wolf? Tell me the story of how you hunted
2:18:54
it. That made a difference to me when
2:18:57
I looked at it dead wolves, a dead wolf. But when
2:18:59
I heard some he said it was amazing.
2:19:01
I had an Elk tagnose out and I heard the wolves
2:19:03
howling, and this wolf walked
2:19:05
out, and I thought, my god, that's a magnificent
2:19:07
animal. I really want to I really
2:19:09
want to have it. I want to have a pelt or whatever.
2:19:12
I could understand that. And then people come
2:19:15
and say, these hate, these bastards, we should
2:19:17
shoot everyone them in the state. That really
2:19:19
was difficult. And when I think of that
2:19:21
kind of management that
2:19:24
I feel doesn't do justice
2:19:26
to us as hunters or biologists or
2:19:28
to the wildlife itself. And I really
2:19:30
think a big push we should have
2:19:33
is working with the public on
2:19:35
educating I hate that term, on
2:19:37
exchanging ideas with people what
2:19:39
wolves are and are not. I think there's
2:19:42
not enough information out there for
2:19:45
average person who wonders, well, how many yolk
2:19:47
does a wolf coiller? Or are the impacting
2:19:49
game? Put out all the information unbiased
2:19:52
in a format that people can use. I don't care if
2:19:54
it's a rock amount on Elk Foundation Google
2:19:56
or Outdoor Life or whatever. Montana
2:19:58
magazine put put it in a format
2:20:01
that's available for people
2:20:03
to read and understand. They better at ELK study.
2:20:05
They did.
2:20:06
They put quite a bit of information out, but
2:20:08
that's fade ay. The wolves are still killing
2:20:11
all the Elk. It's like, way, did you.
2:20:13
Read the article?
2:20:14
But people are biased because of their culture,
2:20:17
so I but I just think enough
2:20:19
information helps helps
2:20:22
calm down the flames on both ends. I
2:20:24
am a believer in that, and I hate the term
2:20:26
edgy. I hate it say we need to educate
2:20:28
so and so about that. It's like, oh God, can.
2:20:31
We know what that means? That means I need to tell that person
2:20:33
what I think.
2:20:34
That's right, that's right, but
2:20:37
to exchange information, that's what
2:20:39
well, the public needs to be educated.
2:20:41
No, I don't.
2:20:41
I hate that term, and I heard agencies
2:20:44
promote that all the time. But anyway, cuts
2:20:46
of your book, my
2:20:48
book, I want to hold it up, doctor
2:20:56
Diane boy I'm teasing about randall.
2:21:00
Have PhD written out there?
2:21:01
Of course not, but it's in the back under the bio
2:21:03
because I don't want I don't want people
2:21:05
to see doctor Dian Boyd and not buy it
2:21:08
because they their biases. They just see it's diyanboid.
2:21:10
There you go, that's a bias.
2:21:13
Definitely.
2:21:13
They'd be like, oh.
2:21:18
That one.
2:21:19
They'd be like some Berkeley egg ahead.
2:21:21
Telling me about please exactly,
2:21:25
Diane K.
2:21:25
Boyd not a doctor.
2:21:33
There you go, she's a doctor back here, Yeah,
2:21:36
Diane K. Boyd, a woman among wolves.
2:21:38
My journey through forty years of wolf covery. I
2:21:40
haven't read it. Uh, I
2:21:43
will read it.
2:21:44
I'll give you a personal copy.
2:21:46
I will read it, read it and
2:21:49
again.
2:21:50
Uh.
2:21:51
When we talked before and I loved it. It's
2:21:53
so good to hear your perspective
2:21:56
on these things. I
2:21:59
think a lot of what you're saying, I
2:22:01
think you're gonna what you're saying
2:22:03
is going to be is going to be very challenging.
2:22:07
Two people, no matter what how
2:22:09
they look at wolves. You you offer a very
2:22:11
challenging perspective because
2:22:13
it doesn't fall in line. It
2:22:17
doesn't fall in line with
2:22:20
the narratives that you
2:22:22
would get depending on your culture.
2:22:24
It's like you're you're offering a
2:22:27
really educated, nuanced
2:22:31
view of things that have come from being
2:22:33
in the room for a lot of discussions
2:22:35
over the year. I'm not like, I can't
2:22:38
say that you
2:22:40
know. I can't say that someone would be able
2:22:42
to go and determine that everything
2:22:45
you've said is exactly true
2:22:47
or right. But it's a challenging, like you're
2:22:49
offering a challenging, pretty
2:22:54
gracious, highly educated
2:22:56
perspective on how to think about predators, and
2:22:59
I appreciate you coming with us and doing
2:23:01
that.
2:23:01
Well.
2:23:01
Thanks.
2:23:02
Help people find your book and read it.
2:23:04
Thanks. When I wrote it, I was not allowed
2:23:06
to put in scientific references or footnotes.
2:23:09
I have my list at the end of suggested readings.
2:23:11
But I wrote it so that anybody can pick
2:23:13
it up, whether you like wolves or don't like wolves, or don't
2:23:15
care, regardless of your outdoor
2:23:17
experience. Anybody can pick that up and
2:23:20
get something from it. And
2:23:22
I don't preach. I tell through
2:23:24
stories and I wave science and
2:23:27
let the reader come to their own conclusions about
2:23:29
certain aspects of wolves being on the landscape.
2:23:32
So it's a different kind of a book.
2:23:34
And I lived it. I lived these wolves.
2:23:36
This is my story, and then it morphs
2:23:38
into present time in
2:23:41
twenty twenty three. And if you just like a good adventure
2:23:43
story, there's a lot of stories. I could read you a short thirty
2:23:45
second paragraph if you want. Hell.
2:23:47
Yeah, let's close with that.
2:23:48
Close it the opening introduction.
2:23:50
Yeah, we're going to close with this. So she's gonna get
2:23:53
done. You're gonna go buy the book. We're just going to end
2:23:55
the show. Phil's gonna turn the machine off when it's done.
2:23:57
But this will give you a taste of how it's written, and
2:23:59
I'm looking forward to it.
2:24:00
This is probably thirty five years ago. My
2:24:02
pickup banged and rattled along the potholed
2:24:05
inside road in the northwest corner of Glacier
2:24:07
National Park. Boxes of wolf
2:24:09
trap and jars of bait slid across the truck
2:24:11
bed. I was in a hurry, my mind focused
2:24:13
on the wolf cotton a trap somewhere ahead in the Lodgepole
2:24:16
Pine Forest. Out of the corner
2:24:18
of my eye, I noticed motion in
2:24:20
my rear view mirror. I looked up to
2:24:23
catch the glassy reflection of vivid
2:24:25
yellow eyes framed by a wolf's black
2:24:27
face looking over my shoulder from the
2:24:29
back seat. How did I get here? Opening
2:24:33
paragraph,
2:24:36
Diane, You you got to come back. Appreciate
2:24:39
it, thank you, thank you.
2:24:42
Honest.
2:24:42
You got to keep your shoes on during this podcast,
2:24:49
I'm still recorded.
2:24:57
The koyas
2:25:02
away wone
2:25:05
shooting start with shut
2:25:07
swell being
2:25:12
sign of breakfast, and
2:25:14
we laid down the
2:25:17
bed it's
2:25:19
been on day and nin.
2:25:21
Windyll them
2:25:26
cotting with trees lost
2:25:29
step lesly every breeze.
2:25:34
Master footsteps that I
2:25:36
took.
2:25:40
You on.
2:25:40
The noise was wide like
2:25:43
a live Brian.
2:25:47
Learn more from namn trees before.
2:25:50
Everybod than
2:25:54
ever made shiver
2:25:58
shoot swept.
2:26:01
Waves up in.
2:26:04
My reading up here.
2:26:08
Sometimes you're burning up.
2:26:11
Sometimes you're going with
2:26:14
because you mean you're the fever.
2:26:18
Ragon, don't
2:26:22
you Mainer.
2:26:23
The fur Bagon.
2:26:43
Go on through the plain still
2:26:46
called Basbley in greens.
2:26:51
Gets there all out in them
2:26:53
wield.
2:26:56
You smileings the you
2:26:59
rye all and your minds
2:27:02
be surprised.
2:27:05
That old river.
2:27:07
Minyl
2:27:11
fever makes you shiver,
2:27:14
That fever makes you sweet,
2:27:18
wakes.
2:27:19
You up in babing
2:27:22
permade of you. Sometimes
2:27:27
you're burning up. Sometimes
2:27:29
they're gold man with because
2:27:32
you Mainer fever w
2:27:38
only you anger the
2:27:41
fer bging
2:28:13
that fear macey shiver,
2:28:17
that fere amazing sweat
2:28:21
wis you have and min
2:28:24
be pernain unjust. Sometimes
2:28:29
you're burning up. Sometimes
2:28:31
you're colding w because.
2:28:35
You made yourr feeder cry.
2:28:45
You may you
2:28:49
may CA, You
2:28:56
ain't time.
2:28:59
You wait.
2:29:00
Turded favor, domag
2:29:03
wait fav
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More